Fox News execs: We're not responsible for what our network airs
Comment 0
Cool
vote cool
vote uncool
Terms of Service Violation
strike inappropriate
not inappropriate
Other
sunlight
get permlink
Cool
|
Tagged with : an ablative shield of interns , you simple stupid fuck What are tags? |
the sonic dildo: A little perspective is in order
Wake me when Fox News punishes one of its talking heads for donating to Republicans like MSDNC did when Olbermann donated to Dems.
Wake me when Fox News punishes one of its talking heads for donating to Republicans like MSDNC did when Olbermann donated to Dems.
FTFA: The network also issued a statement saying the video had been created by an associate producer and "was not authorized at the senior executive level."
Apparently, Fox has an ablative shield of interns between their executives and actual responsibility.
Apparently, Fox has an ablative shield of interns between their executives and actual responsibility.
the sonic dildo: A little perspective is in order
Exactly. A billboard is the equivalent of a four minute hit piece aired on a much more viewed cable network. Never misunderestimate the power of static media that you can't watch from the comfort of home. Thanks for pointing this out to The Progressives.
Exactly. A billboard is the equivalent of a four minute hit piece aired on a much more viewed cable network. Never misunderestimate the power of static media that you can't watch from the comfort of home. Thanks for pointing this out to The Progressives.
Ah, the Ken Lay defense.
little hands of concrete: Exactly. A billboard is the equivalent of a four minute hit piece aired on a much more viewed cable network. Never misunderestimate the power of static media that you can't watch from the comfort of home. Thanks for pointing this out to The Progressives.
You're missing the point. This usage of the word "forward" is part of a much bigger conspiracy.
You're missing the point. This usage of the word "forward" is part of a much bigger conspiracy.
keerbip: You're missing the point. This usage of the word "forward" is part of a much bigger conspiracy.
No.... it shows the network is actively campaigning for him. Which it is.
No.... it shows the network is actively campaigning for him. Which it is.
little hands of concrete: Exactly. A billboard is the equivalent of a four minute hit piece aired on a much more viewed cable network. Never misunderestimate the power of static media that you can't watch from the comfort of home. Thanks for pointing this out to The Progressives.
I would say more people saw the billboard than this video, not that that matters.
The basic truth is that the left has no argument.
I would say more people saw the billboard than this video, not that that matters.
The basic truth is that the left has no argument.
the sonic dildo: No.... it shows the network is actively campaigning for him. Which it is.
MSNBC has been using "Lean Forward" for a year and a half, and Obama has been using "Forward" for a month.
MSNBC has been using "Lean Forward" for a year and a half, and Obama has been using "Forward" for a month.
the sonic dildo: I would say more people saw the billboard than this video, not that that matters.
The basic truth is that the left has no argument.
Exactly. Like I pointed out, a billboard that 99.99% of the people will never see advertising a network that is routinely made fun for not having any viewers is exactly the same as a four minute hit piece on cable network that boasts of its ratings as being the highest.
The basic truth is that the left has no argument.
Exactly. Like I pointed out, a billboard that 99.99% of the people will never see advertising a network that is routinely made fun for not having any viewers is exactly the same as a four minute hit piece on cable network that boasts of its ratings as being the highest.
little hands of concrete: Exactly. Like I pointed out, a billboard that 99.99% of the people will never see advertising a network that is routinely made fun for not having any viewers is exactly the same as a four minute hit piece on cable network that boasts of its ratings as being the highest.
How in the hell are we alted?
How in the hell are we alted?
keerbip: MSNBC has been using "Lean Forward" for a year and a half, and Obama has been using "Forward" for a month.
So...you're saying that they've been working on his slogan since well before he adopted it? The collusion goes deeper than we thought!
So...you're saying that they've been working on his slogan since well before he adopted it? The collusion goes deeper than we thought!
keerbip: MSNBC has been using "Lean Forward" for a year and a half, and Obama has been using "Forward" for a month.
