RON PAUL asks why Americans can't put marijuana in our lungs, penises in our rectums, babies in our stomachs
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : ron paul , smoked baby rectums What are tags? |
Mmmmm... smoked baby rectums...
RON PAUL asks why Americans can't put marijuana in our lungs, penises in our rectums, babies in our stomachs*
*as long as you are white
*as long as you are white
Yay
Considering that RON PAUL is a doctor, he should know that sticking penises in rectums won't result in babies in bellies which of course can't happen either unless you ate the baby which would probably be unhealthy and the act of a person under the influence of a narcotic or hallucinogen like marijuana.
RON PAUL
RON PAUL
What's left to be said? bN libs will vote for the fascist candidate every single time and the CIA would axe him if he actually came close to the presidency.
czarangelus: What's left to be said? bN libs will vote for the fascist candidate every single time and the CIA would axe him if he actually came close to the presidency.
Which one is the "fascist candidate"? I'm not sure how to vote!
Which one is the "fascist candidate"? I'm not sure how to vote!
abbynormal: Which one is the "fascist candidate"? I'm not sure how to vote!
Obama, Romney, Santorum, Gingrich for starters.
Obama, Romney, Santorum, Gingrich for starters.
RON PAUL asks why American's can't discriminate each other based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
czarangelus: Obama, Romney, Santorum, Gingrich for starters.
So "all of them"?
meh, I'm voting for my cat.
So "all of them"?
meh, I'm voting for my cat.
czarangelus: What's left to be said? bN libs will vote for the fascist candidate every single time and the CIA would axe him if he actually came close to the presidency.
So you won't be voting this year, right?
So you won't be voting this year, right?
fatsean: RON PAUL asks why American's can't discriminate each other based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
fatsean: RON PAUL asks why American's can't discriminate each other based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
Because laws sure fix that!
fatsean: So you won't be voting this year, right?
You know that feeling you get when all you've put down your throat in the past 24 hours is a $4 taqueria combination plate and 11 cheap beers? And how you're sitting in front of your computer feeling okay one second, and then literally the next second YOU MUST BE ON THE TOILET RIGHT NOW. And you go, and you get your pants off just in time, throw yourself back into the seat and fucking piss out your asshole for twenty seconds straight?
That's how I feel about voting in this election.
Because laws sure fix that!
fatsean: So you won't be voting this year, right?
You know that feeling you get when all you've put down your throat in the past 24 hours is a $4 taqueria combination plate and 11 cheap beers? And how you're sitting in front of your computer feeling okay one second, and then literally the next second YOU MUST BE ON THE TOILET RIGHT NOW. And you go, and you get your pants off just in time, throw yourself back into the seat and fucking piss out your asshole for twenty seconds straight?
That's how I feel about voting in this election.
untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
WHAT IF THEY BRING THEIR OWN BONG??
WHAT IF THEY BRING THEIR OWN BONG??
czarangelus: Because laws sure fix that!
You know that feeling you get when all you've put down your throat in the past 24 hours is a $4 taqueria combination plate and 11 cheap beers? And how you're sitting in front of your computer feeling okay one second, and then literally the next second YOU MUST BE ON THE TOILET RIGHT NOW. And you go, and you get your pants off just in time, throw yourself back into the seat and fucking piss out your asshole for twenty seconds straight?
That's how I feel about voting in this election.
Campaign for Gary Johnson then.
You know that feeling you get when all you've put down your throat in the past 24 hours is a $4 taqueria combination plate and 11 cheap beers? And how you're sitting in front of your computer feeling okay one second, and then literally the next second YOU MUST BE ON THE TOILET RIGHT NOW. And you go, and you get your pants off just in time, throw yourself back into the seat and fucking piss out your asshole for twenty seconds straight?
That's how I feel about voting in this election.
Campaign for Gary Johnson then.
untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
RON PAUL asks why Americans businesses can't discriminate against each other citizens based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
Sorry, FTFM.
untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
RON PAUL asks why American
Sorry, FTFM.
code_7: Your cat RULES!
You say that now, but how will you feel when she's your feline overlord?
And she's breeding, soon her kind will rule you all!
