The teenager was approached by a police officer and told he was not allowed to use the word "cult" to describe Scientology
|
Tagged with : $cientology, $cifag, bn is not /b/, bn is not anonymous, bn is not co$, britain is ruled by pussies, co$, cult, flashfail, flashlv meltdown, meat, scientology is a chav, scientology is a cult, scientology is a cunt What are tags? |
flashlv: the willful giving of false testimony under oath
Right there.
The keyword is WILLFUL,which shows intent to deceive.
You're welcome.
Right, willful, as in, on purpose. Why would one lie or perjure themselves NOT on purpose.
I'm taking the nearest left off your circular logic.
Right there.
The keyword is WILLFUL,which shows intent to deceive.
You're welcome.
Right, willful, as in, on purpose. Why would one lie or perjure themselves NOT on purpose.
I'm taking the nearest left off your circular logic.
flashlv: Youtube and and I believe PETA wants to help the polar bears from losing habitat from 'GLOBAL WARMING'
That's because of the polar bears. Not because of global warming. They are the:
People for the
Ethical
Treatment of
Animals
Their agenda does not include concerning themselves with pollution specifically. Only if it hurts the widdle animals.
That's because of the polar bears. Not because of global warming. They are the:
People for the
Ethical
Treatment of
Animals
Their agenda does not include concerning themselves with pollution specifically. Only if it hurts the widdle animals.
And to who ever upvotes farvas replies to me: Fuck you too.
notsuebhoney: Right, willful, as in, on purpose. Why would one lie or perjure themselves NOT on purpose.
I'm taking the nearest left off your circular logic.
Explain? All I said was that for someone to commit perjury there needs to be intent.
I'm taking the nearest left off your circular logic.
Explain? All I said was that for someone to commit perjury there needs to be intent.
notsuebhoney: So you are downvoting him?
Yeah. I told him not to harass me. He continues. That gets a downvote. End of story.
Yeah. I told him not to harass me. He continues. That gets a downvote. End of story.
flashlv: Explain? All I said was that for someone to commit perjury there needs to be intent.
Lying is the intent. How you fail to see this is beyond me.
Why would anyone NOT lie on purpose? Wouldn't that be telling the truth.
You have the mastery of the english language equivalent to VS.
Lying is the intent. How you fail to see this is beyond me.
Why would anyone NOT lie on purpose? Wouldn't that be telling the truth.
You have the mastery of the english language equivalent to VS.
notsuebhoney: proof?
He said he downvoted me last week, I don't remember the thread, but UT was there. He said he would downvote my posts and when he said that all my posts directed to him were downvoted.
2 hours later he had no nancy score. That's my proof.
He said he downvoted me last week, I don't remember the thread, but UT was there. He said he would downvote my posts and when he said that all my posts directed to him were downvoted.
2 hours later he had no nancy score. That's my proof.
hell toupee: Yeah. I told him not to harass me. He continues. That gets a downvote. End of story.
Nancy.
Nancy.
untrustworthy: That's because of the polar bears. Not because of global warming. They are the:
People for the
Ethical
Treatment of
Animals
Their agenda does not include concerning themselves with pollution specifically. Only if it hurts the widdle animals.
Not specifically, but they still do. They get involved with any animal issues.
People for the
Ethical
Treatment of
Animals
Their agenda does not include concerning themselves with pollution specifically. Only if it hurts the widdle animals.
Not specifically, but they still do. They get involved with any animal issues.
hell toupee: Yeah. I told him not to harass me. He continues. That gets a downvote. End of story.
And watch his nancy score, it will not move.
And watch his nancy score, it will not move.
flashlv: Not specifically, but they still do. They get involved with any animal issues.
Animal issue. Not environmental.
Animal issue. Not environmental.
flashlv
Just out of curiosity, if you are so strongly against Anonymous, why aren't you helping Co$ with their efforts? It's obvious you believe $cientology has a right to exist. Why not put forth as much effort as you do here for them?
