Romney Beats Obama 48%-43% In New Rasmussen Poll (with disturbing shoop)
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : codename sweatervest , herp and durr , mansplains , sturm und drang What are tags? |
It's a good seven months yet. The real poll is the one in November not ones held before the primaries are even done.
eddyatwork: It's a good seven months yet. The real poll is the one in November not ones held before the primaries are even done.
I've seen analysis showing that accuracy increases fairly linearly. Once you get to about two months out, the polls are solid enough to pay attention to.
I've seen analysis showing that accuracy increases fairly linearly. Once you get to about two months out, the polls are solid enough to pay attention to.
baron muchhumpin:
Issa has voted with the majority of House Republicans 94.7% of the time during the 111th Congress.[27] He has generally conservative political views.
The central premise of his new book is "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there".
Really.
Issa has voted with the majority of House Republicans 94.7% of the time during the 111th Congress.[27] He has generally conservative political views.
The central premise of his new book is "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there".
Really.
pajamas: I responded to you yesterday and you never responded back. Based on the comments you are receiving it looks pretty clear that the people here think that you are the one arguing irresponsibly.
Well I checked this morning and there was nothing new.... so I did not see it.
If you want to base your point on others are responding to me, that is not a good idea. The ideologues are going to back you regardless. That is bN
Well I checked this morning and there was nothing new.... so I did not see it.
If you want to base your point on others are responding to me, that is not a good idea. The ideologues are going to back you regardless. That is bN
pajamas: That is true, but I have a feeling that the misogynist rhetoric that the "vanguards" of the right have chosen to shift the argument with will translate across classes.
Count on it.
Count on it.
roddikinsathome: The central premise of his new book is "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there".
Really.
Daryl Issa wrote a book on global warming? I could not find it.
He made his money in car alarms.
Really.
Daryl Issa wrote a book on global warming? I could not find it.
He made his money in car alarms.
sabine: Carry unintended pregnancies to term.
Or pregnancies from rapes.
Or whether or not your insurance provider will cover birth control.
Many states still have 'Blue Laws' that regulate sales of alcohol and pornography.
Religion sticks its big nose in all sorts of public matters and shame a lot of people into complying with them.
It's time these fucks start getting called out for the hypocrites they are. Santorum's wife can get a dead fetus sucked out of her snatch but everyone else should be shamed, even if they are only 1 or 2 weeks along?
Or pregnancies from rapes.
Or whether or not your insurance provider will cover birth control.
Many states still have 'Blue Laws' that regulate sales of alcohol and pornography.
Religion sticks its big nose in all sorts of public matters and shame a lot of people into complying with them.
It's time these fucks start getting called out for the hypocrites they are. Santorum's wife can get a dead fetus sucked out of her snatch but everyone else should be shamed, even if they are only 1 or 2 weeks along?
the sonic dildo: Well then , hopefully the upcoming hearing on where the money does go will clear everything up. I think Daryl Issa might be chairing it. Do you like him?
ISSA IS A PISSA
ISSA IS A PISSA
code_7: Or pregnancies from rapes.
Or whether or not your insurance provider will cover birth control.
Many states still have 'Blue Laws' that regulate sales of alcohol and pornography.
Religion sticks its big nose in all sorts of public matters and shame a lot of people into complying with them.
I am all for calling out social conservatives on their hypocrisies. Santorum is a huge douche on social issues and the GOP needs to wake up.
It's time these fucks start getting called out for the hypocrites they are. Santorum's wife can get a dead fetus sucked out of her snatch but everyone else should be shamed, even if they are only 1 or 2 weeks along?
I am all for calling out social conservatives on their hypocrisies. Santorum is a huge douche on social issues and the GOP needs to wake up.
Or whether or not your insurance provider will cover birth control.
Many states still have 'Blue Laws' that regulate sales of alcohol and pornography.
Religion sticks its big nose in all sorts of public matters and shame a lot of people into complying with them.
I am all for calling out social conservatives on their hypocrisies. Santorum is a huge douche on social issues and the GOP needs to wake up.
It's time these fucks start getting called out for the hypocrites they are. Santorum's wife can get a dead fetus sucked out of her snatch but everyone else should be shamed, even if they are only 1 or 2 weeks along?
I am all for calling out social conservatives on their hypocrisies. Santorum is a huge douche on social issues and the GOP needs to wake up.
pajamas: That is true, but I have a feeling that the misogynist rhetoric that the "vanguards" of the right have chosen to shift the argument with will translate across classes.
I hope not :(
I hope not :(
the sonic dildo: Well I checked this morning and there was nothing new.... so I did not see it.
If you want to base your point on others are responding to me, that is not a good idea. The ideologues are going to back you regardless. That is bN
But it is. And you can stop.
You are consistently inventing reality to satisfy your own ideology. You are welcome to keep supporting the "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there" side, but don't pretend it's anything more than it is.
If you want to base your point on others are responding to me, that is not a good idea. The ideologues are going to back you regardless. That is bN
But it is. And you can stop.
