Democratic women seek a state ban on vasectomies for men
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : nutsucking and jizz swilling , sunlight_herup strikes again , tard vortex , the sonic dildo What are tags? |
Comments 1 through 100 of 189 shown.
Page
1
2
That's pretty funny. A shame it's not really a parallel. But then again, I wouldn't be surprised to find some religious fingersniffer trying to outlaw hysterectomies...
phil_herup: Idiot Democrat womyn making false equivalences?
Is today a day that ends in "y"?
I agree, it's a false equivalence. Instead, they should shove a giant dildo up your ass before you are able to get a vasectomy.
Is today a day that ends in "y"?
I agree, it's a false equivalence. Instead, they should shove a giant dildo up your ass before you are able to get a vasectomy.
Must whiteknight for authoritarian Republicans!!
quick1: I agree, it's a false equivalence. Instead, they should shove a giant dildo up your ass before you are able to get a vasectomy.
I think a full depth catheter up the ol' pee hole would be more equivalent.
I think a full depth catheter up the ol' pee hole would be more equivalent.
quick1: I agree, it's a false equivalence. Instead, they should shove a giant dildo up your ass before you are able to get a vasectomy.
Or they could just stop being immature reactionary children and act like adults.
Or they could just stop being immature reactionary children and act like adults.
phil_herup: Or they could just stop being immature reactionary children and act like adults.
Yes, they should just accept the government mandating an unnecessary invasive procedure. Suck it up, ladies.
Yes, they should just accept the government mandating an unnecessary invasive procedure. Suck it up, ladies.
fatsean: That's pretty funny. A shame it's not really a parallel. But then again, I wouldn't be surprised to find some religious fingersniffer trying to outlaw hysterectomies...
It's about as parallel as one can get I suppose.
It's about as parallel as one can get I suppose.
phil_herup: Democrats are Pro-Choice on abortion, but little else.
Wrong. Every person should have the choice to not be forced to breath in industrial pollutants.
Wrong. Every person should have the choice to not be forced to breath in industrial pollutants.
quick1: Yes, they should just accept the government mandating an unnecessary invasive procedure. Suck it up, ladies.
If you are just about to have an abortion, which is highly invasive, how can you say that the ultrasound, which is no where near as invasive as the abortion, is invasive?
No logic there.
If you are just about to have an abortion, which is highly invasive, how can you say that the ultrasound, which is no where near as invasive as the abortion, is invasive?
No logic there.
phil_herup: If you are just about to have an abortion, which is highly invasive, how can you say that the ultrasound, which is no where near as invasive as the abortion, is invasive?
No logic there.
It's a bullshit process that's designed to make the woman as uncomfortable as possible. It makes her jump through bureaucratic hoops, violates her body unnecessarily all so she can get to another procedure that will most definitely not be easy for her. And you think this is fine?
You fucking disgusting pig.
No logic there.
It's a bullshit process that's designed to make the woman as uncomfortable as possible. It makes her jump through bureaucratic hoops, violates her body unnecessarily all so she can get to another procedure that will most definitely not be easy for her. And you think this is fine?
You fucking disgusting pig.
phil_herup: If you are just about to have an abortion, which is highly invasive, how can you say that the ultrasound, which is no where near as invasive as the abortion, is invasive?
No logic there.
Yeah, one invasive procedure, two invasive procedures, what's the difference?
No logic there.
Yeah, one invasive procedure, two invasive procedures, what's the difference?
phil_herup: If you are just about to have an abortion, which is highly invasive, how can you say that the ultrasound, which is no where near as invasive as the abortion, is invasive?
No logic there.
What makes you think anyone has the right to decide that other than the woman once she's discussed it with her doctor?
No logic there.
What makes you think anyone has the right to decide that other than the woman once she's discussed it with her doctor?
phil_herup: If you are just about to have an abortion, which is highly invasive, how can you say that the ultrasound, which is no where near as invasive as the abortion, is invasive?
No logic there.
One is invasive by the choice of the woman and her doctor. The other is the government mandating the invasive procedure.
Based on your response to this issue, you have pretty much forfeited any claims that you are for smaller government.
No logic there.
One is invasive by the choice of the woman and her doctor. The other is the government mandating the invasive procedure.