So, basically this "forward" conspiracy has been in the works for at least a year and a half? Scary what the progressives are willing to do to steal the country from real Americans.
So, basically this "forward" conspiracy has been in the works for at least a year and a half? Scary what the progressives are willing to do to steal the country from real Americans.
sloth: So...you're saying that they've been working on his slogan since well before he adopted it? The collusion goes deeper than we thought!
It goes more forward than we thought.
It goes more forward than we thought.
sloth: So...you're saying that they've been working on his slogan since well before he adopted it? The collusion goes deeper than we thought!
Damn you.
Damn you.
keerbip: MSNBC has been using "Lean Forward" for a year and a half, and Obama has been using "Forward" for a month.
So?
I fail to see the left's point in any way on this. It is approaching comedic levels.
So?
I fail to see the left's point in any way on this. It is approaching comedic levels.
the sonic dildo: So?
I fail to see the left's point in any way on this. It is approaching comedic levels.
So you really are saying that Obama and MSNBC have been planning this for a year and a half?
I fail to see the left's point in any way on this. It is approaching comedic levels.
So you really are saying that Obama and MSNBC have been planning this for a year and a half?
little hands of concrete: Exactly. Like I pointed out, a billboard that 99.99% of the people will never see advertising a network that is routinely made fun for not having any viewers is exactly the same as a four minute hit piece on cable network that boasts of its ratings as being the highest.
The ad was on the internet for the most part. 4 minutes is a long ad. They could not afford to show something like that on FOXNews. FOXNews has ratings and their ad time is pricey.
The ad was on the internet for the most part. 4 minutes is a long ad. They could not afford to show something like that on FOXNews. FOXNews has ratings and their ad time is pricey.
the sonic dildo: So?
I fail to see the left's point in any way on this. It is approaching comedic levels.
The Progressives are always trying to shoot down the exact moral equivalents when smart people, like you, correctly point them out.
I fail to see the left's point in any way on this. It is approaching comedic levels.
The Progressives are always trying to shoot down the exact moral equivalents when smart people, like you, correctly point them out.
keerbip: So you really are saying that Obama and MSNBC have been planning this for a year and a half?
No. They are just both obsessed with progressive retardology. And MSNBC shills for Obama and campaigns for him while also trashing Romney.
Essentially the left is full of hypocrisy, as usual.
No. They are just both obsessed with progressive retardology. And MSNBC shills for Obama and campaigns for him while also trashing Romney.
Essentially the left is full of hypocrisy, as usual.
the sonic dildo: The ad was on the internet for the most part. 4 minutes is a long ad. They could not afford to show something like that on FOXNews. FOXNews has ratings and their ad time is pricey.
Maybe you didn't read the article. It aired twice on Fox and Friends in the Morning and the cable network. Still, it is equivalent to a billboard.
Maybe you didn't read the article. It aired twice on Fox and Friends in the Morning and the cable network. Still, it is equivalent to a billboard.
keerbip: You're missing the point. This usage of the word "forward" is part of a much bigger conspiracy.
[image removed]
[image removed]
whoa whoa WHOA, back the truck up...the second one is FAST forward
[image removed]
[image removed]
whoa whoa WHOA, back the truck up...the second one is FAST forward
little hands of concrete: Maybe you didn't read the article. It aired twice on Fox and Friends in the Morning and the cable network. Still, it is equivalent to a billboard.
OMG it aired TWICE?
So what?
OMG it aired TWICE?
So what?
bake: whoa whoa WHOA, back the truck up...the second one is FAST forward
The first one is actually POWER forward.
The first one is actually POWER forward.
How dare anyone speak bad about our leader, FUCK FOX NEWS!
muninsfire: How in the hell are we alted?
It's my opinion that all the people who read and respond to phildo's posts are all alts for just one bNer. I refuse to believe that there's more than one person that masochistic out there.
It's my opinion that all the people who read and respond to phildo's posts are all alts for just one bNer. I refuse to believe that there's more than one person that masochistic out there.
bunnythor: It's my opinion that all the people who read and respond to phildo's posts are all alts for just one bNer. I refuse to believe that there's more than one person that masochistic out there.