Just out of curiosity, if you are so strongly against Anonymous, why aren't you helping Co$ with their efforts? It's obvious you believe $cientology has a right to exist. Why not put forth as much effort as you do here for them?
notsuebhoney: Lying is the intent. How you fail to see this is beyond me.
Why would anyone NOT lie on purpose? Wouldn't that be telling the truth.
You have the mastery of the english language equivalent to VS.
Wait, I don't think you understand what we were discussing. My argument the whole time was that Quick1 thinks that anything incorrect by a police officer is a lie even if it was not a lie.
That's where we went to perjury. My argument is that a lie has to be intentional, meaning you cannot lie if you recall something incorrectly, like on a police report.
We also went on to discuss perjury. To commit perjury it cannot be because your were incorrect on accident. You would have to show intent, meaning you would have to lie. And a lie can only be intentional, either by misstating something on purpose or bending the truth on purpose.
So no need to attack me because you missed the whole argument from before.
Why would anyone NOT lie on purpose? Wouldn't that be telling the truth.
You have the mastery of the english language equivalent to VS.
Wait, I don't think you understand what we were discussing. My argument the whole time was that Quick1 thinks that anything incorrect by a police officer is a lie even if it was not a lie.
That's where we went to perjury. My argument is that a lie has to be intentional, meaning you cannot lie if you recall something incorrectly, like on a police report.
We also went on to discuss perjury. To commit perjury it cannot be because your were incorrect on accident. You would have to show intent, meaning you would have to lie. And a lie can only be intentional, either by misstating something on purpose or bending the truth on purpose.
So no need to attack me because you missed the whole argument from before.
flashlv: Wait, I don't think you understand what we were discussing. My argument the whole time was that Quick1 thinks that anything incorrect by a police officer is a lie even if it was not a lie.
That's where we went to perjury. My argument is that a lie has to be intentional, meaning you cannot lie if you recall something incorrectly, like on a police report.
We also went on to discuss perjury. To commit perjury it cannot be because your were incorrect on accident. You would have to show intent, meaning you would have to lie. And a lie can only be intentional, either by misstating something on purpose or bending the truth on purpose.
So no need to attack me because you missed the whole argument from before.
You don't seem to understand that the word lying and perjury already have intent built into them. But you keep telling yourself you know better.
Where is that circular logic pic when I need it?
That's where we went to perjury. My argument is that a lie has to be intentional, meaning you cannot lie if you recall something incorrectly, like on a police report.
We also went on to discuss perjury. To commit perjury it cannot be because your were incorrect on accident. You would have to show intent, meaning you would have to lie. And a lie can only be intentional, either by misstating something on purpose or bending the truth on purpose.
So no need to attack me because you missed the whole argument from before.
You don't seem to understand that the word lying and perjury already have intent built into them. But you keep telling yourself you know better.
Where is that circular logic pic when I need it?
notsuebhoney: flashlv
Just out of curiosity, if you are so strongly against Anonymous, why aren't you helping Co$ with their efforts? It's obvious you believe $cientology has a right to exist. Why not put forth as much effort as you do here for them?
Because I don't care about COS. I believe any religion has the right to exist and I think the constitution says so also.
Just out of curiosity, if you are so strongly against Anonymous, why aren't you helping Co$ with their efforts? It's obvious you believe $cientology has a right to exist. Why not put forth as much effort as you do here for them?
Because I don't care about COS. I believe any religion has the right to exist and I think the constitution says so also.
notsuebhoney: You don't seem to understand that the word lying and perjury already have intent built into them. But you keep telling yourself you know better.
Where is that circular logic pic when I need it?
I haven't said differently though, that's what is confusing me. We believe the same exact thing, Quick1 is the one that think perjury is just misstating something on accident.
Where is that circular logic pic when I need it?
I haven't said differently though, that's what is confusing me. We believe the same exact thing, Quick1 is the one that think perjury is just misstating something on accident.
notsuebhoney: I can't be bothered today. My heart just isn't in it.
You win on faulty logic, okay?
No faulty logic, you just jumped in to a conversation we had in another thread.
You win on faulty logic, okay?
No faulty logic, you just jumped in to a conversation we had in another thread.
flashlv: No faulty logic, you just jumped in to a conversation we had in another thread.
