"OBAMA DECLARES WAR ON MARRIAGE" Holy shit. Do these people realize what a cartoon they've become?
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : desperation and hot dog water , mrhappyrotter is happy What are tags? |
someone who may or may not be flashLV
2012-05-09 14:54:14.0
login to vote
score 1
someone who may or may not be flashLV: LIAR!
Don't anon post as Flash. It just strokes his victim complex.
Don't anon post as Flash. It just strokes his victim complex.
This is a war on marriage like the war on drugs, except the government would be the ones giving out free drugs to everybody, so its really not even close to a war.
Fox news: Lower gas prices bad! Romney saved Detroit! More people being allowed to get married is a War on Marriage!
Fox news: Lower gas prices bad! Romney saved Detroit! More people being allowed to get married is a War on Marriage!
Faux News changed it, yet subby is still butthurt. LULZ
Obama was against it before he was for it. That's okay though LULZ!
Still doesn't change anything for anyone.
Still doesn't change anything for anyone.
As George Takei would say "...knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. "
Who's the mordibly obese fivehead talking to?
fatsean: Who's the mordibly obese fivehead talking to?
the different personalities take turns posting
the different personalities take turns posting
baron muchhumpin: the different personalities take turns posting
you forgot to uncool vote me, don't forget your douche hat!
you forgot to uncool vote me, don't forget your douche hat!
flashlv: As George Takei would say "...knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. "
Since Flash can't be trusted to post the whole thing, here is what George Takei said.
Today marks the first time in history a President of the United States has stated his support for marriage equality. I am thrilled by this news, and I commend the President for taking what many pundits inevitably will say was an “unnecessary” risk in an election year. Such an assessment, however, sadly only underscores the second-class status many LGBT Americans experience daily, knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. It is time to stop the politics and address the basic question of fairness, for that is what this is about. We cannot say we are a nation that stands for equality, while in the same breath denying basic rights of happiness, financial parity, and state-recognized companionship to millions. Nor can we any longer trot out the tired notion that civil unions and marriages are the same. For if they were, we would not call them by different names. Separate can never be equal–a lesson we learned during the Civil Rights era that we have yet to apply to the struggle for LGBT rights today. The President has done the right thing, and history will remember him for it. But for today, I am all smiles. On behalf of the LGBT community, and all those who support our cause, thank you, President Obama. Today, I can proudly feel wholly American.
Link
Since Flash can't be trusted to post the whole thing, here is what George Takei said.
Today marks the first time in history a President of the United States has stated his support for marriage equality. I am thrilled by this news, and I commend the President for taking what many pundits inevitably will say was an “unnecessary” risk in an election year. Such an assessment, however, sadly only underscores the second-class status many LGBT Americans experience daily, knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. It is time to stop the politics and address the basic question of fairness, for that is what this is about. We cannot say we are a nation that stands for equality, while in the same breath denying basic rights of happiness, financial parity, and state-recognized companionship to millions. Nor can we any longer trot out the tired notion that civil unions and marriages are the same. For if they were, we would not call them by different names. Separate can never be equal–a lesson we learned during the Civil Rights era that we have yet to apply to the struggle for LGBT rights today. The President has done the right thing, and history will remember him for it. But for today, I am all smiles. On behalf of the LGBT community, and all those who support our cause, thank you, President Obama. Today, I can proudly feel wholly American.
Link
kswheels: Since Flash can't be trusted to post the whole thing, here is what George Takei said.
thanks for posting the whole thing - honesty is important, half-truths are the tool of the GOP slaves
thanks for posting the whole thing - honesty is important, half-truths are the tool of the GOP slaves
kswheels: Since Flash can't be trusted to post the whole thing, here is what George Takei said.
Today marks the first time in history a President of the United States has stated his support for marriage equality. I am thrilled by this news, and I commend the President for taking what many pundits inevitably will say was an “unnecessary” risk in an election year. Such an assessment, however, sadly only underscores the second-class status many LGBT Americans experience daily, knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. It is time to stop the politics and address the basic question of fairness, for that is what this is about. We cannot say we are a nation that stands for equality, while in the same breath denying basic rights of happiness, financial parity, and state-recognized companionship to millions. Nor can we any longer trot out the tired notion that civil unions and marriages are the same. For if they were, we would not call them by different names. Separate can never be equal–a lesson we learned during the Civil Rights era that we have yet to apply to the struggle for LGBT rights today. The President has done the right thing, and history will remember him for it. But for today, I am all smiles. On behalf of the LGBT community, and all those who support our cause, thank you, President Obama. Today, I can proudly feel wholly American.
