Oh my goodness, we've allegedly been sued!
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : abbynormal is spartacus , alt army assemble , an bad lawyer , anals of internets hurrstory , as my ej0 gently faps , asesome at the guitare , asspipe , attorney at lol , bag balm , balls are enoryious , banni , bawwsalmic vinaigrette , bear garden , blast femur , blowself jackoffski , bn beer and liberty fund , bon has bitch tits , bromoheteroplatonic , built a cabin of awesome , butthurt , butthurt party , bxrwxr's perforated anus , candaian chick , chucklehead , clear cut the forest , clothe your anush , clown orgy porn , clumsy , confluttershy , coprophage b. scatmatter , countersue for goatfelchery , crotch sock elvis , delimna , derpy derpshit lolyer , domed , don't sue me bro , doomed , dooomed , doooomed , dormed , duckface , eager loser desu , eager morans , elbiabjo is rakofsky , emo lawyer , enyorious basterd , expensive free advice , extrapolate your life , faggot of forestry , faggotarrant , faggotry aforethought , fiestacade , foreskin everywhere , forest of faggotry , forum of faggotry , free gay porn , free the judiciary two , free the w'peg double standard , free the winnipeg two , fuck bucks , fuck em , fuck of asshate , fuck you soledsoled , fuckjets to gonesville , gahbrone , gahbrone meltdown , gahbrone the loldoctor , gavelgavelgavel , glowinthedark mcfarmerstan , go to fuck asleep , goatfelchery , grahams is sticky , grahams is sticky fits , gramhams' sticky thread , groug hugl , h.r. poop n poop , heh , hello kitty head , hind tit sucker , holy mammarymony , i have over 9000 chernobyls , i see foreskin everywhere , idiot clown lolyer monthly , iggins' bag balm , incapable , inept , install linux , is like my aunt edna's ass , jerk is a jerk , joseph rakofsky rapes donkeys , keep fucking that chicken , liddul joey ponyfelch , lies are libel , lol bitch tits , lol macuser , lollercaust , lolsuit , lolyerly ineptitude , long thread is long , look here asspipe , lord bearpelt , made this thread sticky , meta-drama gasm , metatarrant , my bag balm , oupl grop , pasty mcsunburn , pony-felcher-assclown , pork ogler , pouring out a crusty sock , powerpoint of doooooom , pro boner , propertyrakofsky.sueshit.com , pull the plug , rage poop , rapebaby , rapeofsky , reckless disregard , red hot nut hack , red hot nuts , red hot rakofsky nuts , rueyousohard , same shit different durr , scrambling the fuckjets , self-ass-kicking contest , serial asynchronous dicks , sniff you crotch , sniff you hard , someone tag my bag , someone tag my bag balm , sparkly hello kitty head , sparkly things , splinters in my rectum , spongefork circlespoon , spongegirl likes them big , sporkfudge circlepoon , sticky clusterfuck , sue me , t84's house of awesome , tag my bag balm , tag too long , take his bawwwl and go home , tarrant showed his balls , teh sith amendment , the winnipeg two , this thread is not a quick one , thought genocide , throw a fuck bucks to bn , totally cachebawwwx , ts is a furry , twitch awstats , unprofessional , unqualified , unskillful , untrained , vito the fluffer , vulva of doom , warponies and bawwhurr , website rape , who killed banni , with malice and hate , working boner , working pro boner , yer gonna get triffided , yo v. dawg , your mom , yuengling isn't coors What are tags? |
Comments 201 through 300 of 2801 shown.
Page
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ok, dinner time. back in 6 months!
impasse: Some fat basement hacker must have mad batch file skills to make those.
Heh.
Must be a script kiddie.
Heh.
Must be a script kiddie.
the bon_scott: Bless you for that.
Of course, right after that I'd treat you like the dirty little whore you are.
Of course, right after that I'd treat you like the dirty little whore you are.
the bon_scott: Of course, right after that I'd treat you like the dirty little whore you are.
Awww, you are such a sweetie!
Awww, you are such a sweetie!
the bon_scott: Of course, right after that I'd treat you like the dirty little whore you are.
Merlot-Thirty already?
;)
Merlot-Thirty already?