Nope, I read the thread.
But hey you're winning using faulty logic, so what do you care, right?
Nope, I read the thread.
But hey you're winning using faulty logic, so what do you care, right?
notsuebhoney: Nope, I read the thread.
But hey you're winning using faulty logic, so what do you care, right?
What faulty logic has there been Sue? I said a lie is a lie and perjury is perjury. I have stated nothing else.
So please explain.
But hey you're winning using faulty logic, so what do you care, right?
What faulty logic has there been Sue? I said a lie is a lie and perjury is perjury. I have stated nothing else.
So please explain.
flashlv: Because I don't care about COS. I believe any religion has the right to exist and I think the constitution says so also.
You do realize the same amendment that allows the religion to exist also protects peoples' right to criticize said religion, right?
You do realize the same amendment that allows the religion to exist also protects peoples' right to criticize said religion, right?
flashlv: What faulty logic has there been Sue? I said a lie is a lie and perjury is perjury. I have stated nothing else.
So please explain.
You're not worth the explanation. You don't understand basic english.
So please explain.
You're not worth the explanation. You don't understand basic english.
untrustworthy: You do realize the same amendment that allows the religion to exist also protects peoples' right to criticize said religion, right?
I don't care about criticizing, that's is what you guys miss. I care about harassment, like following people with a sign, saying, this guy has a gun. Harassment like calling COS and making harassing phone calls.
If they want to protest and actually care, then I would respect them more. At this point I believe they think it's a big party or joke. I don't think they really care about what they are protesting against.
I don't care about criticizing, that's is what you guys miss. I care about harassment, like following people with a sign, saying, this guy has a gun. Harassment like calling COS and making harassing phone calls.
If they want to protest and actually care, then I would respect them more. At this point I believe they think it's a big party or joke. I don't think they really care about what they are protesting against.
notsuebhoney: You're not worth the explanation. You don't understand basic english.
I understand it pretty well, you seem to be mad because you can't explain where I was wrong and it's frustrating you.
I understand it pretty well, you seem to be mad because you can't explain where I was wrong and it's frustrating you.
I'm not mad. I said my heart wasn't in it and you have the mastery of the language like VS.
Figure it out.
I even said you won. Why are you whining? :)
Figure it out.
I even said you won. Why are you whining? :)
flashlv: I don't care about criticizing, that's is what you guys miss. I care about harassment, like following people with a sign, saying, this guy has a gun. Harassment like calling COS and making harassing phone calls.
If they want to protest and actually care, then I would respect them more. At this point I believe they think it's a big party or joke. I don't think they really care about what they are protesting against.
If they break the law, then hold the individuals accountable. But the vast majority of their activities are simply an expression of free speech.
So while they're in their right to criticize COS, you are free to criticize their actions, and others here are free to criticize you for what you say.
Freedom is fun!
If they want to protest and actually care, then I would respect them more. At this point I believe they think it's a big party or joke. I don't think they really care about what they are protesting against.
If they break the law, then hold the individuals accountable. But the vast majority of their activities are simply an expression of free speech.
So while they're in their right to criticize COS, you are free to criticize their actions, and others here are free to criticize you for what you say.
Freedom is fun!
Leave me out of it, woman.
notsuebhoney: I'm not mad. I said my heart wasn't in it and you have the mastery of the language like VS.
Figure it out.
I even said you won. Why are you whining? :)
Are you talking to yourself again? =D
Figure it out.
I even said you won. Why are you whining? :)
Are you talking to yourself again? =D
untrustworthy: If they break the law, then hold the individuals accountable. But the vast majority of their activities are simply an expression of free speech.
So while they're in their right to criticize COS, you are free to criticize their actions, and others here are free to criticize you for what you say.
Freedom is fun!
Agree, I'm just speaking out against them, but for some reason people think I shouldn't.
So while they're in their right to criticize COS, you are free to criticize their actions, and others here are free to criticize you for what you say.
Freedom is fun!
Agree, I'm just speaking out against them, but for some reason people think I shouldn't.