Link
Um, what did I miss? he said hat I said. So again, what was wrong with that?
Today marks the first time in history a President of the United States has stated his support for marriage equality. I am thrilled by this news, and I commend the President for taking what many pundits inevitably will say was an “unnecessary” risk in an election year. Such an assessment, however, sadly only underscores the second-class status many LGBT Americans experience daily, knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. It is time to stop the politics and address the basic question of fairness, for that is what this is about. We cannot say we are a nation that stands for equality, while in the same breath denying basic rights of happiness, financial parity, and state-recognized companionship to millions. Nor can we any longer trot out the tired notion that civil unions and marriages are the same. For if they were, we would not call them by different names. Separate can never be equal–a lesson we learned during the Civil Rights era that we have yet to apply to the struggle for LGBT rights today. The President has done the right thing, and history will remember him for it. But for today, I am all smiles. On behalf of the LGBT community, and all those who support our cause, thank you, President Obama. Today, I can proudly feel wholly American.
Link
Um, what did I miss? he said hat I said. So again, what was wrong with that?
baron muchhumpin: thanks for posting the whole thing - honesty is important, half-truths are the tool of the GOP slaves
Don't forget to uncool vote me mr. cool man!!
Don't forget to uncool vote me mr. cool man!!
flashlv: Um, what did I miss? he said hat I said. So again, what was wrong with that?
You cut it to make it seem like George was criticizing Obama, when he wasn't.
You cut it to make it seem like George was criticizing Obama, when he wasn't.
kswheels: You cut it to make it seem like George was criticizing Obama, when he wasn't.
Oh, so that's not okay? statbine does that shit all the time to me and you guys cool vote her and don't say anything.
Hmmm, hypocrisy?
Oh, so that's not okay? statbine does that shit all the time to me and you guys cool vote her and don't say anything.
Hmmm, hypocrisy?
baron muchhumpin: lol, flashie has epic butthurt syndrome...
Riiight, but uncool voting isn't acting butthurt LULZ!!
Riiight, but uncool voting isn't acting butthurt LULZ!!
I started reading their comments and it reminded me of when I accidentally walked in on some fat old grandma lady taking a shit at some family party I attended as a kid.
Not a pretty sight. Something you really don't want to see.
Not a pretty sight. Something you really don't want to see.
flashlv: Riiight, but uncool voting isn't acting butthurt LULZ!!
it isn't. It's a mechanism built to this website that allows us to shun behavior we deem not necessary.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
it isn't. It's a mechanism built to this website that allows us to shun behavior we deem not necessary.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
sabine: Erm...
Hey kswheels, statbine just did it to me, you better get on her and show you meen what you say!
Hey kswheels, statbine just did it to me, you better get on her and show you meen what you say!
baron muchhumpin: it isn't. It's a mechanism built to this website that allows us to shun behavior we deem not necessary.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
Especially when I wasn't and you just didn't like what I was saying. There is a difference with being uncool and just not agreeing with you.
So do us a favor, don't be such an uptight prick bitch.,
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
Especially when I wasn't and you just didn't like what I was saying. There is a difference with being uncool and just not agreeing with you.
So do us a favor, don't be such an uptight prick bitch.,
baron muchhumpin: it isn't. It's a mechanism built to this website that allows us to shun behavior we deem not necessary.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
I thought douchebag was one word.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
I thought douchebag was one word.
flashlv: Hey kswheels, statbine just did it to me, you better get on her and show you meen what you say!
I agree with kswheels's assessment that your snippet made it sound like Takei was criticizing Obama.
I agree with kswheels's assessment that your snippet made it sound like Takei was criticizing Obama.
baron muchhumpin: it isn't. It's a mechanism built to this website that allows us to shun behavior we deem not necessary.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
Also baron you do it because yo udon't like me, I could say hi, and you would un cool vote it.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
Also baron you do it because yo udon't like me, I could say hi, and you would un cool vote it.
sabine: I agree with kswheels's assessment that your snippet made it sound like Takei was criticizing Obama.
I agree that you did the same thing just now with your fucking quote you dumb twit.
I agree that you did the same thing just now with your fucking quote you dumb twit.
flashlv: Also baron you do it because yo udon't like me, I could say hi, and you would un cool vote it.