;)
WTF is with me finding giant pictures?
josephrakofsky.com is available
impasse: Some fat basement hacker must have mad batch file skills to make those.
Heh.
Heh.
C:\MSDOS>LOLSUIT.BAT
Hahaha flashlv is so retarded that even Joseph Rakofsky wouldn't sue him. Hahaha
I also had a Bawwsalmic Vinaigrette on my tossed salad.
osirisothedead: Hahaha flashlv is so retarded that even Joseph Rakofsky wouldn't sue him. Hahaha
Aren't retards a protected class?
Aren't retards a protected class?
osirisothedead: Hahaha flashlv is so retarded that even Joseph Rakofsky wouldn't sue him. Hahaha
flashlv has balls, more than many, and you shouldn't mock him for that.
flashlv has balls, more than many, and you shouldn't mock him for that.
the bon_scott: flashlv has balls, more than many, and you shouldn't mock him for that.
Yes, usually on his chin.
Yes, usually on his chin.
spongegirl circleskirt: I also had a Bawwsalmic Vinaigrette on my tossed salad.
Ouch, that would sting.
And no, I don't know how I know that.
Ouch, that would sting.
And no, I don't know how I know that.
Still good stuff going on at memegenerator
finnley wren:
n this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the lolsuits.
n this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the lolsuits.
the bon_scott: flashlv has balls, more than many, and you shouldn't mock him for that.
osirisothedead: Yes, usually on his chin.
It's not a coincidence that people hanging around internet message boards are usually demanding others to pick up their lazy slack.
osirisothedead: Yes, usually on his chin.
It's not a coincidence that people hanging around internet message boards are usually demanding others to pick up their lazy slack.
Hey everyone...
I can't say too much about this right now because it's currently in litigation. The bNer in me wants to comment right now, but unfortunately, the lawyer in me knows better.
I will offer this:
I have retained attorneys Marc Randazza and Eric Turkewitz to defend me. Marc is a very well respected attorney whose practice is focused on First Amendment law. Google him.
Regarding the case, read Eric Turkewitz's blog to review the court filings:
http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/2011/06/rakofsky-v-internet-first-motion.html
In particular, read the Turkewitz affidavit and the trial transcript and you'll get the gist.
According to Judge Jackson, who presided over the Deaner case:
"I must say that even when I acquired (sic) of Mr. Deaner, I — as to whether or not, when the Court found out through opening, at least near the end of the opening statement, which went on at some length for over an hour, that Mr. Rakofsky had never tried a case before. And, quite frankly, it was evident, in the portions of the trial that I saw, that Mr. Rakofsky – - put it this way: I was astonished that someone would purport to represent someone in a felony murder case who had never tried a case before and that local counsel, Mr. Grigsby, was complicit in this.
It appeared to the Court that there were theories out there – - defense theories out there, but the inability to execute those theories. It was apparent to the Court that there was a — not good grasp of legal principles and legal procedure of what was admissible and what was not admissible that inured, I think, to the detriment of Mr. Deaner. And had there been – - If there had been a conviction in this case, based on what I had seen so far, I would have granted a motion for a new trial under 23.110.
So I am going to grant Mr. Deaner’s request for new counsel. I believe both — it is a choice that he has knowingly and intelligently made and he has understood that it’s a waiver of his rights. Alternatively, I would find that they are based on my observation of the conduct of the trial manifest necessity. I believe that the performance was below what any reasonable person could expect in a murder trial."
(bold emphasis added by me, not the court)
Compare to the Washington Post articles:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-superior-court-judge-declares-mistrial-over-attorneys-competence-in-murder-case/2011/04/01/AFlymrJC_story.html?hpid=z8
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/woman-pays-7700-to-grandsons-attorney-who-was-later-removed-for-inexperience/2011/04/08/AF15DY9C_story.html
Rakofsky complains that:
"On April 23, 2011, BANNED VENTURES and BANNI through
TARRANT 84, with malice and hate, in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information gathering and dissemination ordinarily followed by responsible parties, in reckless disregard for the truth, published in their article entitled, "How to Pay for a Lawyer, by t84," that "The judge declared a mistrial
because he was so bad -- something that never ever happens." However, the record is clear that RAKOFSKY requested that he be permitted to withdraw as lead counsel for the defendant and was so permitted, and that Judge Jackson granted RAKOFSKY's motion solely because RAKOFSKY moved for his own withdrawal because a conflict existed between him and his client, and Judge Jackson did not grant a mistrial, either in whole or in part because RAKOFSKY was "so bad," something that, whether it "never ever happens" did not occur in the case referred to in their article."