Did valentin down a container of Ajax when he was disemvowled? He doesn't sound the same anymore.
flashlv: Agree, I'm just speaking out against them, but for some reason people think I shouldn't.
No, they're criticizing you for your stance. Just as you criticize Anonymous for theirs.
No, they're criticizing you for your stance. Just as you criticize Anonymous for theirs.
No i havn't downed anything, i'm just a little bit sad that an add on was built specificaly to remove all my posts from this site.
valentinselezynov: No i havn't downed anything, i'm just a little bit sad that an add on was built specificaly to remove all my posts from this site.
[image hidden]
[image hidden]
valentinselezynov: No i havn't downed anything, i'm just a little bit sad that an add on was built specificaly to remove all my posts from this site.
Are you talking about the ignore feature? It's been there for a long time.
Are you talking about the ignore feature? It's been there for a long time.
flashlv: I look at it differently. If they cared, they wouldn't be sitting around singing Will Smith songs and wearing masks.
If they wanted to be taken seriously they also wouldn't break the law by committing crimes like denial of service attacks.
What is your proof that anonymous is behind the DoS attacks? Also, the masks are because they are fearful of retribution on the part of Co$.
If they wanted to be taken seriously they also wouldn't break the law by committing crimes like denial of service attacks.
What is your proof that anonymous is behind the DoS attacks? Also, the masks are because they are fearful of retribution on the part of Co$.
Honestly, i feel i'm not being dramatic enough. I mean, this site is so biased against me, it is rebuilding itself to exclude my posts automaticaly. How am i supposed to feel? Happy?
untrustworthy: Are you talking about the ignore feature? It's been there for a long time.
No, there is a new FF ext. that will strip his posts from threads.
No, there is a new FF ext. that will strip his posts from threads.
valentinselezynov: Honestly, i feel i'm not being dramatic enough. I mean, this site is so biased against me, it is rebuilding itself to exclude my posts automaticaly. How am i supposed to feel? Happy?
You just need more exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!11!!11
You just need more exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!11!!11
valentinselezynov: Honestly, i feel i'm not being dramatic enough. I mean, this site is so biased against me, it is rebuilding itself to exclude my posts automaticaly. How am i supposed to feel? Happy?
[image hidden]
[image hidden]
valentinselezynov: Honestly, i feel i'm not being dramatic enough. I mean, this site is so biased against me, it is rebuilding itself to exclude my posts automaticaly. How am i supposed to feel? Happy?
I agree.
I agree.
quick1: What is your proof that anonymous is behind the DoS attacks? Also, the masks are because they are fearful of retribution on the part of Co$.
COS has magic facial recognition software. There is no fear of that, it's unfounded fear.
They admitted it I believe. (the DoS attacks)
COS has magic facial recognition software. There is no fear of that, it's unfounded fear.
They admitted it I believe. (the DoS attacks)
flashlv: COS has magic facial recognition software. There is no fear of that, it's unfounded fear.
They admitted it I believe. (the DoS attacks)
You believe? How about the actual admission.
Facial recognition software isn't exactly magical anymore. It's in airports.
They admitted it I believe. (the DoS attacks)
You believe? How about the actual admission.
Facial recognition software isn't exactly magical anymore. It's in airports.
valentinselezynov: No i havn't downed anything, i'm just a little bit sad that an add on was built specificaly to remove all my posts from this site.
Try being less of a tool then.
Try being less of a tool then.
I'm also sad that i jus completely f*cked up my website whilest trying to change the layout. Html is apparantly another language i'm yet to master.
valentinselezynov:
for those of you who have vs blocked and want to know what he's saying, but not enough to turn the block off. here it is.
for those of you who have vs blocked and want to know what he's saying, but not enough to turn the block off. here it is.
meta: Try being less of a tool then.
I'm a tool for good. That's like asking a guitarist to cut off his arms.
I'm a tool for good. That's like asking a guitarist to cut off his arms.
notsuebhoney: No, there is a new FF ext. that will strip his posts from threads.
Weird. I didn't see that. Is it only to strip his comments?