You are consistently inventing reality to satisfy your own ideology. You are welcome to keep supporting the "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there" side, but don't pretend it's anything more than it is.
the sonic dildo: If Romney is the candidate, he will avoid it. If it is brought up you are going to see it from the Dems.
They are one's behind this whole thing.
roddikinsathome: How many Repub women are fans of the "In YOUR vagina" project? I'd bet fewer than you'd like.
roddikinsathome: Have you not heard of a little state named Virginia, and their brand new shiny "Shove things IN YOUR VAGINA!" law, all signed into law & stuff? No?
roddikinsathome: Perhaps you are unaware of Mitt Romneys position on "person-hood".
This is the platform of your party, this is the activity they are engaged in. But it's the libs fault? As you said earlier;
the sonic dildo: The truth does not change baron.
And so on...
They are one's behind this whole thing.
roddikinsathome: How many Repub women are fans of the "In YOUR vagina" project? I'd bet fewer than you'd like.
roddikinsathome: Have you not heard of a little state named Virginia, and their brand new shiny "Shove things IN YOUR VAGINA!" law, all signed into law & stuff? No?
roddikinsathome: Perhaps you are unaware of Mitt Romneys position on "person-hood".
This is the platform of your party, this is the activity they are engaged in. But it's the libs fault? As you said earlier;
the sonic dildo: The truth does not change baron.
And so on...
pajamas: I responded to you yesterday and you never responded back. Based on the comments you are receiving it looks pretty clear that the people here think that you are the one arguing irresponsibly.
All he does is find a talking point and flail it all around, then he declares himself a witty and adept debater.
Rinse, wash, repeat.
It's so formulaic, it's almost like he's a bot.
A bot... OMG HE IS A BOT!!!
It truly is not worth even trying to have a discussion with him.
All he does is find a talking point and flail it all around, then he declares himself a witty and adept debater.
Rinse, wash, repeat.
It's so formulaic, it's almost like he's a bot.
A bot... OMG HE IS A BOT!!!
It truly is not worth even trying to have a discussion with him.
code_7:
It's time these fucks start getting called out for the hypocrites they are. Santorum's wife can get a dead fetus sucked out of her snatch but everyone else should be shamed, even if they are only 1 or 2 weeks along?
Seriously, that's what pisses me off the most. Not the view that they hold, but the hypocrisy. They want everyone else to follow these laws but they always have an exception, every time, about why they are the special case.
It's time these fucks start getting called out for the hypocrites they are. Santorum's wife can get a dead fetus sucked out of her snatch but everyone else should be shamed, even if they are only 1 or 2 weeks along?
Seriously, that's what pisses me off the most. Not the view that they hold, but the hypocrisy. They want everyone else to follow these laws but they always have an exception, every time, about why they are the special case.
eddyatwork: Seriously, that's what pisses me off the most. Not the view that they hold, but the hypocrisy. They want everyone else to follow these laws but they always have an exception, every time, about why they are the special case.
Because, at the end of the day, ALL LAW has one clear exemption. It's the wealth exemption. Even if the right go their way and abortion were 100% illegal tomorrow, they wealthy fucks who made it happen could get one for their daughter or wife if they wanted. So they don't care. Class is the only distinction worth anything.
Because, at the end of the day, ALL LAW has one clear exemption. It's the wealth exemption. Even if the right go their way and abortion were 100% illegal tomorrow, they wealthy fucks who made it happen could get one for their daughter or wife if they wanted. So they don't care. Class is the only distinction worth anything.
funklordtoejam: ISSA IS A PISSA
Issa is working AGAINST the ACTA treaty, though.
I do not like this man, I disagree with almost any policy of his that I've been aware of but on the issue of ACTA, I have to support him and I've written to tell him as much.
Issa is working AGAINST the ACTA treaty, though.
I do not like this man, I disagree with almost any policy of his that I've been aware of but on the issue of ACTA, I have to support him and I've written to tell him as much.
pajamas: But it is. And you can stop.
You are consistently inventing reality to satisfy your own ideology. You are welcome to keep supporting the "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there" side, but don't pretend it's anything more than it is.
This makes no sense at all PJ
Also I am an atheist, you can stop the god stuff.
Why don't you ever counter my retorts of your points? You seem to avoid them with intent.
You are consistently inventing reality to satisfy your own ideology. You are welcome to keep supporting the "God would not let Global Warming happen, so there" side, but don't pretend it's anything more than it is.
This makes no sense at all PJ
Also I am an atheist, you can stop the god stuff.
Why don't you ever counter my retorts of your points? You seem to avoid them with intent.
pajamas: Because, at the end of the day, ALL LAW has one clear exemption. It's the wealth exemption. Even if the right go their way and abortion were 100% illegal tomorrow, they wealthy fucks who made it happen could get one for their daughter or wife if they wanted. So they don't care. Class is the only distinction worth anything.
True. Even in the old days when it was outright illegal the pregnant woman would "visit relatives" and come back nice and slim a couple days later.
True. Even in the old days when it was outright illegal the pregnant woman would "visit relatives" and come back nice and slim a couple days later.
code_7: All he does is find a talking point and flail it all around, then he declares himself a witty and adept debater.
