Hide Comments Below
  • -3
  • -2
  • -1
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • off
  • RON PAUL asks why Americans can't put marijuana in our lungs, penises in our rectums, babies in our stomachs



    Comment 0
    Cool
  • vote cool
  • vote uncool
  • Terms of Service Violation
  • strike inappropriate
  • not inappropriate
  • Other
  • sunlight
  • kick from thread
  • get permlink
  • Tagged with : ron paul , smoked baby rectums

    What are tags?
    impasse 820 2012-02-17 12:25:16.0 login to vote score 5
    Mmmmm... smoked baby rectums...
    bake 2096 2012-02-17 12:26:01.0 login to vote score 1
    RON PAUL asks why Americans can't put marijuana in our lungs, penises in our rectums, babies in our stomachs*





















































    *as long as you are white
    space 649 2012-02-17 12:29:17.0 login to vote score 0
    eddyatwork 998 2012-02-17 13:03:53.0 login to vote score 4
    Considering that RON PAUL is a doctor, he should know that sticking penises in rectums won't result in babies in bellies which of course can't happen either unless you ate the baby which would probably be unhealthy and the act of a person under the influence of a narcotic or hallucinogen like marijuana.

    RON PAUL
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 13:18:58.0 login to vote score 0
    What's left to be said? bN libs will vote for the fascist candidate every single time and the CIA would axe him if he actually came close to the presidency.
    abbynormal 1917 2012-02-17 13:25:39.0 login to vote score 2
    czarangelus: What's left to be said? bN libs will vote for the fascist candidate every single time and the CIA would axe him if he actually came close to the presidency.

    Which one is the "fascist candidate"? I'm not sure how to vote!
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 13:26:30.0 login to vote score 0
    abbynormal: Which one is the "fascist candidate"? I'm not sure how to vote!

    Obama, Romney, Santorum, Gingrich for starters.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 13:28:08.0 login to vote score 2
    RON PAUL asks why American's can't discriminate each other based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
    abbynormal 1917 2012-02-17 13:28:08.0 login to vote score 4
    czarangelus: Obama, Romney, Santorum, Gingrich for starters.

    So "all of them"?

    meh, I'm voting for my cat.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 13:28:37.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: What's left to be said? bN libs will vote for the fascist candidate every single time and the CIA would axe him if he actually came close to the presidency.

    So you won't be voting this year, right?
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 13:30:52.0 login to vote score 3
    fatsean: RON PAUL asks why American's can't discriminate each other based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.

    Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 13:31:09.0 login to vote score 2
    fatsean: RON PAUL asks why American's can't discriminate each other based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.

    Because laws sure fix that!

    fatsean: So you won't be voting this year, right?

    You know that feeling you get when all you've put down your throat in the past 24 hours is a $4 taqueria combination plate and 11 cheap beers? And how you're sitting in front of your computer feeling okay one second, and then literally the next second YOU MUST BE ON THE TOILET RIGHT NOW. And you go, and you get your pants off just in time, throw yourself back into the seat and fucking piss out your asshole for twenty seconds straight?

    That's how I feel about voting in this election.
    shocker 99 2012-02-17 13:32:45.0 login to vote score 2
    untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.


    WHAT IF THEY BRING THEIR OWN BONG??
    code_7 6865 2012-02-17 13:35:19.0 login to vote score 2


    "It was like, far out man..."
    shocker 99 2012-02-17 13:37:10.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: Because laws sure fix that!

    You know that feeling you get when all you've put down your throat in the past 24 hours is a $4 taqueria combination plate and 11 cheap beers? And how you're sitting in front of your computer feeling okay one second, and then literally the next second YOU MUST BE ON THE TOILET RIGHT NOW. And you go, and you get your pants off just in time, throw yourself back into the seat and fucking piss out your asshole for twenty seconds straight?

    That's how I feel about voting in this election.



    Campaign for Gary Johnson then.


    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 13:38:30.0 login to vote score 1
    untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.


    untrustworthy: Actually, you can. If you don't want to invite the Jehovah's witnesses into your home because of their religion, you don't have to.

    RON PAUL asks why Americans businesses can't discriminate against each other citizens based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.

    Sorry, FTFM.
    code_7 6865 2012-02-17 13:39:16.0 login to vote score 0
    abbynormal: So "all of them"?

    meh, I'm voting for my cat.


    Your cat RULES!
    abbynormal 1917 2012-02-17 13:41:03.0 login to vote score 1
    code_7: Your cat RULES!

    You say that now, but how will you feel when she's your feline overlord?

    And she's breeding, soon her kind will rule you all!
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 13:42:23.0 login to vote score 2
    fatsean: RON PAUL asks why Americans businesses can't discriminate against each other citizens based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.Sorry, FTFM.

    Dude businesses are still private property. They don't "belong to everybody" or any of that nonsense.

    You want racism buddy? Here's your racism.