Weird. I didn't see that. Is it only to strip his comments?
Bye then.
LEAVE FLASH ALONE!
HES STILL BUTTHURT OVER THE HAL TURNER RAIDS.
FLASH = HAL TURNER.
STFU PROTESTFAGS.
EVER NOTICE HOW NONE OF THESE "ANON" SUPPORTERS KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HAL TURNER, BITING BEAVER, WUORIAIDS, FORT LONGCAT OR HABBO?
I MUST ADMIT THE PROTESTFAGS ARE AMUSING AND PROVIDE BETTER COVER THAN EBAUMS.
THE EPILEPSY RAIDS WERE EPIC.
NOW LET THE BAWWWWWWWWING BEGIN.
SAGE IN EVERY FIELD.
HES STILL BUTTHURT OVER THE HAL TURNER RAIDS.
FLASH = HAL TURNER.
STFU PROTESTFAGS.
EVER NOTICE HOW NONE OF THESE "ANON" SUPPORTERS KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HAL TURNER, BITING BEAVER, WUORIAIDS, FORT LONGCAT OR HABBO?
I MUST ADMIT THE PROTESTFAGS ARE AMUSING AND PROVIDE BETTER COVER THAN EBAUMS.
THE EPILEPSY RAIDS WERE EPIC.
NOW LET THE BAWWWWWWWWING BEGIN.
SAGE IN EVERY FIELD.
valentinselezynov: I'm also sad that i jus completely f*cked up my website whilest trying to change the layout. Html is apparantly another language i'm yet to master.
What software are you using to lay it out?
What software are you using to lay it out?
untrustworthy: Weird. I didn't see that. Is it only to strip his comments?
I believe so. There's a link for it in the Beer Garden. Search out ludditemike's posts.
I believe so. There's a link for it in the Beer Garden. Search out ludditemike's posts.
valentinselezynov: Bye then.
Bye, John. Don't get hit by a bullet on the way out. It would be awful for you to die 2x that way :(
Bye, John. Don't get hit by a bullet on the way out. It would be awful for you to die 2x that way :(
notsuebhoney: I believe so. There's a link for it in the Beer Garden. Search out ludditemike's posts.
If that's the case, then it's fucking stupid. There's no reason to single people out, IMO.
If that's the case, then it's fucking stupid. There's no reason to single people out, IMO.
untrustworthy: If that's the case, then it's fucking stupid. There's no reason to single people out, IMO.
Maybe it's easier for some than using ignore *shrug*
I'm not using it, I love it when VS posts.
Maybe it's easier for some than using ignore *shrug*
I'm not using it, I love it when VS posts.
flashlv: I understand it pretty well, you seem to be mad because you can't explain where I was wrong and it's frustrating you.
Trying to explain something to the retarded takes dedication. That's why there is such a high turnover rate for special education instructors. When you have a retard, such as yourself, hitting himself in the balls with a hammer and then crying about it, you tend to get tired of telling the retard his balls hurt because of the hammering, and sometimes you might even want to join in.
Trying to explain something to the retarded takes dedication. That's why there is such a high turnover rate for special education instructors. When you have a retard, such as yourself, hitting himself in the balls with a hammer and then crying about it, you tend to get tired of telling the retard his balls hurt because of the hammering, and sometimes you might even want to join in.
quick1: You believe? How about the actual admission.
Facial recognition software isn't exactly magical anymore. It's in airports.
I believe means I remember reading it or watching a video of it. Hurrr
Facial recognition software isn't exactly magical anymore. It's in airports.
I believe means I remember reading it or watching a video of it. Hurrr
quick1: You believe? How about the actual admission.
Facial recognition software isn't exactly magical anymore. It's in airports.
oh and it's magical because facial recognition doesn't pull your address and name out of the air.
Facial recognition software isn't exactly magical anymore. It's in airports.
oh and it's magical because facial recognition doesn't pull your address and name out of the air.
valentinselezynov: I'm also sad that i jus completely f*cked up my website whilest trying to change the layout. Html is apparantly another language i'm yet to master.