Based on your response to this issue, you have pretty much forfeited any claims that you are for smaller government.
phil_herup's nutsucking and jizz swilling of everything republican is becoming more and more tragic.
little hands of concrete: phil_herup's nutsucking and jizz swilling of everything republican
We need government-mandated ultrasounds before nutsucking and jizz swilling is allowed.
We need government-mandated ultrasounds before nutsucking and jizz swilling is allowed.
quick1: One is invasive by the choice of the woman and her doctor. The other is the government mandating the invasive procedure.
Based on your response to this issue, you have pretty much forfeited any claims that you are for smaller government.
I am not for any type of mandate at all for anyone. That is what you like.
I just like poking at all the logical holes in lefty lib arguments, and there is no shortage of them.
I am pro-gaybortion all day long.
Based on your response to this issue, you have pretty much forfeited any claims that you are for smaller government.
I am not for any type of mandate at all for anyone. That is what you like.
I just like poking at all the logical holes in lefty lib arguments, and there is no shortage of them.
I am pro-gaybortion all day long.
keerbip: We need government-mandated ultrasounds before nutsucking and jizz swilling is allowed.
Perhaps. I mean, who else on this board sucks as much republican dick, under the guise of being a libertarian, as phil_herup?
Perhaps. I mean, who else on this board sucks as much republican dick, under the guise of being a libertarian, as phil_herup?
This should please the "sex is for procreation ONLY" crowd, at least.
phil_herup: I am not for any type of mandate at all for anyone. That is what you like.
I just like poking at all the logical holes in lefty lib arguments, and there is no shortage of them.
I am pro-gaybortion all day long.
You like poking at holes? Do you like pina colada too?
I just like poking at all the logical holes in lefty lib arguments, and there is no shortage of them.
I am pro-gaybortion all day long.
You like poking at holes? Do you like pina colada too?
phil_herup: I am not for any type of mandate at all for anyone. That is what you like.
And yet you have whiteknighted the legislation in multiple threads now, and in fact argued in support of the sonic dildo being used before an abortion.
And yet you have whiteknighted the legislation in multiple threads now, and in fact argued in support of the sonic dildo being used before an abortion.
illuminaughty: This should please the "sex is for procreation ONLY" crowd, at least.
What about the sex for recreation crowd? Sex for recreation is not a women's health issue, nor is it a right to free contraceptives.
What about the sex for recreation crowd? Sex for recreation is not a women's health issue, nor is it a right to free contraceptives.
illuminaughty: This should please the "sex is for procreation ONLY" crowd, at least.
I can totally see the fundies getting behind this bill. They should be careful how they play this game.
Fun fact: when I got snipped, my doctor told me I wouldn't have been eligible under insurance if I'd chosen the local Catholic hospital as my primary hospital under my HMO. This was in libby lib lib LA not so long ago.
I can totally see the fundies getting behind this bill. They should be careful how they play this game.
Fun fact: when I got snipped, my doctor told me I wouldn't have been eligible under insurance if I'd chosen the local Catholic hospital as my primary hospital under my HMO. This was in libby lib lib LA not so long ago.
phil_herup: What about the sex for recreation crowd? Sex for recreation is not a women's health issue, nor is it a right to free contraceptives.
What about the poking holes crowd? Poking holes for recreation is not a sex issue, nor is it a right to free access to women, laying on a medical table feet up in stirrips, holes.
What about the poking holes crowd? Poking holes for recreation is not a sex issue, nor is it a right to free access to women, laying on a medical table feet up in stirrips, holes.
phil is smrter than all of us. He just likes to poke our holes.
quinblake: phil is smrter than all of us. He just likes to poke our holes.
I'd like to poke your holes, if you know what I mean.
I'd like to poke your holes, if you know what I mean.
phil_herup: What about the sex for recreation crowd? Sex for recreation is not a women's health issue, nor is it a right to free contraceptives.
I never said it was. There are many legitimate health reasons for birth-control pills and hysterectomies. What are the legitimate health concerns addressed by boner pills and vasectomies?
I never said it was. There are many legitimate health reasons for birth-control pills and hysterectomies. What are the legitimate health concerns addressed by boner pills and vasectomies?
phil_herup: What about the sex for recreation crowd? Sex for recreation is not a women's health issue, nor is it a right to free contraceptives.
