Romney Beats Obama 48%-43% In New Rasmussen Poll (with disturbing shoop)
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : codename sweatervest , herp and durr , mansplains , sturm und drang What are tags? |
I doubt it.
I'll never sleep again.
My favorite part is where he gives Barack Obama credit for the accomplishments of Congress!
Come vote with us, Danny. For ever. And ever. And ever.
Unsurprising since Frothy Mix is now blaming his Penn State grades on professors downgrading him b/c he was a conservative.
I will still bet anyone any amount of money that Obama is president this time next year.
hedon: I doubt it.
Romney polls very well with independents. Using the GOP primary as your barometer of doubt is a mistake. The independents will decide the election. Just look at how good Romney does in the liberal states. He crushes the conservative GOP candidates.
You are a partisan moron anyway, so take it that for whatever you want.
Romney polls very well with independents. Using the GOP primary as your barometer of doubt is a mistake. The independents will decide the election. Just look at how good Romney does in the liberal states. He crushes the conservative GOP candidates.
You are a partisan moron anyway, so take it that for whatever you want.
unless something major happens between now and election day, it'll likely be very close. here's a more comprehensive list of polls fwiw.
gradivus: I will still bet anyone any amount of money that Obama is president this time next year.
He has a lot failed policies to answer for and a tremendous amount of debt that he accumulated. The value of the dollar is plummeting. His energy policy is a disaster.
If Romney is the candidate, he will tear Obama up in the debates. Obama has the corrupt press on his side and a greater number of ignorant and uninformed voters as well. So we will see. It is certainly not a lock for Obama.
He has a lot failed policies to answer for and a tremendous amount of debt that he accumulated. The value of the dollar is plummeting. His energy policy is a disaster.
If Romney is the candidate, he will tear Obama up in the debates. Obama has the corrupt press on his side and a greater number of ignorant and uninformed voters as well. So we will see. It is certainly not a lock for Obama.
willywanka: unless something major happens between now and election day, it'll likely be very close. here's a more comprehensive list of polls fwiw.
If the right wing continues to alienate women and moderates, it won't be as close.
I'm back to hoping ny state goes reliably blue before election day so I can vote 3rd party.
If the right wing continues to alienate women and moderates, it won't be as close.
I'm back to hoping ny state goes reliably blue before election day so I can vote 3rd party.
the sonic dildo: Never going to happen.
Please be right
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
Please be right
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease
the sonic dildo: Never going to happen.
The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
whitebread: If the right wing continues to alienate women and moderates, it won't be as close.
I'm back to hoping ny state goes reliably blue before election day so I can vote 3rd party.
Hard to say at this point, but my thought is that Romney has largely distanced himself from his co-runners' slew of hurrr and derp about women (he's had his moments but not close to the shit that Rick's been spouting off), so once Santorum and Gingrich are gone, a lot of the controversy will go with them. Also, I think if the choice is ultimately Obama vs. Romney, you are going to see a much lower turnout than you did in '08 - neither party is particularly enamored with their respective picks at this point and I think that will be reflected come voting time.
I'm back to hoping ny state goes reliably blue before election day so I can vote 3rd party.
Hard to say at this point, but my thought is that Romney has largely distanced himself from his co-runners' slew of hurrr and derp about women (he's had his moments but not close to the shit that Rick's been spouting off), so once Santorum and Gingrich are gone, a lot of the controversy will go with them. Also, I think if the choice is ultimately Obama vs. Romney, you are going to see a much lower turnout than you did in '08 - neither party is particularly enamored with their respective picks at this point and I think that will be reflected come voting time.
vet_curm: The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
I think the whole GOP polepositioning is a shellgame, meant to distract and cause any participants in the system to question their own leader through their intensely mismatched bandleading, leading to lower turnouts overall and a more plausible underdog candidate somehow slipping through the mudslinging to become the corporations next top bottle.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
I think the whole GOP polepositioning is a shellgame, meant to distract and cause any participants in the system to question their own leader through their intensely mismatched bandleading, leading to lower turnouts overall and a more plausible underdog candidate somehow slipping through the mudslinging to become the corporations next top bottle.
the sonic dildo: He has a lot failed policies to answer for and a tremendous amount of debt that he accumulated. The value of the dollar is plummeting. His energy policy is a disaster.