Rinse, wash, repeat.
It's so formulaic, it's almost like he's a bot.
A bot... OMG HE IS A BOT!!!
It truly is not worth even trying to have a discussion with him.
Truth is easy when you are dealing with liars.
Rinse, wash, repeat.
It's so formulaic, it's almost like he's a bot.
A bot... OMG HE IS A BOT!!!
It truly is not worth even trying to have a discussion with him.
Truth is easy when you are dealing with liars.
pajamas: Because, at the end of the day, ALL LAW has one clear exemption. It's the wealth exemption. Even if the right go their way and abortion were 100% illegal tomorrow, they wealthy fucks who made it happen could get one for their daughter or wife if they wanted. So they don't care. Class is the only distinction worth anything.
You have avoided answering all of my questions. I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable, and you dodged that too.
I am starting to think this is all about money with you.
You have avoided answering all of my questions. I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable, and you dodged that too.
I am starting to think this is all about money with you.
the sonic dildo: Truth is easy when you are dealing with liars.
Once more with feeling;
the sonic dildo: If Romney is the candidate, he will avoid it. If it is brought up you are going to see it from the Dems.
They are one's behind this whole thing.
roddikinsathome: How many Repub women are fans of the "In YOUR vagina" project? I'd bet fewer than you'd like.
roddikinsathome: Have you not heard of a little state named Virginia, and their brand new shiny "Shove things IN YOUR VAGINA!" law, all signed into law & stuff? No?
roddikinsathome: Perhaps you are unaware of Mitt Romneys position on "person-hood".
This is the platform of your party, this is the activity they are engaged in. But it's the libs fault? As you said earlier;
the sonic dildo: The truth does not change baron.
Once more with feeling;
the sonic dildo: If Romney is the candidate, he will avoid it. If it is brought up you are going to see it from the Dems.
They are one's behind this whole thing.
roddikinsathome: How many Repub women are fans of the "In YOUR vagina" project? I'd bet fewer than you'd like.
roddikinsathome: Have you not heard of a little state named Virginia, and their brand new shiny "Shove things IN YOUR VAGINA!" law, all signed into law & stuff? No?
roddikinsathome: Perhaps you are unaware of Mitt Romneys position on "person-hood".
This is the platform of your party, this is the activity they are engaged in. But it's the libs fault? As you said earlier;
the sonic dildo: The truth does not change baron.
the sonic dildo: Truth is easy when you are dealing with liars.
i know, "debating" with you is effortless
your talking points are just that, empty talking points that you repeat over and over and over...
i know, "debating" with you is effortless
your talking points are just that, empty talking points that you repeat over and over and over...
pajamas: Because, at the end of the day, ALL LAW has one clear exemption. It's the wealth exemption. Even if the right go their way and abortion were 100% illegal tomorrow, they wealthy fucks who made it happen could get one for their daughter or wife if they wanted. So they don't care. Class is the only distinction worth anything.
This really is what it all boils down to, unfortunately.
It's what I had hoped the 99% movement was going to help address. At least begin some sort of meaningful dialog, but they got marginalized and ostracized pretty quickly.
Hopefully we only saw the beginning of the movement...
This really is what it all boils down to, unfortunately.
It's what I had hoped the 99% movement was going to help address. At least begin some sort of meaningful dialog, but they got marginalized and ostracized pretty quickly.
Hopefully we only saw the beginning of the movement...
code_7:
Hopefully we only saw the beginning of the movement...
they had no chance. It wasn't one party against another, the OWS crowd was going against the establishment, and the establishment has VERY deep pockets
once OWS started to pick up steam the counter forces united and destroyed them swiftly
Hopefully we only saw the beginning of the movement...
they had no chance. It wasn't one party against another, the OWS crowd was going against the establishment, and the establishment has VERY deep pockets
once OWS started to pick up steam the counter forces united and destroyed them swiftly
OWS never even became mainstream because the corporate owned media made damned sure it would stay marginal at best. It's why they hate the internet so much. The internet as it stands bypasses the MSM completely and allows people to get together.
baron muchhumpin: i know, "debating" with you is effortless
your talking points are just that, empty talking points that you repeat over and over and over...
It's pretty annoying actually. I've had very spirited and lively debates with conservative republicans before, it is possible.
Just not with all of them.
your talking points are just that, empty talking points that you repeat over and over and over...
It's pretty annoying actually. I've had very spirited and lively debates with conservative republicans before, it is possible.
Just not with all of them.
eddyatwork: OWS never even became mainstream because the corporate owned corrupt/Obama loving media made damned sure it would stay marginal at best. It's why they hate the internet so much. The internet as it stands bypasses the MSM completely and allows people to get together.
Please. Obama is a moderate right winger. OWS was centrist and yet are painted as socialists.
code_7: It's pretty annoying actually. I've had very spirited and lively debates with conservative republicans before, it is possible.
Just not with all of them.
oh it is very possible. Phil just falls into the classic pitfalls of debate
trying too hard to hold your line, name calling, refusal to learn no matter how many times facts are pounded into his head, and the new GOP classic - it's the DEMs fault we keep talking about abortion and R vs. W and Gay marriage, they're making us show our true stripes!!!