What's the matter phil? You not getting enough recreational sex? You want to deny it from the people who can't afford $100+/month for contraception? Is it a power issue for you? Or you just like the idea of poking holes?
What's the matter phil? You not getting enough recreational sex? You want to deny it from the people who can't afford $100+/month for contraception? Is it a power issue for you? Or you just like the idea of poking holes?
quick1: And yet you have whiteknighted the legislation in multiple threads now, and in fact argued in support of the sonic dildo being used before an abortion.
Phil whiteknights for most republican initiatives and tries to spin almost every democrat initiative as ill-conceived and bad for America. His shilling for republicans is all he has, I guess.
Phil whiteknights for most republican initiatives and tries to spin almost every democrat initiative as ill-conceived and bad for America. His shilling for republicans is all he has, I guess.
osirisothedead: Must whiteknight for authoritarian Republicans!!
Are you saying abortion or restricting it is a form of authoritarianism? I'm not sure how it would be.
Are you saying abortion or restricting it is a form of authoritarianism? I'm not sure how it would be.
quick1: And yet you have whiteknighted the legislation in multiple threads now, and in fact argued in support of the sonic dildo being used before an abortion.
How is he whiteknighting the legislation?
How is he whiteknighting the legislation?
quinblake: What's the matter phil? You not getting enough recreational sex? You want to deny it from the people who can't afford $100+/month for contraception?
Hey... I'll support the sex for recreation argument if you guys pay for my ski lift tickets.
That is the logical equivalent.
Hey... I'll support the sex for recreation argument if you guys pay for my ski lift tickets.
That is the logical equivalent.
quinblake: What's the matter phil? You not getting enough recreational sex? You want to deny it from the people who can't afford $100+/month for contraception? Is it a power issue for you? Or you just like the idea of poking holes?
I think birth control is about $15 - $20 a month without a prescription, and the health district gives out free condoms.
I think birth control is about $15 - $20 a month without a prescription, and the health district gives out free condoms.
phil_herup: Hey... I'll support the sex for recreation argument if you guys pay for my ski lift tickets.
That is the logical equivalent.
You're the logical equivalent to a hole poker. What's your point? Or should I say how hard is your point?
That is the logical equivalent.
You're the logical equivalent to a hole poker. What's your point? Or should I say how hard is your point?
flashlv: I think birth control is about $15 - $20 a month without a prescription, and the health district gives out free condoms.
There was an article here recently that stated a birth control pill prescription was a minimum $81/month, but that was a very low cost price. I'm just going by what I've read though.
There was an article here recently that stated a birth control pill prescription was a minimum $81/month, but that was a very low cost price. I'm just going by what I've read though.
flashlv: I think birth control is about $15 - $20 a month without a prescription, and the health district gives out free condoms.
You can't get birth control pills without a prescription.
You can't get birth control pills without a prescription.
illuminaughty: I never said it was. There are many legitimate health reasons for birth-control pills and hysterectomies. What are the legitimate health concerns addressed by boner pills and vasectomies?
You may never have said it was, but the President and Sebelius have sold this as a women's rights issue and a women's health issue.
"Sex as recreation" is neither a health issue or a rights issue in regards to free contraception. It is simply a subsidy sold under the guise of something it is not.
illuminaughty: I never said it was. There are many legitimate health reasons for birth-control pills and hysterectomies.
Absolutely. And these should be covered like any other medical issue. With a copay.
illuminaughty: What are the legitimate health concerns addressed by boner pills and vasectomies?
Nothing that the person's health insurance can't decide for its policy holders.
You may never have said it was, but the President and Sebelius have sold this as a women's rights issue and a women's health issue.
"Sex as recreation" is neither a health issue or a rights issue in regards to free contraception. It is simply a subsidy sold under the guise of something it is not.
illuminaughty: I never said it was. There are many legitimate health reasons for birth-control pills and hysterectomies.
Absolutely. And these should be covered like any other medical issue. With a copay.
illuminaughty: What are the legitimate health concerns addressed by boner pills and vasectomies?
Nothing that the person's health insurance can't decide for its policy holders.
quinblake: There was an article here recently that stated a birth control pill prescription was a minimum $81/month, but that was a very low cost price. I'm just going by what I've read though.