You say that now, but how will you feel when she's your feline overlord?
And she's breeding, soon her kind will rule you all!
fatsean: RON PAUL asks why Americans businesses can't discriminate against each other citizens based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.Sorry, FTFM.
Dude businesses are still private property. They don't "belong to everybody" or any of that nonsense.
You want racism buddy? Here's your racism.
Oh look. It's really the government that is consistently and psychotically racist. Or blacks are just 8x more criminal.
Dude businesses are still private property. They don't "belong to everybody" or any of that nonsense.
You want racism buddy? Here's your racism.
Oh look. It's really the government that is consistently and psychotically racist. Or blacks are just 8x more criminal.
fatsean: RON PAUL asks why Americans businesses can't discriminate against each other citizens based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
Sorry, FTFM.
Actually, many private organizations are allowed to discriminate as well. There are businesses and organizations that discriminate about what sex they cater to, for example.
See, discrimination is what we do every day when we decide who we want to associate with and who we don't. Private entities aren public, by definition. If only this were more broadly respected...
Sorry, FTFM.
Actually, many private organizations are allowed to discriminate as well. There are businesses and organizations that discriminate about what sex they cater to, for example.
See, discrimination is what we do every day when we decide who we want to associate with and who we don't. Private entities aren public, by definition. If only this were more broadly respected...
fatsean: citizens
Civil rights extend to non-citizens. They even cover people who are here without proper immigration status.
Civil rights extend to non-citizens. They even cover people who are here without proper immigration status.
sabine: Civil rights extend to non-citizens. They even cover people who are here without proper immigration status.
untrustworthy: Actually, many private organizations are allowed to discriminate as well. There are businesses and organizations that discriminate about what sex they cater to, for example.
See, discrimination is what we do every day when we decide who we want to associate with and who we don't. Private entities aren public, by definition. If only this were more broadly respected...
Sure, there are exceptions for women. But exceptions they remain. Ron Paul would remove all protections. This is why he is an evil little clown.
untrustworthy: Actually, many private organizations are allowed to discriminate as well. There are businesses and organizations that discriminate about what sex they cater to, for example.
See, discrimination is what we do every day when we decide who we want to associate with and who we don't. Private entities aren public, by definition. If only this were more broadly respected...
Sure, there are exceptions for women. But exceptions they remain. Ron Paul would remove all protections. This is why he is an evil little clown.
If a business wants to make money using the shared infrastructure WE ALL PAY FOR, then that business doesn't get to discriminate against any one of us. It's really that simple. Couching it in the terms of "liberty" is deceptive.
fatsean: If a business wants to make money using the shared infrastructure WE ALL PAY FOR, then that business doesn't get to discriminate against any one of us. It's really that simple. Couching it in the terms of "liberty" is deceptive.
Yeah I really like where this is going. If you drive on PUBLIC ROADS, you're not allowed to do X that government doesn't like.
Yeah I really like where this is going. If you drive on PUBLIC ROADS, you're not allowed to do X that government doesn't like.
fatsean: If a business wants to make money using the shared infrastructure WE ALL PAY FOR, then that business doesn't get to discriminate against any one of us. It's really that simple. Couching it in the terms of "liberty" is deceptive.
Your home is based on the very same infrastructure yet you are allowed to discriminate against guests.
Your metric fails. Private property and organizations aren't public. Period.
Your home is based on the very same infrastructure yet you are allowed to discriminate against guests.
Your metric fails. Private property and organizations aren't public. Period.
sabine:
What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
First thing that comes to mind are mandatory minimum sentencing laws that are much harsher for crack cocaine than powder.
First thing that comes to mind are mandatory minimum sentencing laws that are much harsher for crack cocaine than powder.
burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
They canceled Different Strokes and Webster.
They canceled Different Strokes and Webster.
burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
War on drugs, closing of many public mental institutions, etc.
War on drugs, closing of many public mental institutions, etc.
burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
The War on Drugs in particular has been enforced against blacks and Latinos wildly disproportionately.
The War on Drugs in particular has been enforced against blacks and Latinos wildly disproportionately.