You and TBS both claim to have crystal balls that tell you why others react to you the way they do. Both of you need to get them checked out.
You and TBS both claim to have crystal balls that tell you why others react to you the way they do. Both of you need to get them checked out.
sabine: I agree with kswheels's assessment that your snippet made it sound like Takei was criticizing Obama.
Oh, and he WAS criticizing Obama, L2R!
Oh, and he WAS criticizing Obama, L2R!
flashlv: Hey kswheels, statbine just did it to me, you better get on her and show you meen what you say!
Sabine didn't change the meaning of your post with her cut.
Sabine didn't change the meaning of your post with her cut.
flashlv: Especially when I wasn't and you just didn't like what I was saying. There is a difference with being uncool and just not agreeing with you.
So do us a favor, don't be such an uptight prick bitch.,
ready flash, here is you being 100% wrong as usual
Your first post to me today:
flashlv: WTF does that matter tard face?
So do us a favor, don't be such an uptight prick bitch.,
ready flash, here is you being 100% wrong as usual
Your first post to me today:
flashlv: WTF does that matter tard face?
sabine: You and TBS both claim to have crystal balls that tell you why others react to you the way they do. Both of you need to get them checked out.
LULZ. You are HILARIOUS statbine.
LULZ. You are HILARIOUS statbine.
baron muchhumpin: ready flash, here is you being 100% wrong as usual
Your first post to me today:
You are a tard face, you were being an obtuse moron. I called you on it, don't cry too much.
Your first post to me today:
You are a tard face, you were being an obtuse moron. I called you on it, don't cry too much.
flashlv: Also baron you do it because yo udon't like me, I could say hi, and you would un cool vote it.
completely false, as usual.
I uncool your name calling
I'm not surprised you couldn't figure that out
completely false, as usual.
I uncool your name calling
I'm not surprised you couldn't figure that out
flashlv: Oh, and he WAS criticizing Obama, L2R!
Generally one doesn't use the word "commend" when criticizing somebody.
Generally one doesn't use the word "commend" when criticizing somebody.
flashlv: You are a tard face, you were being an obtuse moron. I called you on it, don't cry too much.
![]()
So again statbine, why are you allowed to do it and make a quote seem like something else, but I cna't quote like you do, huh?
baron muchhumpin: completely false, as usual.
I uncool your name calling
I'm not surprised you couldn't figure that out
OMG you have such a bad memory.
I uncool your name calling
I'm not surprised you couldn't figure that out
OMG you have such a bad memory.
sabine: Generally one doesn't use the word "commend" when criticizing somebody.
Criticism also don't usually involve thanking the target of the criticism.
Criticism also don't usually involve thanking the target of the criticism.
flashlv: OMG you have such a bad memory.
if you want to take a vote on this site which one of us has a good memory, i'd support your effort
if you want to take a vote on this site which one of us has a good memory, i'd support your effort
sabine: Generally one doesn't use the word "commend" when criticizing somebody.
FAIL! Sure they can. They can commend someone for something then criticize for something else.
ALSO, I never said he was talking about Obama, so you are the one making up faux outrage!
FAIL! Sure they can. They can commend someone for something then criticize for something else.
ALSO, I never said he was talking about Obama, so you are the one making up faux outrage!
flashlv: So again statbine, why are you allowed to do it and make a quote seem like something else, but I cna't quote like you do, huh?
I guess we have different conceptions of what "context" means. Mine seems to have been working pretty well so far, so I think I'm going to stick with it.
I guess we have different conceptions of what "context" means. Mine seems to have been working pretty well so far, so I think I'm going to stick with it.
flashlv: As George Takei would say "...knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against. "
Hey dipshit, where is this saying anything about Obama?
better defend the boogeyman!
Hey dipshit, where is this saying anything about Obama?
better defend the boogeyman!
flashlv: FAIL! Sure they can. They can commend someone for something then criticize for something else.
The way I parse it, he's criticizing the "pundits" who assess Obama's comments as an "unnecessary risk", not Obama himself.
The way I parse it, he's criticizing the "pundits" who assess Obama's comments as an "unnecessary risk", not Obama himself.
idiot: I guess we have different conceptions of what "context" means. Mine seems to have been working pretty well so far, so I think I'm going to stick with it.
First of all, how was what I quoted a criticism against Obama anyway? I re-read what I posted and no one (at least a sane person) would never think that was about Obama.