I generally don't, myself...
I generally don't, myself...
someone who may or may not be flashlv
2012-06-01 10:05:40.0
login to vote
score 0
I claim to never have watched even one second of Fox News and yet I somehow know that they are 100% truthful and unbiased.
TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!
the sonic dildo: The ad was on the internet for the most part. 4 minutes is a long ad. They could not afford to show something like that on FOXNews. FOXNews has ratings and their ad time is pricey.
the sonic dildo: OMG it aired TWICE?
So what?
the sonic dildo: OMG it aired TWICE?
So what?
keerbip:
The could not afford to something like that on FOXNews... very often. (My bad)
Does that help? It aired 2 times. So What?
(the intense stupidity and ideology first mentality here can make a normal person like me frustrated enough to forget words)
The could not afford to something like that on FOXNews... very often. (My bad)
Does that help? It aired 2 times. So What?
(the intense stupidity and ideology first mentality here can make a normal person like me frustrated enough to forget words)
the sonic dildo: OMG it aired TWICE?
So what?
So, you didn't read the article. And, you want people to take you seriously?
So what?
So, you didn't read the article. And, you want people to take you seriously?
little hands of concrete: So, you didn't read the article. And, you want people to take you seriously?
Apparently it was everybody else's fault he was wrong again.
Apparently it was everybody else's fault he was wrong again.
someone who may or may not be flashlv: I claim to never have watched even one second of Fox News and yet I somehow know that they are 100% truthful and unbiased.AM A FUCKING LIAR ALL THE TIME
Fixed that for you.
Fixed that for you.
little hands of concrete: So, you didn't read the article. And, you want people to take you seriously?
no, he just wants to rationalize away any criticism of his boss's network and make sure that he deflects the story to anything he deems "libby'
no, he just wants to rationalize away any criticism of his boss's network and make sure that he deflects the story to anything he deems "libby'
the sonic dildo: I fail to see the left's point in any way
I think I can safely speak for everybody here when I say that you have made this point absolutely crystal clear. We also all understand that you think Obama is the worst president ever and libs are mentally ill and/or incompetent. There is no need for you to repeat any of these things further.
I think I can safely speak for everybody here when I say that you have made this point absolutely crystal clear. We also all understand that you think Obama is the worst president ever and libs are mentally ill and/or incompetent. There is no need for you to repeat any of these things further.
sabine: I think I can safely speak for everybody here when I say that you have made this point absolutely crystal clear. We also all understand that you think Obama is the worst president ever and libs are mentally ill and/or incompetent. There is no need for you to repeat any of these things further.
sabine: I think I can safely speak for everybody here when I say that you have made this point absolutely crystal clear. We also all understand that you think Obama is the worst president ever and libs are mentally ill and/or incompetent. There is no need for you to repeat any of these things further.
... and to think, Rush Limbaugh gets millions and millions a year to keep repeating those same things to his audience.
... and to think, Rush Limbaugh gets millions and millions a year to keep repeating those same things to his audience.
little hands of concrete: ... and to think, Rush Limbaugh gets millions and millions a year to keep repeating those same things to his audience.
I think of his audience like houseplants, needing a daily Rush fix like water. Oh, and because they tend to carry on conversations about as well as your average ficus.
I think of his audience like houseplants, needing a daily Rush fix like water. Oh, and because they tend to carry on conversations about as well as your average ficus.
finnley wren:
That was one of the best bits they've done in a while, did you pause it to read the corrections at the end? They were hilarious!
That was one of the best bits they've done in a while, did you pause it to read the corrections at the end? They were hilarious!
Fox news makes their viewers dumber. It's proven.
ambition chicken: Fox news makes their viewers dumber. It's proven.
What's funny is that the people citing that study never mention that the results were broken down by topic, and the least informed population varied by topic. Overall, the Fox viewers were least informed on the most topics, but on some topics they were better informed than viewers of MSNBC and/or CNN.