There's major economic factors too. The Fed prints money and the banks print money via fractional reserve banking. Then they disperse it in the form of loans, primarily to whites and middle class people. Resources are allocated by banks in such a way as to perpetuate destitution, and the printing happens so fast that honest labor can't keep up with the theft via devaluation. People are desperate, have no hope, and end up doing incredibly stupid things.
czarangelus: The War on Drugs in particular has been enforced against blacks and Latinos wildly disproportionately.
As a result
untrustworthy: Your home is based on the very same infrastructure yet you are allowed to discriminate against guests.
Your metric fails. Private property and organizations aren't public. Period.
But I am not making money from my residence. It is my residence. I am merely existing there! Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard. The existing laws back me up.
As a result
untrustworthy: Your home is based on the very same infrastructure yet you are allowed to discriminate against guests.
Your metric fails. Private property and organizations aren't public. Period.
But I am not making money from my residence. It is my residence. I am merely existing there! Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard. The existing laws back me up.
czarangelus: Yeah I really like where this is going. If you drive on PUBLIC ROADS, you're not allowed to do X that government doesn't like.
Read my response to untrustworthy. The deciding factor is personal or business. Businesses are not people.
Read my response to untrustworthy. The deciding factor is personal or business. Businesses are not people.
fatsean: Read my response to untrustworthy. The deciding factor is personal or business. Businesses are not people.
Businesses are owned by people. People who are good and people who are bad. People who ought to have the freedom to make immoral choices and reap the consequences of those choices. Laws don't make men moral. Only freedom does.
Businesses are owned by people. People who are good and people who are bad. People who ought to have the freedom to make immoral choices and reap the consequences of those choices. Laws don't make men moral. Only freedom does.
fatsean: Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard.
So a nonprofit Aryan Nation soup kitchen that refuses to serve nonwhites would be OK with you?
So a nonprofit Aryan Nation soup kitchen that refuses to serve nonwhites would be OK with you?
fatsean: As a result
But I am not making money from my residence. It is my residence. I am merely existing there! Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard. The existing laws back me up.
Citing existing laws is t much of an argument as many existing law is bullshit.
But I am not making money from my residence. It is my residence. I am merely existing there! Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard. The existing laws back me up.
Citing existing laws is t much of an argument as many existing law is bullshit.
czarangelus: Businesses are owned by people. People who are good and people who are bad. People who ought to have the freedom to make immoral choices and reap the consequences of those choices. Laws don't make men moral. Only freedom does.
That's nice and all but these businesses benefit from protections that an individual does not get. You can incorporate your business and the government will protect your personal funds from your businesses creditors. That's just one more reason to prevent a business from discriminating against citizens.
That's nice and all but these businesses benefit from protections that an individual does not get. You can incorporate your business and the government will protect your personal funds from your businesses creditors. That's just one more reason to prevent a business from discriminating against citizens.
untrustworthy: Citing existing laws is t much of an argument as many existing law is bullshit.
Knew I shouldn't have put in that last sentence, but I stand by the rest.
Knew I shouldn't have put in that last sentence, but I stand by the rest.
fatsean: That's nice and all but these businesses benefit from protections that an individual does not get. You can incorporate your business and the government will protect your personal funds from your businesses creditors. That's just one more reason to prevent a business from discriminating against citizens.
I don't see how that follows, though I agree that corporate law needs a rebuild. Separating personal and business bank accounts isn't one of the problems however.
I don't see how that follows, though I agree that corporate law needs a rebuild. Separating personal and business bank accounts isn't one of the problems however.
czarangelus: I don't see how that follows, though I agree that corporate law needs a rebuild. Separating personal and business bank accounts isn't one of the problems however.
I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.
I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.
fatsean: Knew I shouldn't have put in that last sentence, but I stand by the rest.
Making money doesn't mean we should be sacrificing our rights of free association. Every business does discriminate in some form. It's why they focus on particular demographics.
Also, many organizations are not money making entities. So that metric fails too.
Making money doesn't mean we should be sacrificing our rights of free association. Every business does discriminate in some form. It's why they focus on particular demographics.
Also, many organizations are not money making entities. So that metric fails too.
fatsean: I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.