WAHHHH it's not fair!!!
Just not with all of them.
oh it is very possible. Phil just falls into the classic pitfalls of debate
trying too hard to hold your line, name calling, refusal to learn no matter how many times facts are pounded into his head, and the new GOP classic - it's the DEMs fault we keep talking about abortion and R vs. W and Gay marriage, they're making us show our true stripes!!!
WAHHHH it's not fair!!!
the sonic dildo: You have avoided answering all of my questions. I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable, and you dodged that too.
I am starting to think this is all about money with you.
Frightening.
I am starting to think this is all about money with you.
Frightening.
baron muchhumpin: it's the DEMs fault we keep talking about abortion and R vs. W and Gay marriage, they're making us show our true stripes!!!
The first time I actually heard a pundit say that these arguments were being started from the left, I really thought they were joking. Then I heard it again.
and again.
I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are that it will be enough to sway the election...
The first time I actually heard a pundit say that these arguments were being started from the left, I really thought they were joking. Then I heard it again.
and again.
I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are that it will be enough to sway the election...
Wealthy republican women will get abortions, pa p smears, contraception, breast exams, etc. no matter how hard republicans make it fior everyone else. So it is a non issue to them. we will see to whom else it is a non issue. I am honestly curious
code_7: The first time I actually heard a pundit say that these arguments were being started from the left, I really thought they were joking. Then I heard it again.
and again.
I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are that it will be enough to sway the election...
The latter.
and again.
I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are that it will be enough to sway the election...
The latter.
pajamas: Wealthy republican women will get abortions, pa p smears, contraception, breast exams, etc. no matter how hard republicans make it fior everyone else. So it is a non issue to them. we will see to whom else it is a non issue. I am honestly curious
When it comes down to it, the issue will be something dumb like gas prices. The voting populace has (a) no memory and (b) no sense.
When it comes down to it, the issue will be something dumb like gas prices. The voting populace has (a) no memory and (b) no sense.
the sonic dildo: I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable
They become affordable when Medicaid covers them and/or when places like Planned Parenthood provide them. They become more affordable when they are easily accessible, and women don't have to take multiple days off work and pay for long travel and hotel accommodations because some jackass legislators have decided that she needs an ultrasound (at her expense) and a 48-hour time out to think about what a nasty slut she has been.
They become affordable when Medicaid covers them and/or when places like Planned Parenthood provide them. They become more affordable when they are easily accessible, and women don't have to take multiple days off work and pay for long travel and hotel accommodations because some jackass legislators have decided that she needs an ultrasound (at her expense) and a 48-hour time out to think about what a nasty slut she has been.
sabine: They become affordable when Medicaid covers them and/or when places like Planned Parenthood provide them. They become more affordable when they are easily accessible, and women don't have to take multiple days off work and pay for long travel and hotel accommodations because some jackass legislators have decided that she needs an ultrasound (at her expense) and a 48-hour time out to think about what a nasty slut she has been.
Reference the CENSORED Doonesbury cartoon thread this week.
Fuck the "free press", BTW. Free to censor at their whim; Free to whine if someone else censors them.
Reference the CENSORED Doonesbury cartoon thread this week.
Fuck the "free press", BTW. Free to censor at their whim; Free to whine if someone else censors them.
code_7: I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are, that it will be enough to sway the election...
Goddamn, a single little comma can make so much difference in a sentence.
I wrote it and after rereading it, I couldn't even make it out...oops
Goddamn, a single little comma can make so much difference in a sentence.
I wrote it and after rereading it, I couldn't even make it out...oops
cardinal puff: Reference the CENSORED Doonesbury cartoon thread this week.
Thanks. Been off the grid for a week and hadn't seen that.
Thanks. Been off the grid for a week and hadn't seen that.
I would like to have this conversation with Phildo in meatspace. Every time he said something stupid I'd reach over and flick him in the nose. I wonder how long it would take before he just flinched on his own after he said anything like in this thread.
paranoyd: I would like to have this conversation with Phildo in meatspace. Every time he said something stupid I'd reach over and flick him in the nose. I wonder how long it would take before he just flinched on his own after he said anything like in this thread.
You have done no such thing. You are delusional. So many of you are.
The conversation of why OWS failed and getting it all wrong.
that was funny... and sad
You have done no such thing. You are delusional. So many of you are.
The conversation of why OWS failed and getting it all wrong.
that was funny... and sad
code_7: The first time I actually heard a pundit say that these arguments were being started from the left, I really thought they were joking. Then I heard it again.
and again.
I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are that it will be enough to sway the election...
You are delusional too. What do you think this regulation was designed to do?
Are you that dishonest to not admit where the whole contraception nonsense began? It began with the regulation brought forth by Sebilius.
and again.
I can't figure out if they actually believe that the entire population is that stupid, or if they're betting that enough of them are that it will be enough to sway the election...
You are delusional too. What do you think this regulation was designed to do?