I agree.
valentinselezynov: I'm a tool for good. That's like asking a guitarist to cut off his arms.
I agree.
valentinselezynov: Bye then.
I agree.
I agree.
valentinselezynov: I'm a tool for good. That's like asking a guitarist to cut off his arms.
I agree.
valentinselezynov: Bye then.
I agree.
flashlv: oh and it's magical because facial recognition doesn't pull your address and name out of the air.
You're right, it pulls it from something else magical. Sysadmin Soothsayers call it a "database".
You're right, it pulls it from something else magical. Sysadmin Soothsayers call it a "database".
quick1: You're right, it pulls it from something else magical. Sysadmin Soothsayers call it a "database".
And where did they get pictures with all their information to put in that database?
And where did they get pictures with all their information to put in that database?
flashlv: And where did they get pictures with all their information to put in that database?
Another magical place called the "INTERNET". Or other magical places of public record.
Another magical place called the "INTERNET". Or other magical places of public record.
battlemallion: Trying to explain something to the retarded takes dedication. That's why there is such a high turnover rate for special education instructors. When you have a retard, such as yourself, hitting himself in the balls with a hammer and then crying about it, you tend to get tired of telling the retard his balls hurt because of the hammering, and sometimes you might even want to join in.
Tagged: ball peen hammer
Tagged: ball peen hammer
quick1: Another magical place called the "INTERNET". Or other magical places of public record.
And how do they make that connection Quick? Please explain how they can take a photo and personal information and make their software matchup all the information?
Please explain because it's impossible to take someones face and match it with records without another face to match it with.
And how do they make that connection Quick? Please explain how they can take a photo and personal information and make their software matchup all the information?
Please explain because it's impossible to take someones face and match it with records without another face to match it with.
flashlv: And how do they make that connection Quick? Please explain how they can take a photo and personal information and make their software matchup all the information?
Please explain because it's impossible to take someones face and match it with records without another face to match it with.
It's impossible to match someone's face to a name using the internet? Is that really what you want to claim?
Please explain because it's impossible to take someones face and match it with records without another face to match it with.
It's impossible to match someone's face to a name using the internet? Is that really what you want to claim?
hell toupee: Oh, and I told him to stop replying to me and I consider any such reply harassment.
And I have no alts.
The same time he admitted to downvoting my posts I downvoted an upvoted post that attacked me. I already have a nancy for that downvote, but Hell Toupee again doesn't have one.
So Hell Toupee you are a fucking liar!
And I have no alts.
The same time he admitted to downvoting my posts I downvoted an upvoted post that attacked me. I already have a nancy for that downvote, but Hell Toupee again doesn't have one.
So Hell Toupee you are a fucking liar!
quick1: It's impossible to match someone's face to a name using the internet? Is that really what you want to claim?
I am claiming that with the technology they have it is impossible and not feasible for them to do it.
They would have to have access to a photo on the internet that already has your personal information on it. Then they would need your picture to be clear enough to make the connection.
Yes it is impossible for them to do it the way you think they can do it.
Can you explain how they can match a picture they took of me with a database without a picture of me?
There is no internet database with my picture and personal information.
I am claiming that with the technology they have it is impossible and not feasible for them to do it.
They would have to have access to a photo on the internet that already has your personal information on it. Then they would need your picture to be clear enough to make the connection.
Yes it is impossible for them to do it the way you think they can do it.
Can you explain how they can match a picture they took of me with a database without a picture of me?
There is no internet database with my picture and personal information.
flashlv: I am claiming that with the technology they have it is impossible and not feasible for them to do it.
They would have to have access to a photo on the internet that already has your personal information on it. Then they would need your picture to be clear enough to make the connection..
So there are no websites where a person could put a picture of their face that is associated with their real name? Perhaps a website where they could put those Face pictures in a Book of some sort.
They would have to have access to a photo on the internet that already has your personal information on it. Then they would need your picture to be clear enough to make the connection..
So there are no websites where a person could put a picture of their face that is associated with their real name? Perhaps a website where they could put those Face pictures in a Book of some sort.
quick1: So there are no websites where a person could put a picture of their face that is associated with their real name? Perhaps a website where they could put those Face pictures in a Book of some sort.