Owning a business is an extension of personal rights, and it should be just as free of coercion and molestation as our bodies are meant to be.
Owning a business is an extension of personal rights, and it should be just as free of coercion and molestation as our bodies are meant to be.
fatsean: I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.
Private property isn't a shared resource.
Private property isn't a shared resource.
czarangelus: Owning a business is an extension of personal rights, and it should be just as free of coercion and molestation as our bodies are meant to be.
I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.
I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.
fatsean: I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.
Businesses fund that infrastructure as well.
Businesses fund that infrastructure as well.
untrustworthy: Private property isn't a shared resource.
The roads who get the customers there. The courts which enforce the contracts that allow the business to protect itself from bad actors. The military which defends supply lines. The governmental machinations which protect IP generated by the business and protect them from foreign competition. There are numerous ways a business consumes more services than any private citizen.
The roads who get the customers there. The courts which enforce the contracts that allow the business to protect itself from bad actors. The military which defends supply lines. The governmental machinations which protect IP generated by the business and protect them from foreign competition. There are numerous ways a business consumes more services than any private citizen.
fatsean: I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.
Explain how you're intended not to use the roads the government surrounds your building with so as to preserve your rights?? They've literally blocked access, from that perspective.
Explain how you're intended not to use the roads the government surrounds your building with so as to preserve your rights?? They've literally blocked access, from that perspective.
untrustworthy: Businesses fund that infrastructure as well.
They do pay taxes. But dollar for dollar? They pay less than the private citizen while consuming more services.
They do pay taxes. But dollar for dollar? They pay less than the private citizen while consuming more services.
fatsean: The roads who get the customers there. The courts which enforce the contracts that allow the business to protect itself from bad actors. The military which defends supply lines. The governmental machinations which protect IP generated by the business and protect them from foreign competition. There are numerous ways a business consumes more services than any private citizen.
Businesses pay taxes.
Businesses pay taxes.
fatsean: They do pay taxes. But dollar for dollar? They pay less than the private citizen while consuming more services.
Horseshit.
Horseshit.
czarangelus: Explain how you're intended not to use the roads the government surrounds your building with so as to preserve your rights?? They've literally blocked access, from that perspective.
That's not my problem, that's the business' problem.
That's not my problem, that's the business' problem.
untrustworthy: Horseshit.
If you plow all the money you make back into your business, you pay no tax on it at all! Sure there are fees, but those are generally local.
If you plow all the money you make back into your business, you pay no tax on it at all! Sure there are fees, but those are generally local.
untrustworthy: Businesses pay taxes.
Why are you dissimulating? Just admit it, fatsean. YOU are driven by some mad moral crusade against racism, and you're willing to leverage the government to go to any length to stamp it out. Ignoring the fact that every government internvention into personal, moral issues has only made the matter worse. You can't impose morals on people, no matter what you wish. The best thing to do is set a good example and let the racists paint themselves out ofe xistence.
Why are you dissimulating? Just admit it, fatsean. YOU are driven by some mad moral crusade against racism, and you're willing to leverage the government to go to any length to stamp it out. Ignoring the fact that every government internvention into personal, moral issues has only made the matter worse. You can't impose morals on people, no matter what you wish. The best thing to do is set a good example and let the racists paint themselves out ofe xistence.
czarangelus: every government internvention into personal, moral issues has only made the matter worse.
Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?
Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?
sabine: Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?
Oh please. It would have disappeared all on its own.
Oh please. It would have disappeared all on its own.
sabine: Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?
It wasn't better when the government mandated segregation.
It wasn't better when the government mandated segregation.
untrustworthy: It wasn't better when the government mandated segregation.
It took an act of the federal government to stop state and local governments from doing that.
It took an act of the federal government to stop state and local governments from doing that.
abbynormal: You say that now, but how will you feel when she's your feline overlord?
And she's breeding, soon her kind will rule you all!
And she's breeding, soon her kind will rule you all!
sabine: It took an act of the federal government to stop state and local governments from doing that.
Which was good. Governments should not be allowed to discriminate. They are inherently public.
Which was good. Governments should not be allowed to discriminate. They are inherently public.
If you logged in, you could post here.