I offer no other comment except that I suspect this trip to the courthouse will end as well as his first trial did.
Sincerely,
~t84
I can't say too much about this right now because it's currently in litigation. The bNer in me wants to comment right now, but unfortunately, the lawyer in me knows better.
I will offer this:
I have retained attorneys Marc Randazza and Eric Turkewitz to defend me. Marc is a very well respected attorney whose practice is focused on First Amendment law. Google him.
Regarding the case, read Eric Turkewitz's blog to review the court filings:
http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/2011/06/rakofsky-v-internet-first-motion.html
In particular, read the Turkewitz affidavit and the trial transcript and you'll get the gist.
According to Judge Jackson, who presided over the Deaner case:
"I must say that even when I acquired (sic) of Mr. Deaner, I — as to whether or not, when the Court found out through opening, at least near the end of the opening statement, which went on at some length for over an hour, that Mr. Rakofsky had never tried a case before. And, quite frankly, it was evident, in the portions of the trial that I saw, that Mr. Rakofsky – - put it this way: I was astonished that someone would purport to represent someone in a felony murder case who had never tried a case before and that local counsel, Mr. Grigsby, was complicit in this.
It appeared to the Court that there were theories out there – - defense theories out there, but the inability to execute those theories. It was apparent to the Court that there was a — not good grasp of legal principles and legal procedure of what was admissible and what was not admissible that inured, I think, to the detriment of Mr. Deaner. And had there been – - If there had been a conviction in this case, based on what I had seen so far, I would have granted a motion for a new trial under 23.110.
So I am going to grant Mr. Deaner’s request for new counsel. I believe both — it is a choice that he has knowingly and intelligently made and he has understood that it’s a waiver of his rights. Alternatively, I would find that they are based on my observation of the conduct of the trial manifest necessity. I believe that the performance was below what any reasonable person could expect in a murder trial."
(bold emphasis added by me, not the court)
Compare to the Washington Post articles:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-superior-court-judge-declares-mistrial-over-attorneys-competence-in-murder-case/2011/04/01/AFlymrJC_story.html?hpid=z8
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/woman-pays-7700-to-grandsons-attorney-who-was-later-removed-for-inexperience/2011/04/08/AF15DY9C_story.html
Rakofsky complains that:
"On April 23, 2011, BANNED VENTURES and BANNI through
TARRANT 84, with malice and hate, in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information gathering and dissemination ordinarily followed by responsible parties, in reckless disregard for the truth, published in their article entitled, "How to Pay for a Lawyer, by t84," that "The judge declared a mistrial
because he was so bad -- something that never ever happens." However, the record is clear that RAKOFSKY requested that he be permitted to withdraw as lead counsel for the defendant and was so permitted, and that Judge Jackson granted RAKOFSKY's motion solely because RAKOFSKY moved for his own withdrawal because a conflict existed between him and his client, and Judge Jackson did not grant a mistrial, either in whole or in part because RAKOFSKY was "so bad," something that, whether it "never ever happens" did not occur in the case referred to in their article."
I offer no other comment except that I suspect this trip to the courthouse will end as well as his first trial did.
Sincerely,
~t84
I'll get the batch files warmed up. CZAR GET THOSE PONIES READY TO GO! bN is going to war!
mike.refreshment: Apparently we are the same person, so please accept this IOU for +1.
Thank you kind sir. I am also pajamas and keerbip, so you might want to see if you are them too.
Thank you kind sir. I am also pajamas and keerbip, so you might want to see if you are them too.
cannonhawk: I'll get the batch files warmed up. CZAR GET THOSE PONIES READY TO GO! bN is going to war!
flashlv: Karma I tell you. Tarrant84 threatened to sue me before on here.
I can't add any further commentary right now, but I'm going to guess that, shortly, it's going to be come clear that filing this lawsuit was a bad idea.