Why are you so paranoyd that someone may be speaking about your precious Obama?
First of all, how was what I quoted a criticism against Obama anyway? I re-read what I posted and no one (at least a sane person) would never think that was about Obama.
Why are you so paranoyd that someone may be speaking about your precious Obama?
sabine: The way I parse it, he's criticizing the "pundits" who assess Obama's comments as an "unnecessary risk", not Obama himself.
No, that's you infering what ever the hell you want like usual.
That statement wasn't a reflection on anyone, it was how they feel, they is the people he was talking about.
Stay classy statbine with your bullshit/.
No, that's you infering what ever the hell you want like usual.
That statement wasn't a reflection on anyone, it was how they feel, they is the people he was talking about.
Stay classy statbine with your bullshit/.
flashlv: First of all, how was what I quoted a criticism against Obama anyway? I re-read what I posted and no one (at least a sane person) would never think that was about Obama.
Well, I did, kswheels did, and I encourage anybody else who did also to upvote kswheels's post of the entire Takei statement.
Well, I did, kswheels did, and I encourage anybody else who did also to upvote kswheels's post of the entire Takei statement.
sabine: Well, I did, kswheels did, and I encourage anybody else who did also to upvote kswheels's post of the entire Takei statement.
Yes, but it doesn't change what mine said, statdumb.
Yes, but it doesn't change what mine said, statdumb.
I would have figured flash would support this gay marriage - really opens up options for him
sabine: Well, I did, kswheels did, and I encourage anybody else who did also to upvote kswheels's post of the entire Takei statement.
it's because you are blinded by your own stupidity .
it's because you are blinded by your own stupidity .
mr. cool is uncool voting me, yet he insists he is NOT butthurt.
flashlv: That statement wasn't a reflection on anyone, it was how they feel, they is the people he was talking about.
If your defense is going to be that your post containing an out-of-context snippet from Takei's remarks was incomprehensible, I guess I could agree with that.
If your defense is going to be that your post containing an out-of-context snippet from Takei's remarks was incomprehensible, I guess I could agree with that.
It's nice of all of you to console flash in his hour of need by giving him so much attention.
sabliar: If your defense is going to be that your post containing an out-of-context snippet from Takei's remarks was incomprehensible, I guess I could agree with that.
Bawwwww, keep trying to make it what it's not sabliar.
Bawwwww, keep trying to make it what it's not sabliar.
baron muchhumpin: aww butthurt baby is back to altering people's quotes
Statbine did it earlier to me, but you seem okay with that.
Statbine did it earlier to me, but you seem okay with that.
flashlv: Statbine did it earlier to me, but you seem okay with that.
hey flashie, little life lesson for you
I'm not responsible for what other people do, you cannot lump everyone together.
oh and i don't read every fucking post on this site
hey flashie, little life lesson for you
I'm not responsible for what other people do, you cannot lump everyone together.
oh and i don't read every fucking post on this site
baron muchhumpin: hey flashie, little life lesson for you
I'm not responsible for what other people do, you cannot lump everyone together.
oh and i don't read every fucking post on this site
That's HILARIOUS because you defend them an aweful lot.
I'm not responsible for what other people do, you cannot lump everyone together.
oh and i don't read every fucking post on this site
That's HILARIOUS because you defend them an aweful lot.
flashlv: That's HILARIOUS because you defend them an aweful lot.
can you quote me where i did that?
I'll wait
can you quote me where i did that?
I'll wait
someone who may or may not be having fun
2012-05-09 16:31:37.0
login to vote
score 1
flashlv: Uh, hey, everybody! I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt
baron muchhumpin: I would have figured flash would support this gay marriage - really opens up options for him
I doubt a man could stand to be around him that much anymore than a woman can...
I doubt a man could stand to be around him that much anymore than a woman can...
baron muchhumpin: can you quote me where i did that?
I'll wait
Wow, It'll be 5 pages long.
Do your uncool votes good enough?
I'll wait
Wow, It'll be 5 pages long.
Do your uncool votes good enough?
flashlv: Wow, It'll be 5 pages long.
Do your uncool votes good enough?
I'll take that as an admission you have nothing, as usual
Do your uncool votes good enough?
I'll take that as an admission you have nothing, as usual
baron muchhumpin: it isn't. It's a mechanism built to this website that allows us to shun behavior we deem not necessary.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
flashlv: Especially when I wasn't and you just didn't like what I was saying. There is a difference with being uncool and just not agreeing with you.