I used to pick up my ex-wife's birth control, no prescription, for $15.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
I used to pick up my ex-wife's birth control, no prescription, for $15.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
flashlv: I used to pick up my ex-wife's birth control, no prescription, for $15.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
LOLWUT? Where did you buy OTC birth control pills?
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
LOLWUT? Where did you buy OTC birth control pills?
quinblake: You're the logical equivalent to a hole poker. What's your point? Or should I say how hard is your point?
+10
+10
quinblake: There was an article here recently that stated a birth control pill prescription was a minimum $81/month, but that was a very low cost price. I'm just going by what I've read though.
Costs range from about $15 to about $50 depending on type of pill. No, they are not available without a prescription, though there is a movement to give that particular prescription authority to pharmacists, and it's a pretty routine prescription.
Costs range from about $15 to about $50 depending on type of pill. No, they are not available without a prescription, though there is a movement to give that particular prescription authority to pharmacists, and it's a pretty routine prescription.
sloth: Costs range from about $15 to about $50 depending on type of pill. No, they are not available without a prescription, though there is a movement to give that particular prescription authority to pharmacists, and it's a pretty routine prescription.
I think that $15-50 range is also if your insurance covers it. If not, it can be more towards the $80-100 range.
I think that $15-50 range is also if your insurance covers it. If not, it can be more towards the $80-100 range.
flashlv: I used to pick up my ex-wife's birth control, no prescription, for $15.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
I didn't think birth control pills were available without a prescription, perhaps she'd already dropped off the prescription with the pharmacist and you just had to pick up the refills. Did your wife have private insurance? A lot cover 80% at the counter so perhaps the $15 was after an 80% insurance coverage.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
I didn't think birth control pills were available without a prescription, perhaps she'd already dropped off the prescription with the pharmacist and you just had to pick up the refills. Did your wife have private insurance? A lot cover 80% at the counter so perhaps the $15 was after an 80% insurance coverage.
quick1: I think that $15-50 range is also if your insurance covers it. If not, it can be more towards the $80-100 range.
Numbers came from Planned Parenthood, so I assume they meant cost without insurance, but it wasn't specified. Chart below is unsourced, but does specify costs without insurance - and comes from an article talking about how costs are under-reported, so if they have a motivation to err, it's to err on the high side of cost.
Numbers came from Planned Parenthood, so I assume they meant cost without insurance, but it wasn't specified. Chart below is unsourced, but does specify costs without insurance - and comes from an article talking about how costs are under-reported, so if they have a motivation to err, it's to err on the high side of cost.
quinblake: There was an article here recently that stated a birth control pill prescription was a minimum $81/month, but that was a very low cost price. I'm just going by what I've read though.
Quin looks like I was a little off.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061201161009AAJKStj
Closer to $30 - $40
Quin looks like I was a little off.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061201161009AAJKStj
Closer to $30 - $40
illuminaughty: You can't get birth control pills without a prescription.
I meant without insurance, sorry about that.
I meant without insurance, sorry about that.
Back in my day we didn't use vasectomies. We just put really, really tight underwear between our legs.
quick1: I think that $15-50 range is also if your insurance covers it. If not, it can be more towards the $80-100 range.
This says different.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061201161009AAJKStj
This says different.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061201161009AAJKStj
quinblake: I didn't think birth control pills were available without a prescription, perhaps she'd already dropped off the prescription with the pharmacist and you just had to pick up the refills. Did your wife have private insurance? A lot cover 80% at the counter so perhaps the $15 was after an 80% insurance coverage.
I meant no insurance, since it wasn't covered for a short time.
It was about $15 - $20
I meant no insurance, since it wasn't covered for a short time.
It was about $15 - $20
flashlv: I meant no insurance, since it wasn't covered for a short time.
It was about $15 - $20
30-day supply? It's been a long time since I worked in a pharmacy, but I seem to remember that we rarely sold a single pack, it was usually either a 60 or 90 day supply.
It was about $15 - $20
30-day supply? It's been a long time since I worked in a pharmacy, but I seem to remember that we rarely sold a single pack, it was usually either a 60 or 90 day supply.
sloth: 30-day supply? It's been a long time since I worked in a pharmacy, but I seem to remember that we rarely sold a single pack, it was usually either a 60 or 90 day supply.
It was the small clamshell type package.
It was the small clamshell type package.