I invite you to read below:
http://www.crimeandfederalism.com/2011/06/a-trial-court-weighs-in-on-joseph-rakofskys-competence.html
"After your frivolous lawsuit against me is dismissed, I am going to sue you for malicious prosecution. I am going to attach leins to your property. I will reach into your bank accounts. I will fight to open any trust funds you have. If you are living in a lavish apartment, I am going to depose you to determine whether your parents are fraudulently conveying assets to you - assets I am entitled to."
I can't add any further commentary right now, but I'm going to guess that, shortly, it's going to be come clear that filing this lawsuit was a bad idea.
I invite you to read below:
http://www.crimeandfederalism.com/2011/06/a-trial-court-weighs-in-on-joseph-rakofskys-competence.html
"After your frivolous lawsuit against me is dismissed, I am going to sue you for malicious prosecution. I am going to attach leins to your property. I will reach into your bank accounts. I will fight to open any trust funds you have. If you are living in a lavish apartment, I am going to depose you to determine whether your parents are fraudulently conveying assets to you - assets I am entitled to."
Odd, no one matched 'self-ass-kicking contest'.
Rakofsky, Joseph Esq.
Rakofsky Law Firm
4400 US-9
Freehold, NJ 07728
Phone: (877) 401-1529
Contact Us
Websites associated with this firm:http://www.financialcrimelaw.com
Rakofsky Law Firm
4400 US-9
Freehold, NJ 07728
Phone: (877) 401-1529
Contact Us
Websites associated with this firm:http://www.financialcrimelaw.com
someone who may or may not be the telephone instigator
2011-06-08 16:39:12.0
login to vote
score 3
And on another topic, having nothing to do with this thread, apparently, the link to the "telephone instigator" has been broken.
However, our sources inform us that Mr. Rakoffsky is monitoring this thread, and wished to phone in his displeasure.
However, our sources inform us that Mr. Rakoffsky is monitoring this thread, and wished to phone in his displeasure.
i know you can't say much, but how can they sue you when they don't actually know who you are?
Will I get sued just for giving cool points but not if I don't actually post in this thread?
OH GODDAMMIT!!
abbynormal: i know you can't say much, but how can they sue you when they don't actually know who you are?
Same way the RIAA does. Subpoena the info.
Same way the RIAA does. Subpoena the info.
Sue B. Honey!
Could such a suit be grounds for disbarment?
tarrant84: Hey everyone...
Best of luck to you, darlin'. As ricockulous as this lawsuit sounds, getting sued is always a tad annoying.
We'll bring the warponies and bawwhurr, and after all this clears tbs will bring the merlot and we'll toast the fail that was this man's short, sad legal career.
Best of luck to you, darlin'. As ricockulous as this lawsuit sounds, getting sued is always a tad annoying.
We'll bring the warponies and bawwhurr, and after all this clears tbs will bring the merlot and we'll toast the fail that was this man's short, sad legal career.
Registrant:
Joseph Rakofsky
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: FINANCIALCRIMELAW.COM
Domain servers in listed order:
NS27.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS28.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
For complete domain details go to:
http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?Domain=FINANCIALCRIMELAW.COM
Joseph Rakofsky
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: FINANCIALCRIMELAW.COM
Domain servers in listed order:
NS27.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS28.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
For complete domain details go to:
http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?Domain=FINANCIALCRIMELAW.COM
tarrant84:
Rakofsky complains that:
"On April 23, 2011, BANNED VENTURES and BANNI through
TARRANT 84, with malice and hate...
that'll teach you to post shit SFW so it's gets picked up...
Rakofsky complains that:
"On April 23, 2011, BANNED VENTURES and BANNI through
TARRANT 84, with malice and hate...
that'll teach you to post shit SFW so it's gets picked up...
stimp: Will I get sued just for giving cool points but not if I don't actually post in this thread?
+1. You're fucked.
+1. You're fucked.
abbynormal: i know you can't say much, but how can they sue you when they don't actually know who you are?
Apparently, grahams folded like an empty suit.
Though in his defense, he has always told us he would.
(:>)
Apparently, grahams folded like an empty suit.
Though in his defense, he has always told us he would.
(:>)
totalsecurity: Rakofsky, Joseph Esq.
