Presumably politically-ignorant seven-year old students asked to draw a picture of the President of the United States in celebration of inauguration day. Butthurt ensues



Tagged with : dick organsack , if my name was dick organsack

What are tags?
sunofsam 241 2009-02-04 14:31:07.0 login to vote score 0
BAWWW
keerbip 4358 2009-02-04 14:33:40.0 login to vote score 8
We colored pictures of Reagan when I was a kid.

New Rochelle Superintendent of Schools Richard Organisciak, an Obama supporter, did not respond to emails requesting comment.

I wouldn't respond either if my name was Dick Organsack.


fatsean 3838 2009-02-04 14:35:57.0 login to vote score 0
Bahahahahahaha...Hope Richard Cox gets laid off. What a turd.
fatsean 3838 2009-02-04 14:36:25.0 login to vote score 0
keerbip: We colored pictures of Reagan when I was a kid.

New Rochelle Superintendent of Schools Richard Organisciak, an Obama supporter, did not respond to emails requesting comment.

I wouldn't respond either if my name was Dick Organsack.


But what if Dick Cocks was calling?
feepness 1629 2009-02-04 14:36:58.0 login to vote score 0
They just need to have a 'Choose Life' coloring day to balance it out.
smoke 420 2009-02-04 14:37:14.0 login to vote score 0
keerbip: ...I wouldn't respond either if my name was Dick Organsack.


I thought it was Dick Oregano-Kiosk.
totalsecurity 1281 2009-02-04 14:37:51.0 login to vote score 7
"I was mad", the second grader told Talk of the Sound. "I wanted McCain to win".

You'd have to be mad to want Angry McInsane/Sarah Failin to win.
jingks 2056 2009-02-04 14:38:43.0 login to vote score 0
keerbip: I wouldn't respond either if my name was Dick Organsack.

i was thinking Dick Organ is Cawk.
mutilato 405 2009-02-04 14:39:34.0 login to vote score 0
I think this crosses an uncomfortable line from learning about American History to being asked to take a side in political debate.
untrustworthy 1 2009-02-04 14:39:53.0 login to vote score 4

bxrwxr 2042 2009-02-04 14:40:23.0 login to vote score 4

sunofsam 241 2009-02-04 14:40:32.0 login to vote score 0
mutilato: I think this crosses an uncomfortable line from learning about American History to being asked to take a side in political debate.

Why? Cause you drew pictures of the president in class? So what?
kswheels 4583 2009-02-04 14:40:33.0 login to vote score 0
When I was in 2nd grade we had to draw pictures of black heroes during black history month. One kid used a black crayon.
fatsean 3838 2009-02-04 14:40:51.0 login to vote score 1
mutilato: I think this crosses an uncomfortable line from learning about American History to being asked to take a side in political debate.

What debate? The coloring was for the inauguration. The issue was decided by the people long before this coloring assignment.
smoke 420 2009-02-04 14:41:33.0 login to vote score 0

"if my name was Dick Organsack"


tag accepted


mutilato 405 2009-02-04 14:42:44.0 login to vote score 0
fatsean: What debate? The coloring was for the inauguration. The issue was decided by the people long before this coloring assignment.

The one picture in particular looks very very much like a campaign button. it isn't celebrating the office of president, but the person who just won the presidency.
untrustworthy 1 2009-02-04 14:43:20.0 login to vote score 0
mutilato: I think this crosses an uncomfortable line from learning about American History to being asked to take a side in political debate.

Yeah, but it was about the inauguration. I could see the issue if it was about the election, but there's not much debate about the fact that he's our president.
nerd by proxy 4296 2009-02-04 14:43:23.0 login to vote score 3
No, having students color pictures of our new president is not "going to far." If that's going too far, perhaps teachers shouldn't be allowed to even mention B. Hussein O.'s name in a classroom setting, since their tone of voice will indicate their evil unionized liberal commie Islamofascist support of president B. Hussein O. After all, every time one uses B. Hussein O.'s name in anything but a totally robotic neutral tone isn't one betraying one's liberal bias? Ridiculous.


bxrwxr 2042 2009-02-04 14:44:47.0 login to vote score 0
You're all full of shit...
sunofsam 241 2009-02-04 14:45:19.0 login to vote score 0
mutilato: The one picture in particular looks very very much like a campaign button. it isn't celebrating the office of president, but the person who just won the presidency.

How in the fuck do you know this from the minuscule obviously slanted information presented in the article?
mrtoast 28 2009-02-04 14:46:48.0 login to vote score 0
Nothing wrong with this. I assume the teachers had the kids drawing GW the last 8 years.
skyscraper 206 2009-02-04 14:46:52.0 login to vote score 0
Wait, Obama isn't really brown is he?
mutilato 405 2009-02-04 14:48:58.0 login to vote score 0
untrustworthy: Yeah, but it was about the inauguration. I could see the issue if it was about the election, but there's not much debate about the fact that he's our president.

No. But the "Students for Obama 2008" is clearly a campaign reference. I think this crosses the line.
farkmeblind 482 2009-02-04 14:49:01.0 login to vote score 1
skyscraper: Wait, Obama isn't really brown is he?

to the paint chip mines!
feepness 1629 2009-02-04 14:50:20.0 login to vote score 1
I think it was the "Student for Obama" that was the problem.

Not all students were for Obama.

Though I suppose if the students were given a choice of what to color that would be fine.

Maybe they could draw "Student for McConnell" too.