Are you that dishonest to not admit where the whole contraception nonsense began? It began with the regulation brought forth by Sebilius.
pajamas: Frightening.
That is your response? I think we have established pretty well who can't defend her points here PJ. You.
You just make the same statements, and I keep asking you to defend them buy pointing out laws and rights are already in place. Then you call the listing of these facts merely "opinion"', and keep existing in your bubble where other dishonest people are upvoting you.
I actually really thought you were going to be the one progressive who would at least try to defend his or her points. Instead you are all the same.
That is your response? I think we have established pretty well who can't defend her points here PJ. You.
You just make the same statements, and I keep asking you to defend them buy pointing out laws and rights are already in place. Then you call the listing of these facts merely "opinion"', and keep existing in your bubble where other dishonest people are upvoting you.
I actually really thought you were going to be the one progressive who would at least try to defend his or her points. Instead you are all the same.
the sonic dildo:
Are you that dishonest to not admit where the whole contraception nonsense began? It began with the regulation brought forth by Sebilius.
umm, really phil? I'm pretty sure DATING BACK TO THE 80s, the GOP has been working to force woman to not have access to BPC, abortion, etc
you limiting the timeline doesn't change the reality that your party has had this stance for DECADES
Are you that dishonest to not admit where the whole contraception nonsense began? It began with the regulation brought forth by Sebilius.
umm, really phil? I'm pretty sure DATING BACK TO THE 80s, the GOP has been working to force woman to not have access to BPC, abortion, etc
you limiting the timeline doesn't change the reality that your party has had this stance for DECADES
the sonic dildo: You have done no such thing. You are delusional. So many of you are.
The conversation of why OWS failed and getting it all wrong.
that was funny... and sad
Use your reading comprehension, numbnuts.
The conversation of why OWS failed and getting it all wrong.
that was funny... and sad
Use your reading comprehension, numbnuts.
I asked this question to pajamas twice, and she refused to answer it:
the sonic dildo: I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable
At least the sabines tried:
sabine: They become affordable when Medicaid covers them and/or when places like Planned Parenthood provide them. They become more affordable when they are easily accessible, and women don't have to take multiple days off work and pay for long travel and hotel accommodations because some jackass legislators have decided that she needs an ultrasound (at her expense) and a 48-hour time out to think about what a nasty slut she has been.
It is all about the money with the progressives, not "freedom" or "women's rights" or whatever. The abortions have to paid for with other peoples money and they have to be performed everywhere so women can have abortions on demand and they should never have to take a minute off work to have a surgical procedure performed. Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion and do not want their tax money going towards it. Simply being legal in the US in not enough, they have to be "affordable" now.
Our great national nightmare of not having free abortions all over the country is clearly the nations biggest problem.
the sonic dildo: I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable
At least the sabines tried:
sabine: They become affordable when Medicaid covers them and/or when places like Planned Parenthood provide them. They become more affordable when they are easily accessible, and women don't have to take multiple days off work and pay for long travel and hotel accommodations because some jackass legislators have decided that she needs an ultrasound (at her expense) and a 48-hour time out to think about what a nasty slut she has been.
It is all about the money with the progressives, not "freedom" or "women's rights" or whatever. The abortions have to paid for with other peoples money and they have to be performed everywhere so women can have abortions on demand and they should never have to take a minute off work to have a surgical procedure performed. Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion and do not want their tax money going towards it. Simply being legal in the US in not enough, they have to be "affordable" now.
Our great national nightmare of not having free abortions all over the country is clearly the nations biggest problem.
paranoyd: Use your reading comprehension, numbnuts.
You are delusional. Period.
baron muchhumpin: umm, really phil? I'm pretty sure DATING BACK TO THE 80s, the GOP has been working to force woman to not have access to BPC, abortion, etc
you limiting the timeline doesn't change the reality that your party has had this stance for DECADES
Next , the baron will tackle the problem of slavery in America
You are delusional. Period.
baron muchhumpin: umm, really phil? I'm pretty sure DATING BACK TO THE 80s, the GOP has been working to force woman to not have access to BPC, abortion, etc
you limiting the timeline doesn't change the reality that your party has had this stance for DECADES
Next , the baron will tackle the problem of slavery in America
the sonic dildo: Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion and do not want their tax money going towards it.
Source?? I say this is just more of YOU trying to rationalize you position by thinking you are in the majority, which you aren't.
Source?? I say this is just more of YOU trying to rationalize you position by thinking you are in the majority, which you aren't.
the sonic dildo:
Next , the baron will tackle the problem of slavery in America
hey phil, got nothing as usual??
When you state a question or an argument, and your opponent gives you no direct answer, or evades it with a counter question, or tries to change the subject, it is a sure sign you have touched a weak spot, sometimes without knowing it
Next , the baron will tackle the problem of slavery in America
hey phil, got nothing as usual??
When you state a question or an argument, and your opponent gives you no direct answer, or evades it with a counter question, or tries to change the subject, it is a sure sign you have touched a weak spot, sometimes without knowing it
baron muchhumpin: Source?? I say this is just more of YOU trying to rationalize you position by thinking you are in the majority, which you aren't.