I expect there will be a fight against easier access to birth control pills. One is able to use several at once to simulate that "morning after pill" apparently. The derp and herp should be pretty vigorous on that subject.
I found the article:
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
fatsean: I expect there will be a fight against easier access to birth control pills. One is able to use several at once to simulate that "morning after pill" apparently. The derp and herp should be pretty vigorous on that subject.
I'm not sure any group is fighting to restrict access to that kind of stuff. Are there any you have heard of?
I'm not sure any group is fighting to restrict access to that kind of stuff. Are there any you have heard of?
flashlv: I used to pick up my ex-wife's birth control, no prescription, for $15.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
My ex took ortho tricyclin for a while, even with insurance and prescription it had a $20 copay for us.
orthotrycyclin lo or something like that.
My ex took ortho tricyclin for a while, even with insurance and prescription it had a $20 copay for us.
quinblake: I found the article:
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
http://health.costhelper.com/birth-control-pills.html
Typical costs:
For patients not covered by health insurance, birth control pills typically cost $20 to $50 a month.
From what I have come across it also depends on the brand.
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
http://health.costhelper.com/birth-control-pills.html
Typical costs:
For patients not covered by health insurance, birth control pills typically cost $20 to $50 a month.
From what I have come across it also depends on the brand.
grahams: My ex took ortho tricyclin for a while, even with insurance and prescription it had a $20 copay for us.
I am on Tramadol right now, and I paid my $10 co-pay and the insurance company paid $0. I thought that was weird.
I am on Tramadol right now, and I paid my $10 co-pay and the insurance company paid $0. I thought that was weird.
phil_herup: Can a red flag get any redder?
Absolutely. If the numbers came from Santorum's campaign, for example.
Absolutely. If the numbers came from Santorum's campaign, for example.
Although it is available as a generic now and should be closer to flashes price, but definitely not OTC in the US
flashlv: I am on Tramadol right now, and I paid my $10 co-pay and the insurance company paid $0. I thought that was weird.
That's particularly obnoxious. The insurance company likely negotiated a lower rate for that particular medication using their buying power.
My recent ER trip came in at just over 1500, I need to pay 352 of that and my insurer isn't paying anything, but their contract with the hospital allowed them to get that discount
That's particularly obnoxious. The insurance company likely negotiated a lower rate for that particular medication using their buying power.
My recent ER trip came in at just over 1500, I need to pay 352 of that and my insurer isn't paying anything, but their contract with the hospital allowed them to get that discount
quinblake: I found the article:
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
Also Quin, looking at other numbers I am not taking into account the doctors visit which is probably a minimum of $50 without insurance. So if we put that in we're closer to your number. but I have a feeling they can get a prescription for a year.
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
Also Quin, looking at other numbers I am not taking into account the doctors visit which is probably a minimum of $50 without insurance. So if we put that in we're closer to your number. but I have a feeling they can get a prescription for a year.
flashlv: Also Quin, looking at other numbers I am not taking into account the doctors visit which is probably a minimum of $50 without insurance. So if we put that in we're closer to your number. but I have a feeling they can get a prescription for a year.
That's a good point. If you can get to a clinic like PP then you can probably get your doctors visit for a little over $100 and a years prescription.
If you go see a mainstream GP for a visit then you are probably looking at closer to $250/yr + $20/mo.
Still not quite $81/month.
Of course the photo on that story shows yasmin which is a higher end branded bc iirc
That's a good point. If you can get to a clinic like PP then you can probably get your doctors visit for a little over $100 and a years prescription.
If you go see a mainstream GP for a visit then you are probably looking at closer to $250/yr + $20/mo.
Still not quite $81/month.
Of course the photo on that story shows yasmin which is a higher end branded bc iirc
flashlv: Also Quin, looking at other numbers I am not taking into account the doctors visit which is probably a minimum of $50 without insurance. So if we put that in we're closer to your number. but I have a feeling they can get a prescription for a year.
According to this, it's about $80/month, give or take a $5 or $10 depending on whether it's name brand.
According to this, it's about $80/month, give or take a $5 or $10 depending on whether it's name brand.
flashlv: Also Quin, looking at other numbers I am not taking into account the doctors visit which is probably a minimum of $50 without insurance. So if we put that in we're closer to your number. but I have a feeling they can get a prescription for a year.
And the articles I read (and referenced) don't mention anything about doc visits, just the cost of the pills per month.