So do us a favor, don't be such an uptight prick bitch.,
I'm bipartisan.
You both can be douchebags & pricks.
Like when you lash out and call people names for no reason
If you don't like it, don't act like a fucking douche bag
flashlv: Especially when I wasn't and you just didn't like what I was saying. There is a difference with being uncool and just not agreeing with you.
So do us a favor, don't be such an uptight prick bitch.,
I'm bipartisan.
You both can be douchebags & pricks.
swingingjohnson: I'm bipartisan.
You both can be douchebags & pricks.
except flash did call me tard face completely un-provoked
You both can be douchebags & pricks.
except flash did call me tard face completely un-provoked
I had a conversation about this today. For fucks sakes, who cares who's fucking who?
Seems like there's more important things to be concerned with.
Seems like there's more important things to be concerned with.
flashlv: Oh, so that's not okay? statbine does that shit all the time to me and you guys cool vote her and don't say anything.
Hmmm, hypocrisy?
no it's not ok to do that, and no sabine does not do that. Stop lying.
Hmmm, hypocrisy?
no it's not ok to do that, and no sabine does not do that. Stop lying.
Strange thing I saw on FOX NEWS today.
Maybe coincidence? Probably not.
I specifically wanted to see how FOX would handle the breaking shit news story.
They had Obama make his full statement from the interview just like all the other channels did.
HOWEVER... during the presidents statement they ran a complete detailed letter box news flash (on the bottom of the screen) of details from the JERRY SANDUSKY case and trial. Words of molesting, rape, children, etc...
Of all times to run those words, FOX chose to do it only while Obama was making his statement regarding gay marriage.
Anyone think that was just coincidence?
Maybe coincidence? Probably not.
I specifically wanted to see how FOX would handle the breaking shit news story.
They had Obama make his full statement from the interview just like all the other channels did.
HOWEVER... during the presidents statement they ran a complete detailed letter box news flash (on the bottom of the screen) of details from the JERRY SANDUSKY case and trial. Words of molesting, rape, children, etc...
Of all times to run those words, FOX chose to do it only while Obama was making his statement regarding gay marriage.
Anyone think that was just coincidence?
totalsecurity: I had a conversation about this today. For fucks sakes, who cares who's fucking who?
Seems like there's more important things to be concerned with.
like bombing children in far away villages
/sorry SVR
Seems like there's more important things to be concerned with.
like bombing children in far away villages
/sorry SVR
flashlv: statbine does that shit all the time to me
Hope you've got a better example now than the last time you tried this.
Hope you've got a better example now than the last time you tried this.
sabine: Hope you've got a better example now than the last time you tried this.
Of course he doesn't.
Of course he doesn't.
swingingjohnson: Anyone think that was just coincidence?
I doubt anything can be proven to be anything other than coincidence but I think TV producers and execs put way more subliminal keys or notes into their channels than we'd like to admit to ourselves...
I doubt anything can be proven to be anything other than coincidence but I think TV producers and execs put way more subliminal keys or notes into their channels than we'd like to admit to ourselves...
baron muchhumpin: like bombing children in far away villages
/sorry SVR
You wouldn't make a joke of it if you've ever had to see the mothers faces.
/sorry SVR
You wouldn't make a joke of it if you've ever had to see the mothers faces.
swingingjohnson: Strange thing I saw on FOX NEWS today.
Maybe coincidence? Probably not.
I specifically wanted to see how FOX would handle the breaking shit news story.
They had Obama make his full statement from the interview just like all the other channels did.
HOWEVER... during the presidents statement they ran a complete detailed letter box news flash (on the bottom of the screen) of details from the JERRY SANDUSKY case and trial. Words of molesting, rape, children, etc...
Of all times to run those words, FOX chose to do it only while Obama was making his statement regarding gay marriage.
Anyone think that was just coincidence?
no. It's quite deliberate.
Maybe coincidence? Probably not.
I specifically wanted to see how FOX would handle the breaking shit news story.
They had Obama make his full statement from the interview just like all the other channels did.
HOWEVER... during the presidents statement they ran a complete detailed letter box news flash (on the bottom of the screen) of details from the JERRY SANDUSKY case and trial. Words of molesting, rape, children, etc...
Of all times to run those words, FOX chose to do it only while Obama was making his statement regarding gay marriage.