Such a weak left wing debate tactic. To ask for a source for things that are patently obvious. If a significant portion of the country was not against abortion why would so many politicians court their support. I also never said they were the majority either.
I can handle you with half my brain tied behind my back on this stuff.
Such a weak left wing debate tactic. To ask for a source for things that are patently obvious. If a significant portion of the country was not against abortion why would so many politicians court their support. I also never said they were the majority either.
I can handle you with half my brain tied behind my back on this stuff.
hey phil, got nothing as usual??
No baron, that is you.
I've been doing this for too long to not recognize weak left wing debates styles. I answer your questions. You just don't like the answers so you pretend they merely "opinion" or you incorrectly claim they are deflection.
[yawn]
No baron, that is you.
I've been doing this for too long to not recognize weak left wing debates styles. I answer your questions. You just don't like the answers so you pretend they merely "opinion" or you incorrectly claim they are deflection.
[yawn]
the sonic dildo: I asked this question to pajamas twice, and she refused to answer it:
the sonic dildo: I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable
At least the sabines tried:
It is all about the money with the progressives, not "freedom" or "women's rights" or whatever. The abortions have to paid for with other peoples money and they have to be performed everywhere so women can have abortions on demand and they should never have to take a minute off work to have a surgical procedure performed. Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion and do not want their tax money going towards it. Simply being legal in the US in not enough, they have to be "affordable" now.
Our great national nightmare of not having free abortions all over the country is clearly the nations biggest problem.
It's almost like you don't read things.
the sonic dildo: I even specifically asked you about affordable abortions and how they become affordable
At least the sabines tried:
It is all about the money with the progressives, not "freedom" or "women's rights" or whatever. The abortions have to paid for with other peoples money and they have to be performed everywhere so women can have abortions on demand and they should never have to take a minute off work to have a surgical procedure performed. Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion and do not want their tax money going towards it. Simply being legal in the US in not enough, they have to be "affordable" now.
Our great national nightmare of not having free abortions all over the country is clearly the nations biggest problem.
It's almost like you don't read things.
the sonic dildo: Such a weak left wing debate tactic. To ask for a source for things that are patently obvious. If a significant portion of the country was not against abortion why would so many politicians court their support. I also never said they were the majority either.
I can handle you with half my brain tied behind my back on this stuff.
wow, another factless answer from phil, what a shocker!!
and this "weak tactic from the left" you say? This is YOUR tactic thrown right back in your face, and little philly doesn't like it
You are full of shit, as usual
I can handle you with half my brain tied behind my back on this stuff.
wow, another factless answer from phil, what a shocker!!
and this "weak tactic from the left" you say? This is YOUR tactic thrown right back in your face, and little philly doesn't like it
You are full of shit, as usual
the sonic dildo: hey phil, got nothing as usual??
No baron, that is you.
I've been doing this for too long to not recognize weak left wing debates styles. I answer your questions. You just don't like the answers so you pretend they merely "opinion" or you incorrectly claim tey are deflection.
[yawn]
HAHAHA - phil's running on empty now. Repeating shit like flashie
you DIDN'T answer my question, you posted some crap about slavery and then claimed victory, as usual, you are full of shit and you REALLY suck as this
No baron, that is you.
I've been doing this for too long to not recognize weak left wing debates styles. I answer your questions. You just don't like the answers so you pretend they merely "opinion" or you incorrectly claim tey are deflection.
[yawn]
HAHAHA - phil's running on empty now. Repeating shit like flashie
you DIDN'T answer my question, you posted some crap about slavery and then claimed victory, as usual, you are full of shit and you REALLY suck as this
baron muchhumpin: wow, another factless answer from phil, what a shocker!!
and this "weak tactic from the left" you say? This is YOUR tactic thrown right back in your face, and little philly doesn't like it
You are full of shit, as usual
You are saying my answer is factless? How then?
Are you going to say that there is not a significant portion of the population who is against abortion?
Really?
Your only defense is to claim my answer is "factless".
and this "weak tactic from the left" you say? This is YOUR tactic thrown right back in your face, and little philly doesn't like it
You are full of shit, as usual
You are saying my answer is factless? How then?
Are you going to say that there is not a significant portion of the population who is against abortion?
Really?
Your only defense is to claim my answer is "factless".
baron muchhumpin: HAHAHA - phil's running on empty now. Repeating shit like flashie
you DIDN'T answer my question, you posted some crap about slavery and then claimed victory, as usual, you are full of shit and you REALLY suck as this
Your delusions are strong.. I never claimed victory with you either. The slavery comment went over your head obviously. It was in regards to your attempt to pretend we not living in the present.
you DIDN'T answer my question, you posted some crap about slavery and then claimed victory, as usual, you are full of shit and you REALLY suck as this
Your delusions are strong.. I never claimed victory with you either. The slavery comment went over your head obviously. It was in regards to your attempt to pretend we not living in the present.
pajamas: It's almost like you don't read things.
Wake up pajamas, you are out of your league here. I think I gave more than ample opportunity to defend yourself and your points, and you chose to obfuscate instead every time.