What's funny is that the people citing that study never mention that the results were broken down by topic, and the least informed population varied by topic. Overall, the Fox viewers were least informed on the most topics, but on some topics they were better informed than viewers of MSNBC and/or CNN.
sabine: I think I can safely speak for everybody here when I say that you have made this point absolutely crystal clear. We also all understand that you think Obama is the worst president ever and libs are mentally ill and/or incompetent. There is no need for you to repeat any of these things further.
Well, you are being intellectually dishonest by quote cropping there. I fully understand the ridiculousness of the left's point of view. It is a gift.
I do enjoy pointing out why you are, for the most part, serial hypocrites as well. Serial hypocrisy is a sign of a mental illness or simply gross ignorance. You can pick one of those too.
As far as Obama's performance goes... did you see the latest jobs report? It is not looking good.
Well, you are being intellectually dishonest by quote cropping there. I fully understand the ridiculousness of the left's point of view. It is a gift.
I do enjoy pointing out why you are, for the most part, serial hypocrites as well. Serial hypocrisy is a sign of a mental illness or simply gross ignorance. You can pick one of those too.
As far as Obama's performance goes... did you see the latest jobs report? It is not looking good.
sloth: What's funny is that the people citing that study never mention that the results were broken down by topic, and the least informed population varied by topic. Overall, the Fox viewers were least informed on the most topics, but on some topics they were better informed than viewers of MSNBC and/or CNN.
Libs hate details
Libs hate details
sloth: on some topics they were better informed than viewers of MSNBC and/or CNN.
Like the War on Christmas, for example?
Like the War on Christmas, for example?
sabine: Like the War on Christmas, for example?
At least that was real, unlike the fake War on Women.
At least that was real, unlike the fake War on Women.
baron muchhumpin: lie lie, and lie some more
If there really was a War on Women, then Romney would not be surging in the polls with women now would he?
LOL
Only idiots and ideologues believe the Obama campaign's scare tactics.
If there really was a War on Women, then Romney would not be surging in the polls with women now would he?
LOL
Only idiots and ideologues believe the Obama campaign's scare tactics.
the sonic dildo:
pssst, hey political shill - not every topic is directly tied to the election - every time someone from the party you support passes legislation that weakens women's access to PP or related services, it's an attack on their rights
see: AZ, TX and Ohio as a prime examples
pssst, hey political shill - not every topic is directly tied to the election - every time someone from the party you support passes legislation that weakens women's access to PP or related services, it's an attack on their rights
see: AZ, TX and Ohio as a prime examples
baron muchhumpin: pssst, hey political shill - not every topic is directly tied to the election - every time someone from the party you support passes legislation that weakens women's access to PP or related services, it's an attack on their rights
see: AZ, TX and Ohio as a prime examples
Look at you, there you go again. Hypocrisy.
Can't you see it?
You made an attempt to say that I had no need to be concerned over an election in MA (even though it is a federal position at stake).... then you try an make a claim that these issues going on in other states ( which are only state issues) concerning the GOP are clearly matters we need to be concerned with.
You really are easy to figure out.
see: AZ, TX and Ohio as a prime examples
Look at you, there you go again. Hypocrisy.
Can't you see it?
You made an attempt to say that I had no need to be concerned over an election in MA (even though it is a federal position at stake).... then you try an make a claim that these issues going on in other states ( which are only state issues) concerning the GOP are clearly matters we need to be concerned with.
You really are easy to figure out.
the sonic dildo: only state issues
Need I remind you yet again that Romney has promised to defund Title X on the federal level?
Need I remind you yet again that Romney has promised to defund Title X on the federal level?
the sonic dildo: Look at you, there you go again. Hypocrisy.
Can't you see it?
You made an attempt to say that I had no need to be concerned over an election in MA (even though it is a federal position at stake).... then you try an make a claim that these issues going on in other states ( which are only state issues) concerning the GOP are clearly matters we need to be concerned with.