Anyone think that was just coincidence?
no. It's quite deliberate.
code_7: I doubt anything can be proven to be anything other than coincidence but I think TV producers and execs put way more subliminal keys or notes into their channels than we'd like to admit to ourselves...
that is pretty lame though. Most channels I watch show the highlights of what the POTUS is saying in their news crawl
that is pretty lame though. Most channels I watch show the highlights of what the POTUS is saying in their news crawl
totalsecurity: You wouldn't make a joke of it if you've ever had to see the mothers faces.
it was in reference to SVR's post in a different gay marriage thread
it was in reference to SVR's post in a different gay marriage thread
flashlv: Statbine did it earlier to me, but you seem okay with that.
"Did you mean:
statbrain
stateline
statline
statine"
"Did you mean:
statbrain
stateline
statline
statine"
baron muchhumpin: here's our entire exchange:
[image removed]
how did i provoke you exactly?
That WASN'T the entire thing Mr. fail.
[image removed]
how did i provoke you exactly?
That WASN'T the entire thing Mr. fail.
burntman: no it's not ok to do that, and no sabine does not do that. Stop lying.
Um, she did, she did not quote what I said, she quoted part of it and made it out of context. Not even close to the george quote.
Um, she did, she did not quote what I said, she quoted part of it and made it out of context. Not even close to the george quote.
This thread smells like desperation and hot dog water.
flashlv: That WASN'T the entire thing Mr. fail.
Yes, Yes it was.
There was more AFTER, but that was my first post in that thread, and that was YOUR response to it.
Can you prove it wrong?
Yes, Yes it was.
There was more AFTER, but that was my first post in that thread, and that was YOUR response to it.
Can you prove it wrong?
100
swingingjohnson: Strange thing I saw on FOX NEWS today.
Maybe coincidence? Probably not.
I specifically wanted to see how FOX would handle the breaking shit news story.
They had Obama make his full statement from the interview just like all the other channels did.
HOWEVER... during the presidents statement they ran a complete detailed letter box news flash (on the bottom of the screen) of details from the JERRY SANDUSKY case and trial. Words of molesting, rape, children, etc...
Of all times to run those words, FOX chose to do it only while Obama was making his statement regarding gay marriage.
Anyone think that was just coincidence?
Yes, coincidence.
You would have to be a crazy douche to think that!
Like this guy:
burntman: no. It's quite deliberate.
Maybe coincidence? Probably not.
I specifically wanted to see how FOX would handle the breaking shit news story.
They had Obama make his full statement from the interview just like all the other channels did.
HOWEVER... during the presidents statement they ran a complete detailed letter box news flash (on the bottom of the screen) of details from the JERRY SANDUSKY case and trial. Words of molesting, rape, children, etc...
Of all times to run those words, FOX chose to do it only while Obama was making his statement regarding gay marriage.
Anyone think that was just coincidence?
Yes, coincidence.
You would have to be a crazy douche to think that!
Like this guy:
burntman: no. It's quite deliberate.
flashlv: That WASN'T the entire thing Mr. fail.
Jesus Christ, but you really do whine a lot. Are you really incapable of having anything approximating a normal discussion without whining?
Jesus Christ, but you really do whine a lot. Are you really incapable of having anything approximating a normal discussion without whining?
baron muchhumpin: Yes, Yes it was.
There was more AFTER, but that was my first post in that thread, and that was YOUR response to it.
Can you prove it wrong?
Yes, easily. It's your accusatory tone and assholeness form another thread.
There was more AFTER, but that was my first post in that thread, and that was YOUR response to it.
Can you prove it wrong?
Yes, easily. It's your accusatory tone and assholeness form another thread.
burntman: Jesus Christ, but you really do whine a lot. Are you really incapable of having anything approximating a normal discussion without whining?
Aren't you whining now when you say that though?
Aren't you whining now when you say that though?
flashlv: Yes, easily. It's your accusatory tone and assholeness form another thread.
LOL - epic butthurt
And that wasn't a thread from today, you're carrying over from days now?
Can I just start everyday crushing you?
LOL - epic butthurt
And that wasn't a thread from today, you're carrying over from days now?
Can I just start everyday crushing you?
burntman: Jesus Christ, but you really do whine a lot. Are you really incapable of having anything approximating a normal discussion without whining?
I would have a normal fucking discussion if people weren't reactionary pricks and act like I say things and mean things other than what I say.
Why is this my fault?