Rakofsky Law Firm
4400 US-9
Freehold, NJ 07728
Phone: (877) 401-1529
Contact Us
Websites associated with this firm:http://www.financialcrimelaw.com
Wow, they're 'successful' aren't they?
financialcrimelaw.com
Is this your domain?
Add hosting, email and more.
Want to buy this domain? Our Domain Buy Service can help you get it
Rakofsky Law Firm
4400 US-9
Freehold, NJ 07728
Phone: (877) 401-1529
Contact Us
Websites associated with this firm:http://www.financialcrimelaw.com
Wow, they're 'successful' aren't they?
financialcrimelaw.com
Is this your domain?
Add hosting, email and more.
Want to buy this domain? Our Domain Buy Service can help you get it
stimp: Will I get sued just for giving cool points but not if I don't actually post in this thread?
too late.
too late.
Also, some irony...
I have never threatened to sue flashlv. I told him to be careful about what he says on the internet, because if it crosses the line, you could get sued.
Like I got sued. :)
I have never threatened to sue flashlv. I told him to be careful about what he says on the internet, because if it crosses the line, you could get sued.
Like I got sued. :)
Registrant:
Joseph Rakofsky
140 Hepburn Rd. #19H
Clifton, New Jersey 07012
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: FINANCIALCRIMELAW.COM
Created on: 21-Dec-09
Expires on: 21-Dec-11
Last Updated on: 21-Dec-09
Administrative Contact:
Rakofsky, Joseph triallawyerusa@gmail.com
140 Hepburn Rd. #19H
Clifton, New Jersey 07012
United States
(917) 319-2699
Technical Contact:
Rakofsky, Joseph triallawyerusa@gmail.com
140 Hepburn Rd. #19H
Clifton, New Jersey 07012
United States
(917) 319-2699
Domain servers in listed order:
NS27.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS28.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Registry Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Status: clientRenewProhibited
Registry Status: clientTransferProhibited
Registry Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Joseph Rakofsky
140 Hepburn Rd. #19H
Clifton, New Jersey 07012
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: FINANCIALCRIMELAW.COM
Created on: 21-Dec-09
Expires on: 21-Dec-11
Last Updated on: 21-Dec-09
Administrative Contact:
Rakofsky, Joseph triallawyerusa@gmail.com
140 Hepburn Rd. #19H
Clifton, New Jersey 07012
United States
(917) 319-2699
Technical Contact:
Rakofsky, Joseph triallawyerusa@gmail.com
140 Hepburn Rd. #19H
Clifton, New Jersey 07012
United States
(917) 319-2699
Domain servers in listed order:
NS27.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS28.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Registry Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Status: clientRenewProhibited
Registry Status: clientTransferProhibited
Registry Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Wow. It was a big day around here.
I'm always bored with lawsuits from eager losers. It's a cost of doing business. Especially when it's a dumbfuck kid with absolutely nothing intelligent to say. He might as well be a full-time bNer.
tarrant84: Also, some irony...
I have never threatened to sue flashlv. I told him to be careful about what he says on the internet, because if it crosses the line, you could get sued.
Like I got sued. :)
And as head park ranger of the National Forests of Faggotry you'll be hearing from me next.
I have never threatened to sue flashlv. I told him to be careful about what he says on the internet, because if it crosses the line, you could get sued.
Like I got sued. :)
And as head park ranger of the National Forests of Faggotry you'll be hearing from me next.
the bon_scott: Especially when it's a dumbfuck kid with absolutely nothing intelligent to say. He might as well be a full-time bNer.
If he has half a sense of humor at all, he'll join us and no doubt be welcomed with open arms.
Not counting on it, however.
If he has half a sense of humor at all, he'll join us and no doubt be welcomed with open arms.
Not counting on it, however.
tarrant84: Also, some irony...
I have never threatened to sue flashlv. I told him to be careful about what he says on the internet, because if it crosses the line, you could get sued.
Like I got sued. :)
Once the bullshit gets flushed this is going to be an epic conversation topic.
I have never threatened to sue flashlv. I told him to be careful about what he says on the internet, because if it crosses the line, you could get sued.
Like I got sued. :)
Once the bullshit gets flushed this is going to be an epic conversation topic.
finnley wren: Apparently, grahams folded like an empty suit.