Even now in this very post you are doing it.
Wake up pajamas, you are out of your league here. I think I gave more than ample opportunity to defend yourself and your points, and you chose to obfuscate instead every time.
Even now in this very post you are doing it.
What I don't get is the insane cognitive dissonance of it. "As a republican voter, I want to live in a world where most women, especially those who are poor, have little or no access to family planning of any kind because I think that's going to make for a better world"
baron while you are digging up facts, try to remember that "significant" does not imply "majority"
pajamas: What I don't get is the insane cognitive dissonance of it. "As a republican voter, I want to live in a world where most women, especially those who are poor, have little or no access to family planning of any kind because I think that's going to make for a better world"
OK, who said that?
OK, who said that?
the sonic dildo: Wake up pajamas, you are out of your league here. I think I gave more than ample opportunity to defend yourself and your points, and you chose to obfuscate instead every time.
Even now in this very post you are doing it.
It's pointless to talk to you when you ignore everything that doesn't fit your worldview. So let's just wait and see how the party of Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich does with women voters.
Even now in this very post you are doing it.
It's pointless to talk to you when you ignore everything that doesn't fit your worldview. So let's just wait and see how the party of Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich does with women voters.
the sonic dildo: OK, who said that?
Your entire party. What do you think is going to happen when you battle reproductive services, women's health initiatives an contraception for years. There are places across the country where we see the results of this. Big expansive areas without service providers where access to contraception is iffy. What the fuck do you think is going to happen?
Your entire party. What do you think is going to happen when you battle reproductive services, women's health initiatives an contraception for years. There are places across the country where we see the results of this. Big expansive areas without service providers where access to contraception is iffy. What the fuck do you think is going to happen?
pajamas: It's pointless to talk to you when you ignore everything that doesn't fit your worldview.
You say this everytime, its ridiculous. I have already told you my worldview is pro-abortion, yet you choose to avoid debate and defense of your points and keep trying to paint me as a social conservative. It is not going to work. You have resorted to this tactic quite a few times in this thread.
pajamas: So let's just wait and see how the party of Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich does with women voters.
I guess we will. Will women decide that free abortions will feed their families and fill their gas tanks and clothe their children and vote for the party that will push abortions instead of the economy.
You say this everytime, its ridiculous. I have already told you my worldview is pro-abortion, yet you choose to avoid debate and defense of your points and keep trying to paint me as a social conservative. It is not going to work. You have resorted to this tactic quite a few times in this thread.
pajamas: So let's just wait and see how the party of Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich does with women voters.
I guess we will. Will women decide that free abortions will feed their families and fill their gas tanks and clothe their children and vote for the party that will push abortions instead of the economy.
pajamas: Your entire party.
LOL.... you just made it up. That is why I specifically asked you who said it.
Unreal.
pajamas: What do you think is going to happen when you battle reproductive services, women's health initiatives an contraception for years. There are places across the country where we see the results of this. Big expansive areas without service providers where access to contraception is iffy. What the fuck do you think is going to happen?
I don't know. You tell me.
LOL.... you just made it up. That is why I specifically asked you who said it.
Unreal.
pajamas: What do you think is going to happen when you battle reproductive services, women's health initiatives an contraception for years. There are places across the country where we see the results of this. Big expansive areas without service providers where access to contraception is iffy. What the fuck do you think is going to happen?
I don't know. You tell me.
the sonic dildo: baron while you are digging up facts, try to remember that "significant" does not imply "majority"
here's what you said: Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion
see how you didn't say significant and said LARGE PERCENTAGE
implying larger than the other side?
phail more
here's what you said: Who gives a crap that a large percentage of Americans despise abortion
see how you didn't say significant and said LARGE PERCENTAGE
implying larger than the other side?
phail more
oduma's ginna lose
pajamas: What I don't get is the insane cognitive dissonance of it. "As a republican voter, I want to live in a world where most women, especially those who are poor, have little or no access to family planning of any kind because I think that's going to make for a better world"
It's religion - it doesn't have to make sense.
It's religion - it doesn't have to make sense.
sloth: It's religion - it doesn't have to make sense.
This is unfortunately true. It is painful, though, to watch Santorum explain how contraception is bad for society.
This is unfortunately true. It is painful, though, to watch Santorum explain how contraception is bad for society.
pajamas: You really don't know? Or you don't care?
That is the point you decided to answer?
What don't I know? How the vote in November is gonna go? No one does. You are betting that social issues will override the economic, as all Democrats are. (Which is why the Democrats are trying to start this whole issue with contraception)
This election is not going to be about social issues, but expect to see the Dems trying to enact regulations to keep the issues on the burner.
It is going to be a referendum on Obama and the Democrats. It is going to be about the Economy and the Energy Policy (or Obama's lack of an energy policy)
Now what don't I care about?
That is the point you decided to answer?
What don't I know? How the vote in November is gonna go? No one does. You are betting that social issues will override the economic, as all Democrats are. (Which is why the Democrats are trying to start this whole issue with contraception)
This election is not going to be about social issues, but expect to see the Dems trying to enact regulations to keep the issues on the burner.