I would have a normal fucking discussion if people weren't reactionary pricks and act like I say things and mean things other than what I say.
Why is this my fault?
baron muchhumpin: LOL - epic butthurt
And that wasn't a thread from today, you're carrying over from days now?
Can I just start everyday crushing you?
No, it was a thread from earlier today.
And that wasn't a thread from today, you're carrying over from days now?
Can I just start everyday crushing you?
No, it was a thread from earlier today.
burntman: Jesus Christ, but you really do whine a lot. Are you really incapable of having anything approximating a normal discussion without whining?
Amanda: I'll be the victim!
Wednesday: All your life.
Obscure?
Amanda: I'll be the victim!
Wednesday: All your life.
Obscure?
totalsecurity: Amanda: I'll be the victim!
Wednesday: All your life.
Obscure?
Ted Kennedy is never obscure.
Wednesday: All your life.
Obscure?
Ted Kennedy is never obscure.
sabine: Because you made us, flash. You made us.
Seriously, you guys constantly being dicks to me makes it all my fault? BWAHAHAHA
Seriously though, why do you constantly misquote me? Do you do it on purpose?
Seriously, you guys constantly being dicks to me makes it all my fault? BWAHAHAHA
Seriously though, why do you constantly misquote me? Do you do it on purpose?
flashlv: Seriously, you guys constantly being dicks to me makes it all my fault? BWAHAHAHA
Seriously though, why do you constantly misquote me? Do you do it on purpose?
seriously, show me the thread from today that caused you to call me a tard face
Seriously though, why do you constantly misquote me? Do you do it on purpose?
seriously, show me the thread from today that caused you to call me a tard face
baron muchhumpin: seriously, show me the thread from today that caused you to call me a tard face
Are you statbine?
Are you statbine?
keerbip:
I'd like to see someone do a backflip with a horse.
Seen it with a dirtbike, BMX, and a snowmachine, never a horse.
I'd like to see someone do a backflip with a horse.
Seen it with a dirtbike, BMX, and a snowmachine, never a horse.
flashlv: You do have a bad memory.
flashlv: Are you statbine?
flashlv: No, it was a thread from earlier today.
umm.. really?
flashlv: Are you statbine?
flashlv: No, it was a thread from earlier today.
umm.. really?
baron muchhumpin: umm.. really?
Are you statbine, why are you defending her and answering for her?!?
Are you statbine, why are you defending her and answering for her?!?
flashlv: why do you constantly misquote me?
If it's so constant, it should be easy for you to dredge up another example. Your last one is looking a bit threadbare after the flogging it took when you brought it up.
If it's so constant, it should be easy for you to dredge up another example. Your last one is looking a bit threadbare after the flogging it took when you brought it up.
flashlv: Are you statbine, why are you defending her and answering for her?!?
those were all posts you made to me.. can't you even keep track of that??
those were all posts you made to me.. can't you even keep track of that??
flashlv: I would have a normal fucking discussion
Well we would need pajamas and mutilato for that type.
Well we would need pajamas and mutilato for that type.
flashlv: Seriously, you gays Constantinople being ducks to free bikes it falls upon my geological faultline? BWANAHAHA
Seriously thoughts, whine dodo you Constantinopley misunderquote me? Do you do it on a porpose?
Damn! I didn't mean to "Cool" that! I mean the misquote above.
Seriously thoughts, whine dodo you Constantinopley misunderquote me? Do you do it on a porpose?
Damn! I didn't mean to "Cool" that! I mean the misquote above.
flashlv: I would have a normal fucking discussion if people weren't reactionary pricks and act like I say things and mean things other than what I say.
Well if it's such a common occurrence, have you considered, oh I don't know, that it might be you. Have you noticed the rest of use don't really seem to have the same problems?
flashlv: Aren't you whining now when you say that though?
No. I'm categorically stating that you whine a lot. That's not whining that's a fucking observation.
flashlv: Yes, coincidence.
You would have to be a crazy douche to think that!
Like this guy:
Yeah, I really wonder why people pick on you.
Well if it's such a common occurrence, have you considered, oh I don't know, that it might be you. Have you noticed the rest of use don't really seem to have the same problems?
flashlv: Aren't you whining now when you say that though?
No. I'm categorically stating that you whine a lot. That's not whining that's a fucking observation.
flashlv: Yes, coincidence.
You would have to be a crazy douche to think that!