    Oh look. It's really the government that is consistently and psychotically racist. Or blacks are just 8x more criminal.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 13:45:41.0 login to vote score 1
    fatsean: RON PAUL asks why Americans businesses can't discriminate against each other citizens based on sex, race, sexual orientation, religion or creed.

    Sorry, FTFM.


    Actually, many private organizations are allowed to discriminate as well. There are businesses and organizations that discriminate about what sex they cater to, for example.

    See, discrimination is what we do every day when we decide who we want to associate with and who we don't. Private entities aren public, by definition. If only this were more broadly respected...
    sabine 745 2012-02-17 13:49:10.0 login to vote score 1
    fatsean: citizens

    Civil rights extend to non-citizens. They even cover people who are here without proper immigration status.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 13:59:30.0 login to vote score 1
    sabine: Civil rights extend to non-citizens. They even cover people who are here without proper immigration status.


    untrustworthy: Actually, many private organizations are allowed to discriminate as well. There are businesses and organizations that discriminate about what sex they cater to, for example.

    See, discrimination is what we do every day when we decide who we want to associate with and who we don't. Private entities aren public, by definition. If only this were more broadly respected...


    Sure, there are exceptions for women. But exceptions they remain. Ron Paul would remove all protections. This is why he is an evil little clown.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:00:19.0 login to vote score 0
    If a business wants to make money using the shared infrastructure WE ALL PAY FOR, then that business doesn't get to discriminate against any one of us. It's really that simple. Couching it in the terms of "liberty" is deceptive.

    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:07:23.0 login to vote score 1
    fatsean: If a business wants to make money using the shared infrastructure WE ALL PAY FOR, then that business doesn't get to discriminate against any one of us. It's really that simple. Couching it in the terms of "liberty" is deceptive.

    Yeah I really like where this is going. If you drive on PUBLIC ROADS, you're not allowed to do X that government doesn't like.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:07:43.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: If a business wants to make money using the shared infrastructure WE ALL PAY FOR, then that business doesn't get to discriminate against any one of us. It's really that simple. Couching it in the terms of "liberty" is deceptive.

    Your home is based on the very same infrastructure yet you are allowed to discriminate against guests.

    Your metric fails. Private property and organizations aren't public. Period.
    burntman 1528 2012-02-17 14:08:08.0 login to vote score 0
    sabine:

    What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?
    brazil 316 2012-02-17 14:09:29.0 login to vote score 1
    abbynormal: Which one is the "fascist candidate"? I'm not sure how to vote!


    sabine 745 2012-02-17 14:10:00.0 login to vote score 4
    burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?

    First thing that comes to mind are mandatory minimum sentencing laws that are much harsher for crack cocaine than powder.
    brazil 316 2012-02-17 14:12:37.0 login to vote score 1
    burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?

    They canceled Different Strokes and Webster.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:12:52.0 login to vote score 2
    burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?

    War on drugs, closing of many public mental institutions, etc.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:14:06.0 login to vote score 1
    burntman: What was introduced mid 80's to cause the huge rise in the black prison population as per czars graph? Are there any specific laws?

    The War on Drugs in particular has been enforced against blacks and Latinos wildly disproportionately.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:16:21.0 login to vote score 0
    There's major economic factors too. The Fed prints money and the banks print money via fractional reserve banking. Then they disperse it in the form of loans, primarily to whites and middle class people. Resources are allocated by banks in such a way as to perpetuate destitution, and the printing happens so fast that honest labor can't keep up with the theft via devaluation. People are desperate, have no hope, and end up doing incredibly stupid things.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:17:42.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: The War on Drugs in particular has been enforced against blacks and Latinos wildly disproportionately.

    As a result
    untrustworthy: Your home is based on the very same infrastructure yet you are allowed to discriminate against guests.

    Your metric fails. Private property and organizations aren't public. Period.


    But I am not making money from my residence. It is my residence. I am merely existing there! Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard. The existing laws back me up.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:18:23.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: Yeah I really like where this is going. If you drive on PUBLIC ROADS, you're not allowed to do X that government doesn't like.

    Read my response to untrustworthy. The deciding factor is personal or business. Businesses are not people.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:19:12.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: Read my response to untrustworthy. The deciding factor is personal or business. Businesses are not people.

    Businesses are owned by people. People who are good and people who are bad. People who ought to have the freedom to make immoral choices and reap the consequences of those choices. Laws don't make men moral. Only freedom does.
    sabine 745 2012-02-17 14:20:05.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard.

    So a nonprofit Aryan Nation soup kitchen that refuses to serve nonwhites would be OK with you?
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:20:19.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: As a result


    But I am not making money from my residence. It is my residence. I am merely existing there! Once you start extracting a profit from your fellow citizens using this shared infrastructure I believe that you are subject to a different standard. The existing laws back me up.


    Citing existing laws is t much of an argument as many existing law is bullshit.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:21:47.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: Businesses are owned by people. People who are good and people who are bad. People who ought to have the freedom to make immoral choices and reap the consequences of those choices. Laws don't make men moral. Only freedom does.