If Romney is the candidate, he will tear Obama up in the debates. Obama has the corrupt press on his side and a greater number of ignorant and uninformed voters as well. So we will see. It is certainly not a lock for Obama.
I see you have moved onto the gas price bandwagon ... so predictable.
If Romney is the candidate, he will tear Obama up in the debates. Obama has the corrupt press on his side and a greater number of ignorant and uninformed voters as well. So we will see. It is certainly not a lock for Obama.
I see you have moved onto the gas price bandwagon ... so predictable.
willywanka: Hard to say at this point, but my thought is that Romney has largely distanced himself from his co-runners' slew of hurrr and derp about women (he's had his moments but not close to the shit that Rick's been spouting off), so once Santorum and Gingrich are gone, a lot of the controversy will go with them. Also, I think if the choice is ultimately Obama vs. Romney, you are going to see a much lower turnout than you did in '08 - neither party is particularly enamored with their respective picks at this point and I think that will be reflected come voting time.
We'll see. I think the spectacle the GOP is making of itself may energize the independents and D's to show up to vote.
We'll see. I think the spectacle the GOP is making of itself may energize the independents and D's to show up to vote.
willywanka: unless something major happens between now and election day, it'll likely be very close. here's a more comprehensive list of polls fwiw.
Where are they getting these people they poll?
Where are they getting these people they poll?
willywanka: Also, I think if the choice is ultimately Obama vs. Romney, you are going to see a much lower turnout than you did in '08 - neither party is particularly enamored with their respective picks at this point and I think that will be reflected come voting time.
No. You are going to see record turnout from the GOP this time. I know people who did not vote in 2008 and can't wait to vote now. Obama will have less turnout than he did in 2008 as well.
vet_curm: The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
Nope. They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
No. You are going to see record turnout from the GOP this time. I know people who did not vote in 2008 and can't wait to vote now. Obama will have less turnout than he did in 2008 as well.
vet_curm: The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
Nope. They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
vet_curm: The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
I'd rather Obama Platinum than Frothy Mix any day...
Wait for the returns tonight.
They'll sit home in November when it's Romney, and there's no chance for a Republican without the South.
I'd rather Obama Platinum than Frothy Mix any day...
the sonic dildo: No. You are going to see record turnout from the GOP this time. I know people who did not vote in 2008 and can't wait to vote now. Obama will have less turnout than he did in 2008 as well.
Nope. They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
And we will have moon bases on Jupiter by November.
Nope. They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
And we will have moon bases on Jupiter by November.
xxplosiv: I think the whole GOP polepositioning is a shellgame, meant to distract and cause any participants in the system to question their own leader through their intensely mismatched bandleading, leading to lower turnouts overall and a more plausible underdog candidate somehow slipping through the mudslinging to become the corporations next top bottle.
Yeah, I can see that, but who?
Too soon.
Chocolate shoes.
Yeah, I can see that, but who?
Too soon.
Chocolate shoes.
The polls show it happening.. Are people going to all of a sudden say polls are wrong?
swingingjohnson: Where are they getting these people they poll?
can't speak for all of them...ABC has used this research group for years.
can't speak for all of them...ABC has used this research group for years.
flashlv: The polls show it happening.. Are people going to all of a sudden say polls are wrong?
Clap harder.
For purposes of illustration, shall I submit to the Q a poll on the question:
Would the results of such a poll be wrong?
Clap harder.
For purposes of illustration, shall I submit to the Q a poll on the question:
Does flashlv bring anything here other than sturm und drang (modern translation herp and durr)?
Would the results of such a poll be wrong?
flashlv: The polls show it happening.. Are people going to all of a sudden say polls are wrong?
Polls are wrong!