Like this guy:
Yeah, I really wonder why people pick on you.
burntman: Well if it's such a common occurrence, have you considered, oh I don't know, that it might be you. Have you noticed the rest of use don't really seem to have the same problems?
flashlv: Unprovoked? BWAHAHAHHA
baron muchhumpin: here's our entire exchange:
how did i provoke you exactly?
With your random CAPITALIZATION of CERTAIN words.
You tard face!
baron muchhumpin: here's our entire exchange:
how did i provoke you exactly?
With your random CAPITALIZATION of CERTAIN words.
You tard face!
swingingjohnson: With your random CAPITALIZATION of CERTAIN words.
You tard face!
LOL.. i can see we're walking a fine line with him...
You tard face!
LOL.. i can see we're walking a fine line with him...
Fox News adherents are idiots and Rupert thanks them.
I really don't get why anyone would be against gay marriage as it doesn't affect them in any real way. Even if one believes it's a sin, then that's the problem of those who are committing that sin.
If only the religious wackos who get so up in arms about stupid crap like this instead directed their energies towards doing good. They better hope that there really isn't a heaven and hell as most of them won't be going to heaven.
If only the religious wackos who get so up in arms about stupid crap like this instead directed their energies towards doing good. They better hope that there really isn't a heaven and hell as most of them won't be going to heaven.
blandly pompous: I really don't get why anyone would be against gay marriage as it doesn't affect them in any real way. Even if one believes it's a sin, then that's the problem of those who are committing that sin.
If only the religious wackos who get so up in arms about stupid crap like this instead directed their energies towards doing good. They better hope that there really isn't a heaven and hell as most of them won't be going to heaven.
Burn the Heretic! Kill the Mutant! Purge the Unclean!
If only the religious wackos who get so up in arms about stupid crap like this instead directed their energies towards doing good. They better hope that there really isn't a heaven and hell as most of them won't be going to heaven.
Burn the Heretic! Kill the Mutant! Purge the Unclean!
blandly pompous: I really don't get why anyone would be against gay marriage as it doesn't affect them in any real way. Even if one believes it's a sin, then that's the problem of those who are committing that sin.
If only the religious wackos who get so up in arms about stupid crap like this instead directed their energies towards doing good. They better hope that there really isn't a heaven and hell as most of them won't be going to heaven.
Because churches depend on issues to keep, control and mesmerize their flocks to thus keep the tax free dollars rolling in.
This just happens to be an old and trusted issue that is easy to hate for them so they get loud with it.
So that's why. IMO.
If only the religious wackos who get so up in arms about stupid crap like this instead directed their energies towards doing good. They better hope that there really isn't a heaven and hell as most of them won't be going to heaven.
Because churches depend on issues to keep, control and mesmerize their flocks to thus keep the tax free dollars rolling in.
This just happens to be an old and trusted issue that is easy to hate for them so they get loud with it.
So that's why. IMO.
Read this in the comments of another site. Dead on:
Yes FOXPAC bigots ...... allowing ALL citizens the right to marry whom they wish and persue happiness is somehow a "war on marraige."
Just got my haircut. My hair stylist made a comment about how horrified she was that Obama supports gay marraige. Ordinarily she's pleasant enough, but I felt compelled to ask her how she'd feel about depriving a family member the right to marry? In an instant, she launched into full bigot mode and rattled off the patented hate-Obama FOXPAC daily talking points. It's really very simple and obvious. FOXPAC is fomenting bigotry, racism, xenophobia, selfishness, and rank ignorance to the segment of our populace who find comfort in propaganda that excuses their shortcomings as human beings. It is cult mentality through and through, and it is doing tremendous damage to our nation and political discourse.
Yes FOXPAC bigots ...... allowing ALL citizens the right to marry whom they wish and persue happiness is somehow a "war on marraige."
Just got my haircut. My hair stylist made a comment about how horrified she was that Obama supports gay marraige. Ordinarily she's pleasant enough, but I felt compelled to ask her how she'd feel about depriving a family member the right to marry? In an instant, she launched into full bigot mode and rattled off the patented hate-Obama FOXPAC daily talking points. It's really very simple and obvious. FOXPAC is fomenting bigotry, racism, xenophobia, selfishness, and rank ignorance to the segment of our populace who find comfort in propaganda that excuses their shortcomings as human beings. It is cult mentality through and through, and it is doing tremendous damage to our nation and political discourse.
If you logged in, you could post here.