Or they could do Palin and color with lipstick.
untrustworthy 1 2009-02-04 14:52:16.0 login to vote score 1
mutilato: No. But the "Students for Obama 2008" is clearly a campaign reference. I think this crosses the line.

Ok, I just did a quick search and found that the company that issued the coloring pages received the artwork and permission from the Obama-Biden t-shirt store. I'm more inclined to agree with you now in that they crossed a line, but it was a very silly line and they only just barely crossed it.
bxrwxr 2042 2009-02-04 14:52:53.0 login to vote score 0
skyscraper: Wait, Obama isn't really brown is he?

One doesn't have to be black to be "black".
mutilato 405 2009-02-04 14:53:41.0 login to vote score 1
untrustworthy: Ok, I just did a quick search and found that the company that issued the coloring pages received the artwork and permission from the Obama-Biden t-shirt store. I'm more inclined to agree with you now in that they crossed a line, but it was a very silly line and they only just barely crossed it.

I agree that it's a silly line and it was barely crossed, but it was crossed, in my opinion, and we have to be careful when teaching kids how to think we don't teach them what to think.
untrustworthy 1 2009-02-04 14:54:55.0 login to vote score 1
mutilato: I agree that it's a silly line and it was barely crossed, but it was crossed, in my opinion, and we have to be careful when teaching kids how to think we don't teach them what to think.

Good point, and I think you're right. I don't think anyone was truly hurt by this, but good on the kids that raised their voices in some opposition. It ultimately lead to an even more important lesson in the end.
notsuebhoney 76 2009-02-04 14:55:09.0 login to vote score 2
keerbip: We colored pictures of Reagan when I was a kid.

New Rochelle Superintendent of Schools Richard Organisciak, an Obama supporter, did not respond to emails requesting comment.

I wouldn't respond either if my name was Dick Organsack.


I had an administrator whose name was Richard Haycock when I was in school. We all called him Straw Balls.
skyscraper 206 2009-02-04 14:55:38.0 login to vote score 2
untrustworthy:
It ultimately lead to an even more important lesson in the end.


Whining gets your name in the paper?
vet_curm 1500 2009-02-04 14:56:00.0 login to vote score 1
untrustworthy:
but it was a very silly line



gradivus 3607 2009-02-04 14:56:27.0 login to vote score 2
Where does the constitution say "separation of state and state"? They drew a picture of the president, I wouldnt give a fuck if it was W as he WAS a president. This is a non-story that is being made into a mountain so butthurt fundy/republican pricks have something to bitch about to rally the base.
mutilato 405 2009-02-04 14:56:35.0 login to vote score 0
untrustworthy: Good point, and I think you're right. I don't think anyone was truly hurt by this, but good on the kids that raised their voices in some opposition. It ultimately lead to an even more important lesson in the end.

if a lesson is all these kids are getting in their end, that makes this actually an above average school experience.
someone who may or may not be Laura Antoniou 2009-02-04 14:58:09.0 login to vote score 0
mutilato: if a lesson is all these kids are getting in their end, that makes this actually an above average school experience.

BOOOO HISSSS
abbynormal 1917 2009-02-04 15:02:30.0 login to vote score 2
Who cares who a second grader thinks should have won the election?

This is a good chance to teach kids about how life isn't fair, and how to deal with disappointment.
vushtrriboy 3085 2009-02-04 15:09:14.0 login to vote score 0
Unfuckingreal.
strayling 20 2009-02-04 15:09:43.0 login to vote score 0
abbynormal: Who cares who a second grader thinks should have won the election?

This is a good chance to teach kids about how life isn't fair, and how to deal with disappointment.


Maybe we could get McCain to teach their class. That way they'd learn to be careful what they wish for.
brainarrhea 3405 2009-02-04 15:14:15.0 login to vote score 2
mutilato: I think this crosses an uncomfortable line from learning about American History to being asked to take a side in political debate.

He's the President, like it or not. If this had been assigned to the children BEFORE he was elected I could see how some people might whine, as long as there weren't McCain pictures to color as well.

Or are you suggesting that elementary schools should teach children not to respect the President? Should they have given them a "Students against Obama" coloring page as well and told them to select one?

Why not give an option to burn the flag on a daily basis instead of saluting it then?

I am not sure where you went to school, but my elementary school indoctrination was always pro-America and pro-President, no matter who the president was at the time or what shameful things my country was responsible for. I may not now agree with everything they taught me, but the fundamental nationalistic brainwashing was started at an early age. How can anyone be surprised at this?
farkmeblind 482 2009-02-04 15:18:11.0 login to vote score 1
brainarrhea: He's the President, like it or not. If this had been assigned to the children BEFORE he was elected I could see how some people might whine, as long as there weren't McCain pictures to color as well.

Or are you suggesting that elementary schools should teach children not to respect the President? Should they have given them a "Students against Obama" coloring page as well and told them to select one?

Why not give an option to burn the flag on a daily basis instead of saluting it then?

I am not sure where you went to school, but my elementary school indoctrination was always pro-America and pro-President, no matter who the president was at the time or what shameful things my country was responsible for. I may not now agree with everything they taught me, but the fundamental nationalistic brainwashing was started at an early age. How can anyone be surprised at this?


I've always been told (especially over the last 8 years)that one salutes the uniform, not the individual wearing it.

If that has changed just because the man in the uniform has changed, I guess we know just how shallowly that river of patriotism runs.
brazil 316 2009-02-04 15:21:56.0 login to vote score 1
The state must start early. Left and Right want everyone more dependent on the power of the state.


If you logged in, you could post here.