Polls are wrong!
vet_curm: Does flashlv bring anything here other than sturm und drang (modern translation herp and durr)?
Sometimes he BAWWWWWs.
Sometimes he BAWWWWWs.
funklordtoejam: America.
Let me ask a girl this... do you think Romney is creepy looking?
On just a physical level.
Let me ask a girl this... do you think Romney is creepy looking?
On just a physical level.
vet_curm: Clap harder.
For purposes of illustration, shall I submit to the Q a poll on the question:
Does flashlv bring anything here other than sturm und drang (modern translation herp and durr)?
Would the results of such a poll be wrong?
Not sure what your issue is but there are people like Sabine, who also post polls on here as proof of something, and when a poll shows something she doesn't like, she denies their validity.
All I am saying is will she and the other see this as happening, or a possibility?
For purposes of illustration, shall I submit to the Q a poll on the question:
Does flashlv bring anything here other than sturm und drang (modern translation herp and durr)?
Would the results of such a poll be wrong?
Not sure what your issue is but there are people like Sabine, who also post polls on here as proof of something, and when a poll shows something she doesn't like, she denies their validity.
All I am saying is will she and the other see this as happening, or a possibility?
flashlv: Not sure what your issue is but there are people like Sabine, who also post polls on here as proof of something, and when a poll shows something she doesn't like, she denies their validity.
All I am saying is will she and the other see this as happening, or a possibility?
Sabine is not a she.
Sabine is a 2 headed male/female Asian creature.
All I am saying is will she and the other see this as happening, or a possibility?
Sabine is not a she.
Sabine is a 2 headed male/female Asian creature.
whitebread: Unsurprising since Frothy Mix is now blaming his Penn State grades on professors downgrading him b/c he was a conservative.
But but but, PERSONAL RESPONSEEBILLATAY!!!
But but but, PERSONAL RESPONSEEBILLATAY!!!
flashlv: Not sure what your issue is but there are people like Sabine, who also post polls on here as proof of something, and when a poll shows something she doesn't like, she denies their validity.
All I am saying is will she and the other see this as happening, or a possibility?
If you charge the questions for a poll, you will get the results you are looking for.
If you select the participants in a poll, you will get the results you are looking for.
In thepolls primaries taking place today in Mississippi and Alabama, Santorum will take first.
Do you believe this actually means he'll be elected president in November?
All I am saying is will she and the other see this as happening, or a possibility?
If you charge the questions for a poll, you will get the results you are looking for.
If you select the participants in a poll, you will get the results you are looking for.
In the
Do you believe this actually means he'll be elected president in November?
flashlv: when a poll shows something she doesn't like, she denies their validity
I don't deny Rasmussen's validity because I don't like what their polls show, but because (especially when it comes to general election predictions) they consistently overestimate Republican strength due to shoddy methodology.
I don't deny Rasmussen's validity because I don't like what their polls show, but because (especially when it comes to general election predictions) they consistently overestimate Republican strength due to shoddy methodology.
swingingjohnson: And we will have moon bases on Jupiter by November.
Hell of a retort there SJ.
The lack of reality and failure to see the big picture here from the bN Libs is so far quite reassuring.
Hell of a retort there SJ.
The lack of reality and failure to see the big picture here from the bN Libs is so far quite reassuring.
the sonic dildo: Hell of a retort there SJ.
The lack of reality and failure to see the big picture here from the bN Libs is so far quite reassuring.
Thank you.
Your comments are great too!
The lack of reality and failure to see the big picture here from the bN Libs is so far quite reassuring.
Thank you.
Your comments are great too!
sabine: I don't deny Rasmussen's validity because I don't like what their polls show, but because (especially when it comes to general election predictions) they consistently overestimate Republican strength due to shoddy methodology.
How did I know you would try to spin this.
The ABC poll linked here has the same numbers, are they also using shoddy methodology?
How did I know you would try to spin this.
The ABC poll linked here has the same numbers, are they also using shoddy methodology?
the sonic dildo: Hell of a retort there SJ.