Though in his defense, he has always told us he would.
(:>)
what a dickwad
Though in his defense, he has always told us he would.
(:>)
what a dickwad
l.darte: Google knows all
There seems to be a lot of links about this tard and his legal expertise.
Careful, the tards will come after you for defimation... would you want to be equated with this, ahem, lad?
There seems to be a lot of links about this tard and his legal expertise.
Careful, the tards will come after you for defimation... would you want to be equated with this, ahem, lad?
FWIW I actually like flash and I enjoy debating with him... I don't think this stuff too personally. Hopefully when this is over we'll have a bN party and I can buy him a beer or something.
mike.refreshment: Careful, the tards will come after you for defimation... would you want to be equated with this, ahem, lad?
I am considering registering a new gmail just to send him a note that says "You sir, are and idiot".
I am considering registering a new gmail just to send him a note that says "You sir, are and idiot".
From the whine complaint:
"BANNINATION.COM (hereinafter referred to as "BANNI")"
WHO KILLED BANNI?
"BANNINATION.COM (hereinafter referred to as "BANNI")"
WHO KILLED BANNI?
osirisothedead: grahams should thank him for suing. He's finally giving his new server a bit of a workout.
Grahams should put up a badge or something on the frontpage bragging about this.
Grahams should put up a badge or something on the frontpage bragging about this.
the hun: what a dickwad
Nothing he could do about it. The law is quite clear.
I don't expect him to go to jail for me.
Nothing he could do about it. The law is quite clear.
I don't expect him to go to jail for me.
tarrant84: FWIW I actually like flash and I enjoy debating with him... I don't think this stuff too personally. Hopefully when this is over we'll have a bN party and I can buy him a beer or something.
Most of the eager losers obessed with Flashlv are simply upset that he stole their thunder.
Most of the eager losers obessed with Flashlv are simply upset that he stole their thunder.
farkmeblind: I am considering registering a new gmail just to send him a note that says "You sir, are and idiot".
Tell him there are jelly fish with more brains than him for me, okay?
Tell him there are jelly fish with more brains than him for me, okay?
the bon_scott: Most of the eager losers obessed with Flashlv are simply upset that he stole their thunder.
Here we go.
Here we go.
If Rakoffsky really is monitoring the thread... as somebody that also frequently googles himself and usually finds less than positive statements, such as
"Banned for being a slanderous twat with less grasp of reality than a newborn child The. boardies were so amazed by his incredible outlook and his bizarre religion that they told him to GTFO; at which he donned his eyeliner and bitched about it on youtube."
maybe i can offer some advice on how to best deal with the situation. Don't threaten to sue people because that makes you look silly. Get yourself a notepad instead, and write down all the bad things people say about you and give them a score out of five on the mean-o-meter.
"Banned for being a slanderous twat with less grasp of reality than a newborn child The. boardies were so amazed by his incredible outlook and his bizarre religion that they told him to GTFO; at which he donned his eyeliner and bitched about it on youtube."
maybe i can offer some advice on how to best deal with the situation. Don't threaten to sue people because that makes you look silly. Get yourself a notepad instead, and write down all the bad things people say about you and give them a score out of five on the mean-o-meter.
finnley wren: Nothing he could do about it. The law is quite clear.
I don't expect him to go to jail for me.
I was talking about you.
I don't expect him to go to jail for me.
I was talking about you.
selectivedisclosure: LOL. It was fun to have me, Grahams, Tarrant and Injuryprone on a conference call. Talk about a slew of accents.
Did you get grahams to say she canna take much more captain?
Did you get grahams to say she canna take much more captain?
cannonhawk: Grahams should put up a badge or something on the frontpage bragging about this.
Awesome idea.
bN badges.
Just like the Boy Scouts, except with less derp.
Awesome idea.
bN badges.
Just like the Boy Scouts, except with less derp.
This guy is saying some of the same stuff I seem to remember tarrant saying in the aforementioned thread - that this douchenozzle is more a symptom of too many lolyers being unable to get a job at a firm, and deciding that being their own boss can't be that hard... right?
300 get
Comments 201 through 300 of 2801 shown.
Page
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
If you logged in, you could post here.