You really are easy to figure out.
hmmm.. you certainly do have quite a dizzying intellect..
The states i mentioned made national news with their anti-women movements
is the warren/brown race national?
Can't you see it?
You made an attempt to say that I had no need to be concerned over an election in MA (even though it is a federal position at stake).... then you try an make a claim that these issues going on in other states ( which are only state issues) concerning the GOP are clearly matters we need to be concerned with.
You really are easy to figure out.
hmmm.. you certainly do have quite a dizzying intellect..
The states i mentioned made national news with their anti-women movements
is the warren/brown race national?
sabine: Need I remind you yet again that Romney has promised to defund Title X on the federal level?
I thought that was PP
I thought that was PP
baron muchhumpin: The states i mentioned made national news with their anti-women movements
Gee... with the preponderance of libs in the press that is not surprising at all.
baron muchhumpin: is the warren/brown race national?
It is a race for the US Senate, so people are interested.
baron muchhumpin: hmmm.. you certainly do have quite a dizzying intellect.
I can imagine that you do get dizzy trying to keep up.
Gee... with the preponderance of libs in the press that is not surprising at all.
baron muchhumpin: is the warren/brown race national?
It is a race for the US Senate, so people are interested.
baron muchhumpin: hmmm.. you certainly do have quite a dizzying intellect.
I can imagine that you do get dizzy trying to keep up.
the sonic dildo: Gee... with the preponderance of libs in the press that is not surprising at all.
really phil? this again?
get some new material will ya?
wah, libs and the press, unless of course they print something i like then it's go go free press!!!
really phil? this again?
get some new material will ya?
wah, libs and the press, unless of course they print something i like then it's go go free press!!!
dude if you deny the lib bias in the press you are blind.
the sonic dildo: dude if you deny the lib bias in the press you are blind.
dude put down the bong here it is on mittens' own site.
dude put down the bong here it is on mittens' own site.
sabine: dude put down the bong here it is on mittens' own site.
hey, did I deny he was going to do it?
Maybe we can't AFFORD these entitlements any more. No one is entitled to these things.
hey, did I deny he was going to do it?
Maybe we can't AFFORD these entitlements any more. No one is entitled to these things.
the sonic dildo: hey, did I deny he was going to do it?.
ummm.. every other time someone brings it up you say "he's never going to do it"
why the change of tune? get new talking points this week?
ummm.. every other time someone brings it up you say "he's never going to do it"
why the change of tune? get new talking points this week?
baron muchhumpin: ummm.. every other time someone brings it up you say "he's never going to do it"
why the change of tune? get new talking points this week?
I don't think he will actually do it. Not denying he says he will, but I don't think it will really happen.
why the change of tune? get new talking points this week?
I don't think he will actually do it. Not denying he says he will, but I don't think it will really happen.
the sonic dildo: dude if you deny the lib bias in the press you are blind.
i've already proven you 100% wrong on this - so here you are again repeating your lies
i've already proven you 100% wrong on this - so here you are again repeating your lies
so we've gone from "He's not going to unfund" to "I don't think he will"
seems so etch-a-sketchy
seems so etch-a-sketchy
baron muchhumpin: so we've gone from "He's not going to unfund" to "I don't think he will"
seems so etch-a-sketchy
I don't think he will.
That is my honest opinion.
seems so etch-a-sketchy
I don't think he will.
That is my honest opinion.
the sonic dildo: I don't think he will.
That is my honest opinion.
but your opinion is just, your opinion. Your previous stance was "he won't do it"
so in the future you should qualify your opinion posts properly and try to not pass them off as facts
That is my honest opinion.
but your opinion is just, your opinion. Your previous stance was "he won't do it"
so in the future you should qualify your opinion posts properly and try to not pass them off as facts
baron muchhumpin: so in the future you should qualify your opinion posts properly and try to not pass them off as facts
If he's going to make such a radical change, it's probably time for a new alt.
If he's going to make such a radical change, it's probably time for a new alt.
If you logged in, you could post here.