The lack of reality and failure to see the big picture here from the bN Libs is so far quite reassuring.
hey it's a day that ends in Y and phil is a partisan hack
woopieeeeeeeeeeee!!
bang the GOP drum louder
The lack of reality and failure to see the big picture here from the bN Libs is so far quite reassuring.
hey it's a day that ends in Y and phil is a partisan hack
woopieeeeeeeeeeee!!
bang the GOP drum louder
swingingjohnson: Thank you.
Your comments are great too!
They are at least an attempt at a discussion.
baron muchhumpin: hey it's a day that ends in Y and phil is a partisan hack
woopieeeeeeeeeeee!!
bang the GOP drum louder
Just discussing the upcoming election here. Bring your partisanship, but please bring the facts when you do.
Your comments are great too!
They are at least an attempt at a discussion.
baron muchhumpin: hey it's a day that ends in Y and phil is a partisan hack
woopieeeeeeeeeeee!!
bang the GOP drum louder
Just discussing the upcoming election here. Bring your partisanship, but please bring the facts when you do.
vet_curm: The fundies are not going to vote for a Mormon.
The Tightie righties are having more meetings about what to do. The sqwuirming and Meth itch is fun to observe.
the sonic dildo: They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
Except for TEABAGGERS who are committed to an anybody but Mittins spending strategy. TP Patriots, not TP Express (A.K.A.: Freedomworks). Then there's T.E.A. Paultards.
Good luck storming the castle!
\Life long Medowcrat.
The Tightie righties are having more meetings about what to do. The sqwuirming and Meth itch is fun to observe.
the sonic dildo: They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
Except for TEABAGGERS who are committed to an anybody but Mittins spending strategy. TP Patriots, not TP Express (A.K.A.: Freedomworks). Then there's T.E.A. Paultards.
Good luck storming the castle!
\Life long Medowcrat.
the sonic dildo:
Just discussing the upcoming election here. Bring your partisanship, but please bring the facts when you do.
sure, like saying Romney will do well with INDs? and your logic is he did well in blue states like MA??
what a ridiculously stupid statement, of course the voting went to him as the other choices were horrible.
Once Obama's name is on the ballot also Romney won't have a chance in blue states
Just discussing the upcoming election here. Bring your partisanship, but please bring the facts when you do.
sure, like saying Romney will do well with INDs? and your logic is he did well in blue states like MA??
what a ridiculously stupid statement, of course the voting went to him as the other choices were horrible.
Once Obama's name is on the ballot also Romney won't have a chance in blue states
the sonic dildo: Romney polls very well with independents. Using the GOP primary as your barometer of doubt is a mistake. The independents will decide the election. Just look at how good Romney does in the liberal states. He crushes the conservative GOP candidates.
You are a partisan moron anyway, so take it that for whatever you want.
Stop being a dick.
You are a partisan moron anyway, so take it that for whatever you want.
Stop being a dick.
swingingjohnson: Let me ask a girl this... do you think Romney is creepy looking?
On just a physical level.
The entire GOP is creepy looking. Romney is a creepy robot.
On just a physical level.
The entire GOP is creepy looking. Romney is a creepy robot.
the sonic dildo: He has a lot failed policies to answer for and a tremendous amount of debt that he accumulated. The value of the dollar is plummeting. His energy policy is a disaster.
If Romney is the candidate, he will tear Obama up in the debates. Obama has the corrupt press on his side and a greater number of ignorant and uninformed voters as well. So we will see. It is certainly not a lock for Obama.
Which press is corrupt? In what way are they corrupt? How have they aided in Obama's Presidency?
If Romney is the candidate, he will tear Obama up in the debates. Obama has the corrupt press on his side and a greater number of ignorant and uninformed voters as well. So we will see. It is certainly not a lock for Obama.