    That's nice and all but these businesses benefit from protections that an individual does not get. You can incorporate your business and the government will protect your personal funds from your businesses creditors. That's just one more reason to prevent a business from discriminating against citizens.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:22:15.0 login to vote score 0
    untrustworthy: Citing existing laws is t much of an argument as many existing law is bullshit.

    Knew I shouldn't have put in that last sentence, but I stand by the rest.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:23:32.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: That's nice and all but these businesses benefit from protections that an individual does not get. You can incorporate your business and the government will protect your personal funds from your businesses creditors. That's just one more reason to prevent a business from discriminating against citizens.

    I don't see how that follows, though I agree that corporate law needs a rebuild. Separating personal and business bank accounts isn't one of the problems however.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:25:06.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: I don't see how that follows, though I agree that corporate law needs a rebuild. Separating personal and business bank accounts isn't one of the problems however.

    I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:25:56.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: Knew I shouldn't have put in that last sentence, but I stand by the rest.

    Making money doesn't mean we should be sacrificing our rights of free association. Every business does discriminate in some form. It's why they focus on particular demographics.

    Also, many organizations are not money making entities. So that metric fails too.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:26:37.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.

    Owning a business is an extension of personal rights, and it should be just as free of coercion and molestation as our bodies are meant to be.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:27:15.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: I think it is fair for government, and the people who elect it, to place limitations on what a business can do. The problem I see is this whole American idea that businesses must be free to do whatever they like with our shared resources.

    Private property isn't a shared resource.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:28:22.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: Owning a business is an extension of personal rights, and it should be just as free of coercion and molestation as our bodies are meant to be.

    I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:30:07.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.

    Businesses fund that infrastructure as well.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:30:35.0 login to vote score 0
    untrustworthy: Private property isn't a shared resource.

    The roads who get the customers there. The courts which enforce the contracts that allow the business to protect itself from bad actors. The military which defends supply lines. The governmental machinations which protect IP generated by the business and protect them from foreign competition. There are numerous ways a business consumes more services than any private citizen.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:30:36.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: I disagree with that. If you want to make money off of the infrastructure I fund, they I've got a few limitations.

    Explain how you're intended not to use the roads the government surrounds your building with so as to preserve your rights?? They've literally blocked access, from that perspective.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:31:43.0 login to vote score 0
    untrustworthy: Businesses fund that infrastructure as well.

    They do pay taxes. But dollar for dollar? They pay less than the private citizen while consuming more services.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:31:50.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: The roads who get the customers there. The courts which enforce the contracts that allow the business to protect itself from bad actors. The military which defends supply lines. The governmental machinations which protect IP generated by the business and protect them from foreign competition. There are numerous ways a business consumes more services than any private citizen.

    Businesses pay taxes.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:32:05.0 login to vote score 0
    fatsean: They do pay taxes. But dollar for dollar? They pay less than the private citizen while consuming more services.

    Horseshit.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:32:29.0 login to vote score -1
    czarangelus: Explain how you're intended not to use the roads the government surrounds your building with so as to preserve your rights?? They've literally blocked access, from that perspective.

    That's not my problem, that's the business' problem.
    fatsean 3838 2012-02-17 14:33:21.0 login to vote score 0
    untrustworthy: Horseshit.

    If you plow all the money you make back into your business, you pay no tax on it at all! Sure there are fees, but those are generally local.
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:33:33.0 login to vote score 0
    untrustworthy: Businesses pay taxes.

    Why are you dissimulating? Just admit it, fatsean. YOU are driven by some mad moral crusade against racism, and you're willing to leverage the government to go to any length to stamp it out. Ignoring the fact that every government internvention into personal, moral issues has only made the matter worse. You can't impose morals on people, no matter what you wish. The best thing to do is set a good example and let the racists paint themselves out ofe xistence.
    sabine 745 2012-02-17 14:40:15.0 login to vote score 0
    czarangelus: every government internvention into personal, moral issues has only made the matter worse.

    Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?
    czarangelus 646 2012-02-17 14:43:04.0 login to vote score 0
    sabine: Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?

    Oh please. It would have disappeared all on its own.
    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 14:58:18.0 login to vote score 0
    sabine: Are you seriously suggesting that things were better when segregation was legal?

    It wasn't better when the government mandated segregation.
    sabine 745 2012-02-17 15:09:11.0 login to vote score 2
    untrustworthy: It wasn't better when the government mandated segregation.

    It took an act of the federal government to stop state and local governments from doing that.
    spongegirl circleskirt 382 2012-02-17 15:09:31.0 login to vote score 2
    abbynormal: You say that now, but how will you feel when she's your feline overlord?

    And she's breeding, soon her kind will rule you all!



    untrustworthy 1 2012-02-17 15:11:42.0 login to vote score 0
    sabine: It took an act of the federal government to stop state and local governments from doing that.

    Which was good. Governments should not be allowed to discriminate. They are inherently public.
    If you logged in, you could post here.