And the articles I read (and referenced) don't mention anything about doc visits, just the cost of the pills per month.
fatsean: That's pretty funny. A shame it's not really a parallel. But then again, I wouldn't be surprised to find some religious fingersniffer trying to outlaw hysterectomies...
Free vasectomies would be great for a lot of reasons.
Hell, the gov should pay guys $500 cash to get snipped.
If you want a vasectomy or need $500 that bad, it's win/win for everyone.
Free vasectomies would be great for a lot of reasons.
Hell, the gov should pay guys $500 cash to get snipped.
If you want a vasectomy or need $500 that bad, it's win/win for everyone.
quinblake: I found the article:
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
Click on the link provided for where that number comes from. It's pretty clearly stating that the $81 being a steal refers to specifically Yaz in NYC. Interestingly, his source link links to a price map for birth control in New York. All the prices seem pretty high except the Trinessa, and the Yaz is off the chart. It's pretty clear the takeaway here is that Yaz in NYC is expensive.
"Full insurance coverage is a critical part of the picture. Birth control is an expensive product - $81 a month is considered a steal with no contribution from your insurance, but that number still prices out many women."
Click on the link provided for where that number comes from. It's pretty clearly stating that the $81 being a steal refers to specifically Yaz in NYC. Interestingly, his source link links to a price map for birth control in New York. All the prices seem pretty high except the Trinessa, and the Yaz is off the chart. It's pretty clear the takeaway here is that Yaz in NYC is expensive.
sloth: Click on the link provided for where that number comes from. It's pretty clearly stating that the $81 being a steal refers to specifically Yaz in NYC. Interestingly, his source link links to a price map for birth control in New York. All the prices seem pretty high except the Trinessa, and the Yaz is off the chart. It's pretty clear the takeaway here is that Yaz in NYC is expensive.
That price map shows an average of $68, I guess it varies there depending on where one lives?
Here, I pay $21/month before my 80% insurance plan (through work) and the doc visits are covered by the national health care plan.
That price map shows an average of $68, I guess it varies there depending on where one lives?
Here, I pay $21/month before my 80% insurance plan (through work) and the doc visits are covered by the national health care plan.
flashlv: I think birth control is about $15 - $20 a month without a prescription, and the health district gives out free condoms.
You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month.
Which is why I buy from Canada! Yay Canada!
You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month.
Which is why I buy from Canada! Yay Canada!
flashlv: Also Quin, looking at other numbers I am not taking into account the doctors visit which is probably a minimum of $50 without insurance. So if we put that in we're closer to your number. but I have a feeling they can get a prescription for a year.
Oh hey, I went for my yearly check up and year-long bc rx. The labs (pap smear, blood test, etc) cost $603 without insurance. The doctor charged $325 for her service. $928 for a basic Ob-gyn annual check up.
Fuck dude, do you even realize how fucked up this whole system is?
Oh hey, I went for my yearly check up and year-long bc rx. The labs (pap smear, blood test, etc) cost $603 without insurance. The doctor charged $325 for her service. $928 for a basic Ob-gyn annual check up.
Fuck dude, do you even realize how fucked up this whole system is?
sloth: Click on the link provided for where that number comes from. It's pretty clearly stating that the $81 being a steal refers to specifically Yaz in NYC. Interestingly, his source link links to a price map for birth control in New York. All the prices seem pretty high except the Trinessa, and the Yaz is off the chart. It's pretty clear the takeaway here is that Yaz in NYC is expensive.
Oddly enough I'm on yasmin...in NYC...
Oddly enough I'm on yasmin...in NYC...
funklordtoejam: Oh hey, I went for my yearly check up and year-long bc rx. The labs (pap smear, blood test, etc) cost $603 without insurance. The doctor charged $325 for her service. $928 for a basic Ob-gyn annual check up.
Fuck dude, do you even realize how fucked up this whole system is?
I don't see it as f'd up at all, we have the best care in the world.
I see it as inconvenient for people without insurance and expensive.
Fuck dude, do you even realize how fucked up this whole system is?
I don't see it as f'd up at all, we have the best care in the world.
I see it as inconvenient for people without insurance and expensive.
funklordtoejam: You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month.
Which is why I buy from Canada! Yay Canada!
Me and a few others have posted links that show it's not that much in the US.