Which press is corrupt? In what way are they corrupt? How have they aided in Obama's Presidency?
paranoyd: Which press is corrupt? In what way are they corrupt? How have they aided in Obama's Presidency?
he can't answer this question, i tried yesterday
just more empty blubbering from phil
he can't answer this question, i tried yesterday
just more empty blubbering from phil
funklordtoejam: The entire GOP is creepy looking. Romney is a creepy robot.
That super sexy Pelosi has them all beat, amirite?
That super sexy Pelosi has them all beat, amirite?
the sonic dildo: Nope. They will rally behind the GOP candidate.
Well, you've certainly shown your grasp of Southern evangelism to be as comprehensive as is demonstrated in the cogent discernment demonstrated in the content quality of your usual posts, haven't you?
Well, you've certainly shown your grasp of Southern evangelism to be as comprehensive as is demonstrated in the cogent discernment demonstrated in the content quality of your usual posts, haven't you?
paranoyd: Stop being a dick.
Oh please. Look at you running to the defense of someone who has been an arrogant clueless fuck and instead you are jumping all over me.
So fucking typical of this place.
Oh please. Look at you running to the defense of someone who has been an arrogant clueless fuck and instead you are jumping all over me.
So fucking typical of this place.
vet_curm: Well, you've certainly shown your grasp of Southern evangelism to be as comprehensive as is demonstrated in the cogent discernment demonstrated in the content quality of your usual posts, haven't you?
They will hold their nose and pull the lever for Romney. Romeny is better than Obama to them.
They will hold their nose and pull the lever for Romney. Romeny is better than Obama to them.
flashlv: That super sexy Pelosi has them all beat, amirite?
Nah she's a botox robot. But no amount of botox will ever make her feel....human.
Nah she's a botox robot. But no amount of botox will ever make her feel....human.
roddikinsathome: The Tightie righties are having more meetings about what to do. The sqwuirming and Meth itch is fun to observe.
Except for TEABAGGERS who are committed to an anybody but Mittins spending strategy. TP Patriots, not TP Express (A.K.A.: Freedomworks). Then there's T.E.A. Paultards.
Good luck storming the castle!
Life long Medowcrat.
Also, Republican turnout is way down, so assuming that's going to turn around because one of these lackwits is crowned Chief Choad is a bit of a stretch. But I'm sure our resident shrill shills have ani capable of gaping open that far.
Except for TEABAGGERS who are committed to an anybody but Mittins spending strategy. TP Patriots, not TP Express (A.K.A.: Freedomworks). Then there's T.E.A. Paultards.
Good luck storming the castle!
Life long Medowcrat.
Also, Republican turnout is way down, so assuming that's going to turn around because one of these lackwits is crowned Chief Choad is a bit of a stretch. But I'm sure our resident shrill shills have ani capable of gaping open that far.
the sonic dildo: Oh please. Look at you running to the defense of someone who has been an arrogant clueless fuck and instead you are jumping all over me.
So fucking typical of this place.
I didn't defend anyone. Everyone else was trying a modicum of respectability. You just out of the blue called someone a moron. So fucking typical of Phildo. :/
So fucking typical of this place.
I didn't defend anyone. Everyone else was trying a modicum of respectability. You just out of the blue called someone a moron. So fucking typical of Phildo. :/
roddikinsathome: The Tightie righties are having more meetings about what to do. The sqwuirming and Meth itch is fun to observe.
They mostly consider Mormonism to be a cult, and rank it only slightly below Islam as a false religion.
They don't really like Catholics (I know, hard to believe in this day and age, ain't it?), but they'll take one over a Mormon any day.
They mostly consider Mormonism to be a cult, and rank it only slightly below Islam as a false religion.
They don't really like Catholics (I know, hard to believe in this day and age, ain't it?), but they'll take one over a Mormon any day.
baron muchhumpin: he can't answer this question, i tried yesterday
just more empty blubbering from phil
Yeah, I was hoping he'd give it a shot, but no dice.
just more empty blubbering from phil
Yeah, I was hoping he'd give it a shot, but no dice.
the sonic dildo: They will hold their nose and pull the lever for Romney. Romeny is better than Obama to them.