First of all, that would be people manually clicking the facebook profiles and accessing those photos. Also there will be no address for that person. Again what you think is possible is not possible the way you think it works.
You think they take a photo, put it in a database, that program they have scours the internet, and makes the facial connection, then magically adds their address to the database.
Sorry, not possible with what they have.
First of all, that would be people manually clicking the facebook profiles and accessing those photos. Also there will be no address for that person. Again what you think is possible is not possible the way you think it works.
You think they take a photo, put it in a database, that program they have scours the internet, and makes the facial connection, then magically adds their address to the database.
Sorry, not possible with what they have.
flashlv: First of all, that would be people manually clicking the facebook profiles and accessing those photos. Also there will be no address for that person. Again what you think is possible is not possible the way you think it works.
I didn't say anything about an address. I'm simply matching up names with pictures of their faces at this point, once you have a name it's fairly easy to get an address. It would take less than a week to write up a spider that crawled through facebook, downloaded pictures and their names, and then stuck them into a database.
You're the one saying it's absolutely not possible for facial recognition software to exist, and that even if it did, it would be impossible to match it up with a name. I'm simply giving you a relatively easy example of how it is certainly possible. Does the Church of Scientology have that combination of software? Who knows, but they certainly have the monetary backing to acquire it.
The fact is, that Anonymous uses masks because they do not want to bring retribution upon themselves. Whether that fear is justified or not really doesn't matter.
I didn't say anything about an address. I'm simply matching up names with pictures of their faces at this point, once you have a name it's fairly easy to get an address. It would take less than a week to write up a spider that crawled through facebook, downloaded pictures and their names, and then stuck them into a database.
You're the one saying it's absolutely not possible for facial recognition software to exist, and that even if it did, it would be impossible to match it up with a name. I'm simply giving you a relatively easy example of how it is certainly possible. Does the Church of Scientology have that combination of software? Who knows, but they certainly have the monetary backing to acquire it.
The fact is, that Anonymous uses masks because they do not want to bring retribution upon themselves. Whether that fear is justified or not really doesn't matter.
valentinselezynov: Honestly, i feel i'm not being dramatic enough. I mean, this site is so biased against me, it is rebuilding itself to exclude my posts automaticaly. How am i supposed to feel? Happy?
[image hidden]
You look pretty happy to me.
[image hidden]
You look pretty happy to me.
quick1:
The fact is, that Anonymous uses masks because they do not want to bring retribution upon themselves. Whether that fear is justified or not really doesn't matter.
The fear is unjustified and BULLSHIT
The fact is, that Anonymous uses masks because they do not want to bring retribution upon themselves. Whether that fear is justified or not really doesn't matter.
The fear is unjustified and BULLSHIT
flashlv: I dislike people who protest just to protest and really don't care for the cause they are protesting for.
I have the right to dislike people, I choose to dislike groups of people who have a tendency to riot and harass.
I know a bunch of people involved. They care. Many have lost family and friends to the cult.
Also, some joined for the fun, but once they learned the truth they really started to care.
I assume you still haven't actually read any of the stories or talked to anyone involed.
I have the right to dislike people, I choose to dislike groups of people who have a tendency to riot and harass.
I know a bunch of people involved. They care. Many have lost family and friends to the cult.
Also, some joined for the fun, but once they learned the truth they really started to care.
I assume you still haven't actually read any of the stories or talked to anyone involed.
abbynormal: I know a bunch of people involved. They care. Many have lost family and friends to the cult.
Also, some joined for the fun, but once they learned the truth they really started to care.
I assume you still haven't actually read any of the stories or talked to anyone involed.
I have, and I don't believe them.
Also, some joined for the fun, but once they learned the truth they really started to care.
I assume you still haven't actually read any of the stories or talked to anyone involed.
I have, and I don't believe them.
flashlv: The fear is unjustified and BULLSHIT
You are free to think that way, and at your next protest, feel free to not wear a mask. Many of the members of Anonymous who protest do not believe the fear is unjustified, which is why they wear the masks.