Which is why I buy from Canada! Yay Canada!
Me and a few others have posted links that show it's not that much in the US.
funklordtoejam: Oh hey, I went for my yearly check up and year-long bc rx. The labs (pap smear, blood test, etc) cost $603 without insurance. The doctor charged $325 for her service. $928 for a basic Ob-gyn annual check up.
Fuck dude, do you even realize how fucked up this whole system is?
That's a lot of money. How much per month would private insurance cost?
Fuck dude, do you even realize how fucked up this whole system is?
That's a lot of money. How much per month would private insurance cost?
flashlv: Me and a few others have posted links that show it's not that much in the US.
I guess the point is it depends on where it's purchased from.
I guess the point is it depends on where it's purchased from.
bake: source?
NO! NO SOURCE FOR U!
flashlv: Me and a few others have posted links that show it's not that much in the US.
"You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month."
Are you saying she is a liar? Because I'll take her experience in trying to purchase the BC over you or anyone's article any day...
NO! NO SOURCE FOR U!
flashlv: Me and a few others have posted links that show it's not that much in the US.
"You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month."
Are you saying she is a liar? Because I'll take her experience in trying to purchase the BC over you or anyone's article any day...
quinblake: I guess the point is it depends on where it's purchased from.
Agree. Also depends on the brand.
code_7: NO! NO SOURCE FOR U!
"You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month."
Are you saying she is a liar? Because I'll take her experience in trying to purchase the BC over you or anyone's article any day...
I didn't say that at all. I was saying that on average it is much less than that for generic.
Agree. Also depends on the brand.
code_7: NO! NO SOURCE FOR U!
"You think wrong. Without insurance, my bc costs $80 a month."
Are you saying she is a liar? Because I'll take her experience in trying to purchase the BC over you or anyone's article any day...
I didn't say that at all. I was saying that on average it is much less than that for generic.
flashlv: Agree. Also depends on the brand.
I didn't say that at all. I was saying that on average it is much less than that for generic.
Can someone ask their doctor to prescribe a particular birth control pill brand or is it up to the doc?
I didn't say that at all. I was saying that on average it is much less than that for generic.
Can someone ask their doctor to prescribe a particular birth control pill brand or is it up to the doc?
quinblake: Can someone ask their doctor to prescribe a particular birth control pill brand or is it up to the doc?
I believe so, my ex-wife got a specific brand with the "lo" at the end, because it helped with other stuff.
My last script had a check box that said, "substitute for generic" or something like that.
I believe so, my ex-wife got a specific brand with the "lo" at the end, because it helped with other stuff.
My last script had a check box that said, "substitute for generic" or something like that.
flashlv: Do you think we don't have the best services?
i did not make the claim. you did
i am asking you to back up your claim
or you can confess bullshit righth here, right now, and we will let it drop
i did not make the claim. you did
i am asking you to back up your claim
or you can confess bullshit righth here, right now, and we will let it drop
bake: i did not make the claim. you did
i am asking you to back up your claim
or you can confess bullshit righth here, right now, and we will let it drop
I use the system, we have some of the most advanced equipment in the world. We have people from all over come to the US for care.
You're asking me to prove my opinion on how I feel about the system, how would I do that?
stop being a jerk, please
i am asking you to back up your claim
or you can confess bullshit righth here, right now, and we will let it drop
I use the system, we have some of the most advanced equipment in the world. We have people from all over come to the US for care.
You're asking me to prove my opinion on how I feel about the system, how would I do that?
stop being a jerk, please
flashlv: You're asking me to prove my opinion on how I feel about the system, how would I do that?
With actual data. And the plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
With actual data. And the plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Bake, when you go to the doctor of if you have a major medical problem would you rather go to a hospital in the US or another country?
flashlv: You're asking me to prove my opinion on how I feel about the system, how would I do that?
flashlv: I don't see it as f'd up at all, we have the best care in the world.
I see it as inconvenient for people without insurance and expensive.
no where do i see an opinion stated
say what you mean and mean what you say
flashlv: I don't see it as f'd up at all, we have the best care in the world.
I see it as inconvenient for people without insurance and expensive.
no where do i see an opinion stated
say what you mean and mean what you say
Comments 1 through 100 of 189 shown.
Page
1
2
If you logged in, you could post here.