See ˆaboveˆ
See ˆaboveˆ
paranoyd: Yeah, I was hoping he'd give it a shot, but no dice.
always remember: When you state a question or an argument, and your opponent gives you no direct answer, or evades it with a counter question, or tries to change the subject, it is a sure sign you have touched a weak spot, sometimes without knowing it
always remember: When you state a question or an argument, and your opponent gives you no direct answer, or evades it with a counter question, or tries to change the subject, it is a sure sign you have touched a weak spot, sometimes without knowing it
flashlv: The ABC poll linked here has the same numbers, are they also using shoddy methodology?
I don't know, and it's also perfectly possible that Rasmussen has cleaned up their act in the last couple of years. I was explaining how I assign credibility weights to various polls, and it's not based on whether or not I like the outcome.
Early hypothetical head-to-head polls have horrible track records. Carter led Reagan 62-32 in January 1980 and lost; Mondale and Reagan were tied in January 1984 (and Mondale got absolutely killed in the actual election); GHWB was leading Clinton by 15% in early 1992 and lost.
I don't know, and it's also perfectly possible that Rasmussen has cleaned up their act in the last couple of years. I was explaining how I assign credibility weights to various polls, and it's not based on whether or not I like the outcome.
Early hypothetical head-to-head polls have horrible track records. Carter led Reagan 62-32 in January 1980 and lost; Mondale and Reagan were tied in January 1984 (and Mondale got absolutely killed in the actual election); GHWB was leading Clinton by 15% in early 1992 and lost.
baron muchhumpin: always remember: When you state a question or an argument, and your opponent gives you no direct answer, or evades it with a counter question, or tries to change the subject, it is a sure sign you have touched a weak spot, sometimes without knowing it
Reality has always been a weak spot for him.
Reality has always been a weak spot for him.
paranoyd: You just out of the blue called someone a moron. So fucking typical of Phildo. :/
That was not out of the blue. Just b/c it was not apparent to you is not my problem.
That was not out of the blue. Just b/c it was not apparent to you is not my problem.
the sonic dildo: That was not out of the blue. Just b/c it was not apparent to you is not my problem.
well i don't see SJ calling you anything before you lashed out like a 3rd grader
well i don't see SJ calling you anything before you lashed out like a 3rd grader
paranoyd: Which press is corrupt? In what way are they corrupt? How have they aided in Obama's Presidency?
baron muchhumpin: he can't answer this question, i tried yesterday
just more empty blubbering from phil
I did answer the question. The press has gone beyond bias and is absolutely corrupt. They actually want Obama reelected, as they did in 2008. They are heavily invested in him. Just like you two hacks are. Difference is they have a responsibility, you do not.
When libs don't like the answer you give them, they claim you never answered it.
baron muchhumpin: he can't answer this question, i tried yesterday
just more empty blubbering from phil
I did answer the question. The press has gone beyond bias and is absolutely corrupt. They actually want Obama reelected, as they did in 2008. They are heavily invested in him. Just like you two hacks are. Difference is they have a responsibility, you do not.
When libs don't like the answer you give them, they claim you never answered it.
paranoyd: Stop being a dick.
I wish you luck, mate.
vet_curm: Well, you've certainly shown your grasp of Southern evangelism to be as comprehensive as is demonstrated in the cogent discernment demonstrated in the content quality of your usual posts, haven't you?
Overall, his talking point lead packed balderdash is less overtly racist than Mikal Morans posts, which is nice.
I wish you luck, mate.
vet_curm: Well, you've certainly shown your grasp of Southern evangelism to be as comprehensive as is demonstrated in the cogent discernment demonstrated in the content quality of your usual posts, haven't you?
Overall, his talking point lead packed balderdash is less overtly racist than Mikal Morans posts, which is nice.
baron muchhumpin: well i don't see SJ calling you anything before you lashed out like a 3rd grader
I love SJ.... and I was not calling him a moron and I did not lash out at him at all. Go back and see who it was.
See.... this level of knee jerking and piling on from knuckle-dragging reactionary libs needs to be recognized.