It is going to be a referendum on Obama and the Democrats. It is going to be about the Economy and the Energy Policy (or Obama's lack of an energy policy)
Now what don't I care about?
the sonic dildo: I keep asking you to defend them buy pointing out laws and rights are already in place.
*Cough*
How many Repub women are fans of the "In YOUR vagina" project? I'd bet fewer than you'd like. Have you not heard of a little state named Virginia, and their brand new shiny "Shove things IN YOUR VAGINA!" law, all signed into law & stuff? No?
Perhaps you are unaware of Mitt Romneys position on "person-hood".
*Cough*
How many Repub women are fans of the "In YOUR vagina" project? I'd bet fewer than you'd like. Have you not heard of a little state named Virginia, and their brand new shiny "Shove things IN YOUR VAGINA!" law, all signed into law & stuff? No?
Perhaps you are unaware of Mitt Romneys position on "person-hood".
Also;
Yesterday, a Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed Republican Debbie Lesko's HB2625 by a vote of 6-2, which would allow an employer to request proof that a woman using insurance to buy birth control was being prescribed the birth control for reasons other than not wanting to get pregnant.
Yesterday, a Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed Republican Debbie Lesko's HB2625 by a vote of 6-2, which would allow an employer to request proof that a woman using insurance to buy birth control was being prescribed the birth control for reasons other than not wanting to get pregnant.
the sonic dildo: That is the point you decided to answer?
What don't I know? How the vote in November is gonna go? No one does. You are betting that social issues will override the economic, as all Democrats are. (Which is why the Democrats are trying to start this whole issue with contraception)
This election is not going to be about social issues, but expect to see the Dems trying to enact regulations to keep the issues on the burner.
It is going to be a referendum on Obama and the Democrats. It is going to be about the Economy and the Energy Policy (or Obama's lack of an energy policy)
Now what don't I care about?
You live in a really strange world.
What don't I know? How the vote in November is gonna go? No one does. You are betting that social issues will override the economic, as all Democrats are. (Which is why the Democrats are trying to start this whole issue with contraception)
This election is not going to be about social issues, but expect to see the Dems trying to enact regulations to keep the issues on the burner.
It is going to be a referendum on Obama and the Democrats. It is going to be about the Economy and the Energy Policy (or Obama's lack of an energy policy)
Now what don't I care about?
You live in a really strange world.
roddikinsathome: Also;
Yesterday, a Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed Republican Debbie Lesko's HB2625 by a vote of 6-2, which would allow an employer to request proof that a woman using insurance to buy birth control was being prescribed the birth control for reasons other than not wanting to get pregnant.
That's right! Your owner, oops I mean employer, needs to know just what you are up to in that bedroom of yours!
They are paying you, so they get to know everything about you!
Yesterday, a Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed Republican Debbie Lesko's HB2625 by a vote of 6-2, which would allow an employer to request proof that a woman using insurance to buy birth control was being prescribed the birth control for reasons other than not wanting to get pregnant.
That's right! Your owner, oops I mean employer, needs to know just what you are up to in that bedroom of yours!
They are paying you, so they get to know everything about you!
pajamas: You live in a really strange world.
It is truly a bizzaro world, every time he sees Obama, he has a goatee!
It is truly a bizzaro world, every time he sees Obama, he has a goatee!
code_7: That's right! Your owner, oops I mean employer, needs to know just what you are up to in that bedroom of yours!
They are paying you, so they get to know everything about you!
Because your HR rep is so worried about your well being and careful to be confidential.
*laughter*
They are paying you, so they get to know everything about you!
Because your HR rep is so worried about your well being and careful to be confidential.
*laughter*
pajamas: You live in a really strange world.
No I don't. At least I have the intellectual honesty and ability to debate you, which is something I think you may be lacking in. You are becoming one of those libs who throws bombs into conversations and wont back up her shit.
You think my post regarding the upcoming election, and how the priorities are going fall makes me living in strange reality? You are the one who thinks free BCPs is going to be a higher priority for women than money in their pocketbook, gas in their tanks and a job.
.., and according to you I am the one who "lives in a really strange world"
Question: Do you ever get tired of being completely smacked around intellectually by someone you consider living outside of reality and disagree so much with ideologically?
No I don't. At least I have the intellectual honesty and ability to debate you, which is something I think you may be lacking in. You are becoming one of those libs who throws bombs into conversations and wont back up her shit.
You think my post regarding the upcoming election, and how the priorities are going fall makes me living in strange reality? You are the one who thinks free BCPs is going to be a higher priority for women than money in their pocketbook, gas in their tanks and a job.
.., and according to you I am the one who "lives in a really strange world"
Question: Do you ever get tired of being completely smacked around intellectually by someone you consider living outside of reality and disagree so much with ideologically?
code_7: It is truly a bizzaro world, every time he sees Obama, he has a goatee!
I am the one with the goatee, Obama is not cool enough to sport one.
I am the one with the goatee, Obama is not cool enough to sport one.
If you logged in, you could post here.