You are free to think that way, and at your next protest, feel free to not wear a mask. Many of the members of Anonymous who protest do not believe the fear is unjustified, which is why they wear the masks.
flashlv: I have, and I don't believe them.
Why would so many people make something like this up?
I supposed you think the people who claim to have been molested by priests are lying little attention whores too.
Why would so many people make something like this up?
I supposed you think the people who claim to have been molested by priests are lying little attention whores too.
quick1: You are free to think that way, and at your next protest, feel free to not wear a mask. Many of the members of Anonymous who protest do not believe the fear is unjustified, which is why they wear the masks.
They do, they do it for drama reasons.
They do, they do it for drama reasons.
abbynormal: Why would so many people make something like this up?
I supposed you think the people who claim to have been molested by priests are lying little attention whores too.
Naw, many probably were molested.
As far as the scientology ones, I think most is fabricated.
I supposed you think the people who claim to have been molested by priests are lying little attention whores too.
Naw, many probably were molested.
As far as the scientology ones, I think most is fabricated.
flashlv: Naw, many probably were molested.
As far as the scientology ones, I think most is fabricated.
Why?
As far as the scientology ones, I think most is fabricated.
Why?
flashlv: Because they seem to have an agenda.
If stopping abuse is an agenda, then yes, they do.
No one who has escaped the church and told their stories is profiting from it. They just don't want the same thing to happen to others.
If stopping abuse is an agenda, then yes, they do.
No one who has escaped the church and told their stories is profiting from it. They just don't want the same thing to happen to others.
abbynormal: If stopping abuse is an agenda, then yes, they do.
No one who has escaped the church and told their stories is profiting from it. They just don't want the same thing to happen to others.
Also no way to prove the people saying they had issues actually had issues or were ever in the church to begin with.
No one who has escaped the church and told their stories is profiting from it. They just don't want the same thing to happen to others.
Also no way to prove the people saying they had issues actually had issues or were ever in the church to begin with.
flashlv: Also no way to prove the people saying they had issues actually had issues or were ever in the church to begin with.
I think you are full of shit and arguing for the sake of arguing.
I'd forgotten how pointless talking to you about this was.
I'm going outside.
I think you are full of shit and arguing for the sake of arguing.
I'd forgotten how pointless talking to you about this was.
I'm going outside.
flashlv: The fear is unjustified and BULLSHIT
http://theframeproblem.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/cult-of-scientology-exposes-identity-of-anonymous-protester/
They put a bunch of effort into outing these protesters.
They have been known to infiltrate government to retrieve information
OMG the masks are unjustified bullshit!
Lets start talking about facts instead of getting high and making assumptions shall we?
http://theframeproblem.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/cult-of-scientology-exposes-identity-of-anonymous-protester/
They put a bunch of effort into outing these protesters.
They have been known to infiltrate government to retrieve information
OMG the masks are unjustified bullshit!
Lets start talking about facts instead of getting high and making assumptions shall we?
abbynormal: I think you are full of shit and arguing for the sake of arguing.
I'd forgotten how pointless talking to you about this was.
I'm going outside.
Typical for BN, if someone doesn't see your side, they are full of shit. Glad to know you guys never change.
I'd forgotten how pointless talking to you about this was.
I'm going outside.
Typical for BN, if someone doesn't see your side, they are full of shit. Glad to know you guys never change.
eosdominus: http://theframeproblem.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/cult-of-scientology-exposes-identity-of-anonymous-protester/
They put a bunch of effort into outing these protesters.
They have been known to infiltrate government to retrieve information
OMG the masks are unjustified bullshit!
Lets start talking about facts instead of getting high and making assumptions shall we?
Again, I don't believe it.
They put a bunch of effort into outing these protesters.
They have been known to infiltrate government to retrieve information
OMG the masks are unjustified bullshit!
Lets start talking about facts instead of getting high and making assumptions shall we?
Again, I don't believe it.
Please sign in to post.
Even if you create an account you can still post anonymously!
Even if you create an account you can still post anonymously!