I love SJ.... and I was not calling him a moron and I did not lash out at him at all. Go back and see who it was.
See.... this level of knee jerking and piling on from knuckle-dragging reactionary libs needs to be recognized.
the sonic dildo: I did answer the question. The press has gone beyond bias and is absolutely corrupt. They actually want Obama reelected, as they did in 2008. They are heavily invested in him. Just like you two hacks are. Difference is they have a responsibility, you do not.
When libs don't like the answer you give them, they claim you never answered it.
Responding to being asked a question is not the same as answering it. Which you still haven't done.
When libs don't like the answer you give them, they claim you never answered it.
Responding to being asked a question is not the same as answering it. Which you still haven't done.
the sonic dildo:
When libs don't like the answer you give them, they claim you never answered it.
And when someone calls you on one or the other numerous debating fallacies you are fond of employing, you simple deny such to be the case or else assert your reply answered the question.
When libs don't like the answer you give them, they claim you never answered it.
And when someone calls you on one or the other numerous debating fallacies you are fond of employing, you simple deny such to be the case or else assert your reply answered the question.
vet_curm: They mostly consider Mormonism to be a cult, and rank it only slightly below Islam as a false religion.
They don't really like Catholics (I know, hard to believe in this day and age, ain't it?), but they'll take one over a Mormon any day.
Two to pick from, while supplies last! As seen on T.V. Some restriction apply.
They don't really like Catholics (I know, hard to believe in this day and age, ain't it?), but they'll take one over a Mormon any day.
Two to pick from, while supplies last! As seen on T.V. Some restriction apply.
paranoyd: Responding to being asked a question is not the same as answering it. Which you still haven't done.
That is an answer. What don't you like about it? You probably won't even admit the bias in the media.
That is an answer. What don't you like about it? You probably won't even admit the bias in the media.
the sonic dildo: It won't be in November
Have you got a source for historical turnout rates broken down by party registration? I'm curious what the record is that you're claiming will be broken and when it was set.
Have you got a source for historical turnout rates broken down by party registration? I'm curious what the record is that you're claiming will be broken and when it was set.
Of all the evils the GOP has beset upon America, the worst by far is not providing a lucid counter to the democrats.
vet_curm: And when someone calls you on one or the other numerous debating fallacies you are fond of employing, you simple deny such to be the case or else assert your reply answered the question.
They are not "debating fallacies". They are simply facts that you wish never existed.
They are not "debating fallacies". They are simply facts that you wish never existed.
roddikinsathome: Overall, his talking point lead packed balderdash is less overtly racist than Mikal Morans posts, which is nice.
Yet another of example of our very own "Clean Skies Initiative" n'est-ce pas?
Yet another of example of our very own "Clean Skies Initiative" n'est-ce pas?
zolividor: Of all the evils the GOP has beset upon America, the worst by far is not providing a lucid counter to the democrats.
Well said.
Well said.
the sonic dildo: I love SJ.... and I was not calling him a moron and I did not lash out at him at all. Go back and see who it was.
See.... this level of knee jerking and piling on from knuckle-dragging reactionary libs needs to be recognized.
can you ever just respond to a post without throwing your 3rd grade insults?
god you are a child
See.... this level of knee jerking and piling on from knuckle-dragging reactionary libs needs to be recognized.
can you ever just respond to a post without throwing your 3rd grade insults?
god you are a child
the sonic dildo: That is an answer. What don't you like about it? You probably won't even admit the bias in the media.
we summed this up for you yesterday. You call them corrupt because they don't slam Obama on every single thing he says or does, unlike your favorite channel Fox News
yawn.. phil is very boring these days
we summed this up for you yesterday. You call them corrupt because they don't slam Obama on every single thing he says or does, unlike your favorite channel Fox News
yawn.. phil is very boring these days
sabine: Have you got a source for historical turnout rates broken down by party registration? I'm curious what the record is that you're claiming will be broken and when it was set.
I m not Dick Morris or Karl Rove, but they have said that this would happen. So I think they might know what they are talking about.
I m not Dick Morris or Karl Rove, but they have said that this would happen. So I think they might know what they are talking about.
the sonic dildo: They are not "debating fallacies". They are simply facts that you wish never existed.
See?
Most people would not reply with the very example I pointed out.
(we can all rest, safe in the knowledge that you are NOT "most people")
See?
Most people would not reply with the very example I pointed out.
(we can all rest, safe in the knowledge that you are NOT "most people")
vet_curm: Yet another of example of our very own "Clean Skies Initiative" n'est-ce pas?
Healthy Forest Initiative
Healthy Forest Initiative
the sonic dildo: I m not Dick Morris or Karl Rove,
More's the pity.
At least THAT would be entertaining.
More's the pity.
At least THAT would be entertaining.
baron muchhumpin: we summed this up for you yesterday. You call them corrupt because they don't slam Obama on every single thing he says or does, unlike your favorite channel Fox News
yawn.. phil is very boring these days
They don't even report bad stuff for him, much less hold him to task for his actions.
The truth is boring baron. Glad you survived your ride yesterday.
yawn.. phil is very boring these days
They don't even report bad stuff for him, much less hold him to task for his actions.
The truth is boring baron. Glad you survived your ride yesterday.
sabine: Have you got a source for historical turnout rates broken down by party registration? I'm curious what the record is that you're claiming will be broken and when it was set.
He's "On message", They'll turn out, Turdblossim said so.
He's "On message", They'll turn out, Turdblossim said so.
the sonic dildo: They don't even report bad stuff for him, much less hold him to task for his actions.
The truth is boring baron. Glad you survived your ride yesterday.
survived today's ride too.. man this weather is nice!
and of course they report bad stuff, as i pointed out, the non-stop birth certificate coverage - and hey look actual numbers:
Negative coverage for the president outweighed positive coverage in each of the 23 weeks included in the study. On average, 9 percent of the stories about Obama were positive, compared to the 34 percent of coverage over the same time period that researchers deemed as negative. That time period even included Osama bin Laden’s death.
The truth is boring baron. Glad you survived your ride yesterday.
survived today's ride too.. man this weather is nice!
and of course they report bad stuff, as i pointed out, the non-stop birth certificate coverage - and hey look actual numbers:
Negative coverage for the president outweighed positive coverage in each of the 23 weeks included in the study. On average, 9 percent of the stories about Obama were positive, compared to the 34 percent of coverage over the same time period that researchers deemed as negative. That time period even included Osama bin Laden’s death.
zolividor: Of all the evils the GOP has beset upon America, the worst by far is not providing a lucid counter to the democrats.
Or not being the least bit lucid at all.
Or not being the least bit lucid at all.
the sonic dildo: I love SJ.... and I was not calling him a moron and I did not lash out at him at all. Go back and see who it was.
See.... this level of knee jerking and piling on from knuckle-dragging reactionary libs needs to be recognized.
There's a lot of LOVE in bN!
See.... this level of knee jerking and piling on from knuckle-dragging reactionary libs needs to be recognized.
There's a lot of LOVE in bN!
the sonic dildo: I m not Dick Morris or Karl Rove, but they have said that this would happen. So I think they might know what they are talking about.
Dick Morris told us that congressional staff don't have to pay back their student loans, and Karl Rove told us that labor unions don't disclose the source of their campaign contribution funding.
I think I'll stick with looking at actual numbers instead.
Dick Morris told us that congressional staff don't have to pay back their student loans, and Karl Rove told us that labor unions don't disclose the source of their campaign contribution funding.
I think I'll stick with looking at actual numbers instead.
swingingjohnson: There's a lot of LOVE in bN!
"reactionary libs"
Is that something like "capitalistic Communists"?
(at least that appellation has some basis in reality, i.e. China)
"reactionary libs"
Is that something like "capitalistic Communists"?
(at least that appellation has some basis in reality, i.e. China)
If you logged in, you could post here.